Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (9)

  • Gestion générale des documents

    13 mai 2011, par

    MédiaSPIP ne modifie jamais le document original mis en ligne.
    Pour chaque document mis en ligne il effectue deux opérations successives : la création d’une version supplémentaire qui peut être facilement consultée en ligne tout en laissant l’original téléchargeable dans le cas où le document original ne peut être lu dans un navigateur Internet ; la récupération des métadonnées du document original pour illustrer textuellement le fichier ;
    Les tableaux ci-dessous expliquent ce que peut faire MédiaSPIP (...)

  • Les vidéos

    21 avril 2011, par

    Comme les documents de type "audio", Mediaspip affiche dans la mesure du possible les vidéos grâce à la balise html5 .
    Un des inconvénients de cette balise est qu’elle n’est pas reconnue correctement par certains navigateurs (Internet Explorer pour ne pas le nommer) et que chaque navigateur ne gère en natif que certains formats de vidéos.
    Son avantage principal quant à lui est de bénéficier de la prise en charge native de vidéos dans les navigateur et donc de se passer de l’utilisation de Flash et (...)

  • Les formats acceptés

    28 janvier 2010, par

    Les commandes suivantes permettent d’avoir des informations sur les formats et codecs gérés par l’installation local de ffmpeg :
    ffmpeg -codecs ffmpeg -formats
    Les format videos acceptés en entrée
    Cette liste est non exhaustive, elle met en exergue les principaux formats utilisés : h264 : H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC / MPEG-4 part 10 m4v : raw MPEG-4 video format flv : Flash Video (FLV) / Sorenson Spark / Sorenson H.263 Theora wmv :
    Les formats vidéos de sortie possibles
    Dans un premier temps on (...)

Sur d’autres sites (2807)

  • Produce waveform video from audio using FFMPEG

    30 novembre 2020, par RhythmicDevil

    I am trying to create a waveform video from audio. My goal is to produce a video that looks something like this

    


    enter image description here

    


    For my test I have an mp3 that plays a short clipped sound. There are 4 bars of 1/4 notes and 4 bars of 1/8 notes played at 120bpm. I am having some trouble coming up with the right combination of preprocessing and filtering to produce a video that looks like the image. The colors dont have to be exact, I am more concerned with the shape of the beats. I tried a couple of different approaches using showwaves and showspectrum. I cant quite wrap my head around why when using showwaves the beats go past so quickly, but using showspectrum produces a video where I can see each individual beat.

    


    ShowWaves

    


    ffmpeg -i beat_test.mp3 -filter_complex "[0:a]showwaves=s=1280x100:mode=cline:rate=25:scale=sqrt,format=yuv420p[v]" -map "[v]" -map 0:a output_wav.mp4


    


    This link will download the output of that command.

    


    ShowSpectrum

    


    ffmpeg -i beat_test.mp3 -filter_complex "[0:a]showspectrum=s=1280x100:mode=combined:color=intensity:saturation=5:slide=1:scale=cbrt,format=yuv420p[v]" -map "[v]" -an -map 0:a output_spec.mp4


    


    This link will download the output of that command.

    


    I posted the simple examples because I didn't want to confuse the issue by adding all the variations I have tried.

    


    In practice I suppose I can get away with the output from showspectrum but I'd like to understand where/how I am thinking about this incorrectly. Thanks for any advice.

    


    Here is a link to the source audio file.

    


  • ffmpeg png to png quality loss

    13 avril 2018, par kilo

    I did a python script that managed to unshuffle a shuffled (png) image according to a specific pattern, that python script uses ffmpeg and does 12 encodes to unshuffling it (by cropping a specific part and pasting it over the existing picture).
    As such the same file is re-encoded into a new file each time, which shouldn’t be a problem since i am doing png conversion (lossless, right ?), but i still lose quality on it.

    Here are the pictures :

    Notice the loss of quality on the "ONE PUNCH MAN" text. The rest of the picture is, seemingly, literally identical. So the problem seems to be with the colors.

    Here are the ffmpeg commands i ran to get to the output :

    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[0:v]crop=200:280:200:0[t];[0:v][t]overlay=0:280" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[0:v]crop=200:280:400:0[t];[0:v][t]overlay=0:560" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[0:v]crop=200:280:600:0[t];[0:v][t]overlay=0:840" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[1:v]crop=200:280:0:280[t];[0:v][t]overlay=200:0" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[0:v]crop=200:280:400:280[t];[0:v][t]overlay=200:560" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[0:v]crop=200:280:600:280[t];[0:v][t]overlay=200:840" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[1:v]crop=200:280:0:560[t];[0:v][t]overlay=400:0" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[1:v]crop=200:280:200:560[t];[0:v][t]overlay=400:280" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[0:v]crop=200:280:600:560[t];[0:v][t]overlay=400:840" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[1:v]crop=200:280:0:840[t];[0:v][t]overlay=600:0" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[1:v]crop=200:280:200:840[t];[0:v][t]overlay=600:280" "output/001.png"
    ffmpeg -loglevel panic -y -i "output/001.png" -i "001.png" -qscale:v 2 -filter_complex "[1:v]crop=200:280:400:840[t];[0:v][t]overlay=600:560" "output/001.png"

    Anyone got any idea why is there this quality loss ?
    Strangely enough, there is no quality loss when i do it in an entirely different way (crop each square into an individual file, then each of them are put into a 1x2 vstack with the next one, then each of the resulting 1x2 files are vstacked with a second file to make a 1x4 file, then each of those are hstacked to make a 2x4 file, and finally we hstack the two resulting file for the resulting 4x4 output), even though there is more than double the amount of encodes.

  • Re-sampling H264 video to reduce frame rate while maintaining high image quality

    4 mars 2019, par BrianTheLion

    Here’s the mplayer output for a video of interest :

    br@carina:/tmp$ mplayer foo.mov
    mplayer: Symbol `ff_codec_bmp_tags' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
    MPlayer 1.0rc4-4.5.2 (C) 2000-2010 MPlayer Team
    mplayer: could not connect to socket
    mplayer: No such file or directory
    Failed to open LIRC support. You will not be able to use your remote control.

    Playing foo.mov.
    libavformat file format detected.
    [lavf] stream 0: video (h264), -vid 0
    [lavf] stream 1: audio (aac), -aid 0, -alang eng
    VIDEO:  [H264]  1280x720  24bpp  59.940 fps  2494.2 kbps (304.5 kbyte/s)
    ==========================================================================
    Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family
    Selected video codec: [ffh264] vfm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg H.264)
    ==========================================================================
    ==========================================================================
    Opening audio decoder: [faad] AAC (MPEG2/4 Advanced Audio Coding)
    AUDIO: 44100 Hz, 2 ch, s16le, 128.0 kbit/9.07% (ratio: 15999->176400)
    Selected audio codec: [faad] afm: faad (FAAD AAC (MPEG-2/MPEG-4 Audio))
    ==========================================================================
    AO: [pulse] 44100Hz 2ch s16le (2 bytes per sample)
    Starting playback...
    Movie-Aspect is 1.78:1 - prescaling to correct movie aspect.
    VO: [vdpau] 1280x720 => 1280x720 Planar YV12

    I’d like to use ffmpeg, mencoder, or some other command-line video transcoder to re-sample this video to a lower framerate without loss of image quality. That is, each frame should remain as crisp as possible.

    Attempts

    ffmpeg -i foo.mov -r 25 -vcodec copy bar.mov
    • The target frame rate — 25fps — is achieved but individual frames are "blocky."
    mencoder -nosound -ovc copy foo.mov -ofps 25 -o bar.mov
    • Videos are effectively un-viewable.

    Help !

    This seems like a simple enough use case. I’m very surprised that obvious things are not working. Is there something wrong with my approach ?