Revisions : jQuery validator

Les articles publiés sur le site

• Core : Call to resetInternals removed in remote validation callback (#…

  24 janvier 2023, par leonardospina

  Core: Call to resetInternals removed in remote validation callback (#2242)
  
  * Core: Call to resetInternals removed in remote validation callback
  
  * Core: Add unit test for issue #2150 fix
  
  * Core: fix code style errors
  
  Co-authored-by: leonardospina <leo@babieleo.it>
  Co-authored-by: Julien Tschäppät <julien.tschappat@smartliberty.ch>

• Additional : vinUS validation fails on valid vin numbers (#2460)

  1er décembre 2022, par wewhite

  Additional: vinUS validation fails on valid vin numbers (#2460)
  
  * Removed === compare, changed to ==
  Compare by value and type (===) does not work for this algorithm, as both cd and cdv can be either types at the same time.
  By comparing by value only (==) cd and cdv can be either integer or string, as a string number will be converted to a number reqardless of type.
  
  * Rewrote forloop, removed nested forloop
  
  * Additional: fixed spacing issues
  
  * Additional: Add vinUS.js validation test cases
  
  Test cases include default test with 17 one's, and additional US and Canada VIN
  
  * Additional: add two more test casses for vinUS
  
  * Additional: removed text license number, should be VIN

• Localization : Add Hindi translation (#2453)

  11 novembre 2022, par saurabhsharma2u

   Localization: Add Hindi translation (#2453)
  
  * Localisation: Update Hindi (India) translation
  
  * Hindi Translation for Step Method
  
  * HIndi-India Local messages for additional method
  
  * file rename as per  ISO 639-1 format
  
  * removed duplicate message, causing the test fail
  
  * removed duplicate "cifES" error message

• Demo : fix minlength validation in ajaxSubmit-integration-demo.html (#…

  11 novembre 2022, par vanillajonathan

  Demo: fix minlength validation in ajaxSubmit-integration-demo.html (#2454)

• Localization : Improve required translation in pt_BR (#2445)

  13 octobre 2022, par feikname

  Localization: Improve required translation in pt_BR (#2445)
  
  "É requerido" although correct is weird in this context (it's much more used in formal settings for documents known as requerimentos) and too much of a literal translation. This change aims to improve user-friendliness in this particular message.