Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/signalement

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (80)

  • Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond

    5 septembre 2013, par

    Certains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;

  • Le profil des utilisateurs

    12 avril 2011, par

    Chaque utilisateur dispose d’une page de profil lui permettant de modifier ses informations personnelle. Dans le menu de haut de page par défaut, un élément de menu est automatiquement créé à l’initialisation de MediaSPIP, visible uniquement si le visiteur est identifié sur le site.
    L’utilisateur a accès à la modification de profil depuis sa page auteur, un lien dans la navigation "Modifier votre profil" est (...)

  • Configurer la prise en compte des langues

    15 novembre 2010, par

    Accéder à la configuration et ajouter des langues prises en compte
    Afin de configurer la prise en compte de nouvelles langues, il est nécessaire de se rendre dans la partie "Administrer" du site.
    De là, dans le menu de navigation, vous pouvez accéder à une partie "Gestion des langues" permettant d’activer la prise en compte de nouvelles langues.
    Chaque nouvelle langue ajoutée reste désactivable tant qu’aucun objet n’est créé dans cette langue. Dans ce cas, elle devient grisée dans la configuration et (...)

Sur d’autres sites (12823)

  • input/output error with ffmpeg using an input URL in docker

    12 décembre 2023, par Grimou

    I need to use ffmpeg to listen to an rtmp url within a running docker container using ffmpeg.
my ffmpeg command is quite simple : ffmpeg -listen 1 -i rtmp://localhost:1935/live/app ./output.wav

    


    ffmpeg seems to start correctly and listen to the url.

    


    But, when I start the stream (using OBS Studio) I have an input/output error. Here is the logs (with debug log level)

    


    ❯ ffmpeg -loglevel debug -listen 1 -i rtmp://127.0.0.1:1935/live/app ./output.wav
ffmpeg version 5.1.4-0+deb12u1 Copyright (c) 2000-2023 the FFmpeg developers
  built with gcc 12 (Debian 12.2.0-14)
  configuration: --prefix=/usr --extra-version=0+deb12u1 --toolchain=hardened --libdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu --incdir=/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu --arch=amd64 --enable-gpl --disable-stripping --enable-gnutls --enable-ladspa --enable-libaom --enable-libass --enable-libbluray --enable-libbs2b --enable-libcaca --enable-libcdio --enable-libcodec2 --enable-libdav1d --enable-libflite --enable-libfontconfig --enable-libfreetype --enable-libfribidi --enable-libglslang --enable-libgme --enable-libgsm --enable-libjack --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libmysofa --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopenmpt --enable-libopus --enable-libpulse --enable-librabbitmq --enable-librist --enable-librubberband --enable-libshine --enable-libsnappy --enable-libsoxr --enable-libspeex --enable-libsrt --enable-libssh --enable-libsvtav1 --enable-libtheora --enable-libtwolame --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-libwebp --enable-libx265 --enable-libxml2 --enable-libxvid --enable-libzimg --enable-libzmq --enable-libzvbi --enable-lv2 --enable-omx --enable-openal --enable-opencl --enable-opengl --enable-sdl2 --disable-sndio --enable-libjxl --enable-pocketsphinx --enable-librsvg --enable-libmfx --enable-libdc1394 --enable-libdrm --enable-libiec61883 --enable-chromaprint --enable-frei0r --enable-libx264 --enable-libplacebo --enable-librav1e --enable-shared
  libavutil      57. 28.100 / 57. 28.100
  libavcodec     59. 37.100 / 59. 37.100
  libavformat    59. 27.100 / 59. 27.100
  libavdevice    59.  7.100 / 59.  7.100
  libavfilter     8. 44.100 /  8. 44.100
  libswscale      6.  7.100 /  6.  7.100
  libswresample   4.  7.100 /  4.  7.100
  libpostproc    56.  6.100 / 56.  6.100
Splitting the commandline.
Reading option '-loglevel' ... matched as option 'loglevel' (set logging level) with argument 'debug'.
Reading option '-listen' ... matched as AVOption 'listen' with argument '1'.
Reading option '-i' ... matched as input url with argument 'rtmp://127.0.0.1:1935/live/app'.
Reading option './output.wav' ... matched as output url.
Finished splitting the commandline.
Parsing a group of options: global .
Applying option loglevel (set logging level) with argument debug.
Successfully parsed a group of options.
Parsing a group of options: input url rtmp://127.0.0.1:1935/live/app.
Successfully parsed a group of options.
Opening an input file: rtmp://127.0.0.1:1935/live/app.
[NULL @ 0x56288f8e7a00] Opening 'rtmp://127.0.0.1:1935/live/app' for reading
[rtmp @ 0x56288f8e8200] No default whitelist set
[tcp @ 0x56288f8e8d40] No default whitelist set
[rtmp @ 0x56288f8e8200] Proto = rtmp, path = /live/app, app = live, fname = app
[rtmp @ 0x56288f8e8200] New incoming chunk size = 4096
rtmp://127.0.0.1:1935/live/app: Input/output error


    


    The last 3 lines only appear when I start the stream.

    


    It doesn't seems to be a permission problem with the file system, since using ffmpeg -i ./test.mp4 ./output.wav works inside the container.

    


    I also did not find any problem with the network. I am currently using network_mode: "host" in my docker_compose.yml and the logs show that it did receive data before the error appear.

    


    It also doesn't seem to be a problem with the ffmpeg command, since the exact same command works when using it without docker involved.

    


    What else could be the problem ?

    


    here is my docker_compose.yml

    


    version: '3'

services:
  ffmpeg-container:
    build:
      context: .
    network_mode: "host"
    tty: true  # Allocate a pseudo-TTY for interactive use



    


    Dockerfile

    


    FROM python:3

# Install ffmpeg
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y ffmpeg

# Create a working directory
WORKDIR app

# Copy the Python script to the container
COPY app.py .
COPY test.mp4 .

# Run the Python script
CMD ["python", "app.py"]



    


  • FFmpeg Could not write header for output file #0 (incorrect codec parameters ?) : Invalid data found when processing input [closed]

    29 décembre 2023, par randompersonhehe

    I'm having trouble using FFmpeg to host an RTSP server for continuous video streaming. The command I'm using is :

    


    


    ffmpeg -report -v verbose -re -stream_loop -1 -i store-aisle-detection.mp4 -c copy -f rtsp rtsp ://localhost:8888/mystream

    


    


    Log :

    


    ffmpeg started on 2023-12-29 at 15:35:47
Report written to "ffmpeg-20231229-153547.log"
Log level: 48
ffmpeg version 4.4.2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 Copyright (c) 2000-2021 the FFmpeg developers
  built with gcc 11 (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1)
  configuration: --prefix=/usr --extra-version=0ubuntu0.22.04.1 --toolchain=hardened --libdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu --incdir=/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu --arch=amd64 --enable-gpl --disable-stripping --enable-gnutls --enable-ladspa --enable-libaom --enable-libass --enable-libbluray --enable-libbs2b --enable-libcaca --enable-libcdio --enable-libcodec2 --enable-libdav1d --enable-libflite --enable-libfontconfig --enable-libfreetype --enable-libfribidi --enable-libgme --enable-libgsm --enable-libjack --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libmysofa --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopenmpt --enable-libopus --enable-libpulse --enable-librabbitmq --enable-librubberband --enable-libshine --enable-libsnappy --enable-libsoxr --enable-libspeex --enable-libsrt --enable-libssh --enable-libtheora --enable-libtwolame --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-libwebp --enable-libx265 --enable-libxml2 --enable-libxvid --enable-libzimg --enable-libzmq --enable-libzvbi --enable-lv2 --enable-omx --enable-openal --enable-opencl --enable-opengl --enable-sdl2 --enable-pocketsphinx --enable-librsvg --enable-libmfx --enable-libdc1394 --enable-libdrm --enable-libiec61883 --enable-chromaprint --enable-frei0r --enable-libx264 --enable-shared
  libavutil      56. 70.100 / 56. 70.100
  libavcodec     58.134.100 / 58.134.100
  libavformat    58. 76.100 / 58. 76.100
  libavdevice    58. 13.100 / 58. 13.100
  libavfilter     7.110.100 /  7.110.100
  libswscale      5.  9.100 /  5.  9.100
  libswresample   3.  9.100 /  3.  9.100
  libpostproc    55.  9.100 / 55.  9.100
[h264 @ 0x560863a19240] Reinit context to 720x416, pix_fmt: yuv420p
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'store-aisle-detection.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : mp42
    minor_version   : 0
    compatible_brands: mp42mp41
    creation_time   : 2018-07-18T23:51:37.000000Z
  Duration: 00:01:05.49, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 1125 kb/s
  Stream #0:0(eng): Video: h264 (Main), 1 reference frame (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(tv, smpte170m, left), 720x404 (720x416), 1089 kb/s, 59.94 fps, 59.94 tbr, 60k tbn, 119.88 tbc (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2018-07-18T23:51:37.000000Z
      handler_name    : ?Mainconcept Video Media Handler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
      encoder         : AVC Coding
  Stream #0:1(eng): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 24000 Hz, mono, fltp, 30 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2018-07-18T23:51:37.000000Z
      handler_name    : #Mainconcept MP4 Sound Media Handler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
[tcp @ 0x560863b71e80] Starting connection attempt to 127.0.0.1 port 8888
[tcp @ 0x560863b71e80] Successfully connected to 127.0.0.1 port 8888
Could not write header for output file #0 (incorrect codec parameters ?): Invalid data found when processing input
Error initializing output stream 0:1 -- 
Stream mapping:
  Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (copy)
  Stream #0:1 -> #0:1 (copy)
    Last message repeated 1 times
[AVIOContext @ 0x560863a20300] Statistics: 135494 bytes read, 0 seeks




    


    Can anyone help me identify and fix the problem with this command ? I want to loop the video infinitely on the RTSP server. I've tried variations with different formats (e.g., mp4 and ts), but the issue persists.

    


    Any insights into resolving this error would be greatly appreciated.

    


  • Meta Receives a Record GDPR Fine from The Irish Data Protection Commission

    29 mai 2023, par Erin — GDPR

    The Irish Data Protection Commission (the DPC) issued a €1.2 billion fine to Meta on May, 22nd 2023 for violating the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 

    The regulator ruled that Meta was unlawfully transferring European users’ data to its US-based servers and taking no sufficient measures for ensuring users’ privacy. 

    Meta must now suspend data transfer within five months and delete EU/EEA users’ personal data that was illegally transferred across the border. Or they risk facing another round of repercussions. 

    Meta continued to transfer personal user data to the USA following an earlier ruling of The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which already address problematic EU-U.S. data flows. Meta continued those transfers on the basis of the updated Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”), adopted by the European Commission in 2021. 

    The Irish regulator successfully proved that these arrangements had not sufficiently addressed the “fundamental rights and freedoms” of the European data subjects, outlined in the CJEU ruling. Meta was not doing enough to protect EU users’ data against possible surveillance and unconsented usage by US authorities or other authorised entities.

    Why European Regulators Are After The US Big Tech Firms ? 

    GDPR regulations have been a sore area of compliance for US-based big tech companies. 

    Effectively, they had to adopt a host of new measures for collecting user consent, ensuring compliant data storage and the right to request data removal for a substantial part of their user bases. 

    The wrinkle, however, is that companies like Google and Meta among others, don’t have separate data processing infrastructure for different markets. Instead, all the user data gets commingled on the companies’ servers, which are located in the US. 

    Data storage facilities’ location is an issue. In 2020, the CJEU made a historical ruling, called the invalidation of the Privacy Shield. Originally, international companies were allowed to transfer data between the EU and the US if they adhered to seven data protection principles. This arrangement was called the Privacy Shield. 

    However, the continuous investigation found that the Privacy Shield scheme was not GDPR compliant and therefore companies could no longer use it to justify cross-border data transfers.

    The invalidation of the Privacy Shield gave ground for further investigations of the big tech companies’ compliance statuses. 

    In March 2022, the Irish DPC issued the first €17 million fine to Meta for “insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security of European users”. In September 2022, Meta was again hit with a €405 million fine for Instagram breaching GDPR principles. 

    2023 began with another series of rulings, with the DPC concluding that Meta had breaches of the GDPR relating to its Facebook service (€210 million fine) and breaches related to Instagram (€180 million fine). 

    Clearly, Meta already knew they weren’t doing enough for GDPR compliance and yet they refused to take privacy-focused action

    Is Google GDPR Compliant ?

    Google has a similar “track record” as Meta when it comes to ensuring full compliance with the GDPR. Although Google has said to provide users with more controls for managing their data privacy, the proposed solutions are just scratching the surface. 

    In the background, Google continues to leverage its ample reserves of user browsing, behavioural and device data in product development and advertising. 

    In 2022, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) found that Google used web users’ information in its real-time bidding ad system without their knowledge or consent. The French data regulator (CNIL), in turn, fined Google for €150 million because of poor cookie consent banners the same year. 

    Google Analytics GDPR compliance status is, however, the bigger concern.

    Neither Google Univeral Analytics (UA) nor Google Analytics 4 are GDPR compliant, following the Privacy Shield framework invalidation in 2020. 

    Fines from individual regulators in Sweden, France, Austria, Italy, Denmark, Finland and Norway ruled that Google Analytics is non-GDPR compliant and is therefore illegal to use. 

    The regulatory rulings not just affect Google, but also GA users. Because the product is in breach of European privacy laws, people using it are complacent. Privacy groups like noyb, for example, are exercising their right to sue individual websites, using Google Analytics.

    How to Stay GDPR Compliant With Website Analytics 

    To avoid any potential risk exposure, selectively investigate each website analytics provider’s data storage and management practices. 

    Inquire about the company’s data storage locations among the first things. For example, Matomo Cloud keeps all the data in the EU, while Matomo On-Premise edition gives you the option to store data in any country of your choice. 

    Secondly, ask about their process for consent tracking and subsequent data analysis. Our website analytics product is fully GDPR compliant as we have first-party cookies enabled by default, offer a convenient option of tracking out-outs, provide a data removal mechanism and practice safe data storage. In fact, Matomo was approved by the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) as one of the few web analytics apps that can be used to collect data without tracking consent

    Using an in-built GDPR Manager, Matomo users can implement the right set of controls for their market and their industry. For example, you can implement extra data or IP anonymization ; disable visitor logs and profiles. 

    Thanks to our privacy-by-design architecture and native controls, users can make their Matomo analytics compliant even with the strictest privacy laws like HIPAA, CCPA, LGPD and PECR. 

    Learn more about GDPR-friendly website analytics.

    Final Thoughts

    Since the GDPR came into effect in 2018, over 1,400 fines have been given to various companies in breach of the regulations. Meta and Google have been initially lax in response to European regulatory demands. But as new fines follow and the consumer pressure mounts, Big Tech companies are forced to take more proactive measures : add opt-outs for personalised ads and introduce an alternative mechanism to third-party cookies

    Companies, using non-GDPR-compliant tools risk finding themselves in the crossfire of consumer angst and regulatory criticism. To operate an ethical, compliant business consider privacy-focused alternatives to Google products, especially in the area of website analytics.