Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (4707)

• Webm video playing video & audio in Movies & TV app but will only play video in windows media player and html ?

  24 décembre 2019, par Kate LeVering

  I have created a webm video file with transparency with ffmpeg out of a series of png files. Then I add the audio track again in ffmpeg (I have tried both the opus and vorbis codecs). When I play it in the Movies & TV app it plays just fine (audio and video). In windows media player only the video plays. In html (inside a video tag) the video will play if it is set to ’muted’ but if it is not muted it doesn’t play.

  I am not sure what is going on. Does anyone have any insights. Do I need to run the audio from a seperate file ?

  Thanks, Kate

• How to stream the video from one PC to another with an acceptable quality and synchronization ?

  15 juin 2021, par ErickSkrauch

  I have the following task : to organize the broadcast of several gamers on the director's computer, which will switch the image to, to put it simply, the one who currently has more interesting gameplay.

  


  The obvious solution would be to raise an RTMP server and broadcast to it. We tried that. The image quality clearly correlates with the bitrate of the broadcast, but the streams aren't synchronized and there is no way to synchronize them. As far as I know, it's just not built into the RTMP protocol.

  


  We also tried streaming via UDP, SRT and RTSP protocols. We got minimal delay but a very blurry image and artifacts from lost packets. It feels like all these formats are trying to achieve constant FPS and sacrifice the quality.

  


  What we need :

  


  

  • A quality image.

  


  • Broken frames can be discarded (it's okay to have not constant FPS).

  


  • Latency isn't important.

  


  • The streams should be synchronized within a second or two.

  


  


  There is an assumption that broadcasting on UDP should be a solution, but some kind of intermediate buffer is needed to provide the necessary broadcasting conditions. But I don't know how to do that. I assume that we need an intermediate ffmpeg instance, which will read the incoming stream, buffer it and publish the result to some local port, from which the picture will be already taken by the director's OBS.

  


  Is there any solution to achieve our goals ?

  


• Solving The XVD Puzzle

  15 avril 2012, par Multimedia Mike — General, multimedi archaeology, silicon valley, vg2, xvd, zygo

  I downloaded a multimedia file a long time ago (at least, I strongly suspected it was a multimedia file which is why I downloaded it). It went by the name of ‘lamborghini_850kbps.vg2′. I have had it in my collection for at least 7 years. I couldn’t remember where I found it. I downloaded it before it occurred to me to take notes about this sort of stuff.

  I found myself staring at the file again today and Googled the filename. This led me to a few Japanese sites which also contained working URLs for a few more .vg2 samples. Some other clues led me to a Russian language forum where someone had linked to a site that had Win32 codec modules that could process the files. The site was defunct but the Internet Archive Wayback Machine kept a copy for me, as well as copies of several more .vg2 samples from a defunct Japanese site previously involved with this codec.

  Sometimes this internet technology works really well. But I digress.

  Anyway, through all this, I finally found a clue : XVD. and wouldn’t you know, there is already a basic page on the MultimediaWiki describing the technology. In fact, while VG2 is a custom container, the MultimediaWiki states that the video component has a FourCC of VGMV, and there is already a file named VGMV.avi in the root V-codecs/ samples directory, something I vow to correct (that’s a big pet peeve of mine– putting samples in the root V-codecs/ or A-codecs/ directories).

  XVD… XVD… XVD… why does that sound so familiar ? Oh, of course ; there is a company named XVD and they have an office in the Bay Area which I have passed on numerous occasions, like this morning :

  
  <

  Someone originally connected with the multimedia technology in question operates a website which contains an unofficial history of the XVD tech. At first, I was wondering if the technology was completely defunct (and should therefore be open sourced). But if XVD’s solutions page (dated 2010) is to be believed, the technology is still in service, and purported to be better than H.264 and VC-1 : “The current generation of XVD video compression technology provides better video quality at any given data rate than standards-based codecs (H.264 or VC-1) with four times lower encoding complexity (when compared with H.264 Main Profile).”

  If they say so. For my part, I’m just happy that I have finally figured out what this lamborghini_850kbps.vg2 is so that I can properly catalog it on the samples site, which I have now done, along with other samples and various codecs modules.

  This episode reminds me that there’s a branch office of Zygo Corporation close to my home (though the headquarters are far, far away). The companies you see in Silicon Valley. Anyway, long-time open source multimedia hackers will no doubt recognize Zygo from the ZyGo FourCC & video codec transported in QuickTime files that was almost decode-able using an H.263 decoder.

  
  
  

  I may never learn what Zygo’s core competency actually is, but I will always remember their multimedia tech every time I run past their office.