
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (100)
-
MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version
25 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...) -
Multilang : améliorer l’interface pour les blocs multilingues
18 février 2011, parMultilang est un plugin supplémentaire qui n’est pas activé par défaut lors de l’initialisation de MediaSPIP.
Après son activation, une préconfiguration est mise en place automatiquement par MediaSPIP init permettant à la nouvelle fonctionnalité d’être automatiquement opérationnelle. Il n’est donc pas obligatoire de passer par une étape de configuration pour cela. -
Le profil des utilisateurs
12 avril 2011, parChaque utilisateur dispose d’une page de profil lui permettant de modifier ses informations personnelle. Dans le menu de haut de page par défaut, un élément de menu est automatiquement créé à l’initialisation de MediaSPIP, visible uniquement si le visiteur est identifié sur le site.
L’utilisateur a accès à la modification de profil depuis sa page auteur, un lien dans la navigation "Modifier votre profil" est (...)
Sur d’autres sites (9080)
-
FFMPEG show audio frequency waves with border
13 juillet 2020, par Nikhil SolankiI am trying to generate sine waves or audio frequency like
using this command :


ffmpeg -i combine2.mp4 -i image1.png -i song.mp3 -t 20 -filter_complex "[0]split=2[color][alpha]; [color]crop=iw/2:ih:0:0[color]; [alpha]crop=iw/2:ih:iw/2:ih[alpha]; [color][alpha]alphamerge[v1];
[1]scale=540:960, setsar=1[v2];
[2]showfreqs=s=540x100:mode=line:ascale=sqrt:colors=white|red[v3];
[v2][v3] overlay=main_w-overlay_w:main_h-overlay_h-10[v4];
[v4][v1] overlay=1" output_video2.mp4 -y



This command shows frequency of audio with white colour only and also its not smooth as above image. So, how can I generate waves like above image smooth and bordered ?




-
Using ffmpeg create an android playable music slide show
22 avril 2014, par user2637966I am now creating a music slide mp4 video and going to play it in android device with ffmpeg.
I used the following command to accomplish this mission.
The first one is to inputting a batch of jpg files and convert it to a mp4 file.
1.)C:/xampp/htdocs/bin/ffmpeg -y -r 1/5 -i C:/xampp/htdocs/bin/%03d.jpg -c:v libx264 -profile:v baseline -level 3.0 -r 30 -pix_fmt yuv420p C:/xampp/htdocs/bin/out.mp4
The second one is to putting the audio to the previous created video.
2.)C:/xampp/htdocs/bin/ffmpeg -i C:/xampp/htdocs/bin/out.mp4 -i C:/xampp/htdocs/upload/1.mp3 -y -map 0 -map 1 -codec copy -shortest C:/xampp/htdocs/bin/haha.mp4"
Both of the command are correct and created the mp4 file. However only out.mp4 can be played in android deivce while haha.mp4 cannot.
So it seems the audio track violate the android mp4 requirement. What should the second command be so that i can play the mp4 file in android device.
-
Direct Show Video capture performance
23 mai 2019, par Barry AndrewsI originally started out looking for an example of how I can use FFMPEG in c++ builder to create an application to record from usb capture device and playback video because of apparrent poor performance
I tried Mitov components, Datastead, FFMPEGVCL and winsoft camera which use directshow but their capture performance seemed poor.
I need to capture 1920x1080 at up to 60fps into a compressed format and play this back later at both normal speed and slow speed.
What I found was that DirectShow itself has a number of limitations which can be improved by adding things like FFMPEG, but ultimately PC hardware, in particular the HDD and processor limit capture capability.
1920x1080 60fps is basically the upper end for DirectShow so you need to have best performing hardware in order to achieve this sort of performance @Spektre kindly gave me examples of DirectShow using the API direct which were good for comparison with the purchased components.
Using this and comparing to the components I found that MITOV has a major issue with regards the larger video sizes and frame rates. Using this 1920x108 30fps and 60fps can be previewed but they have a massive delay between video feed and preview (5 or 6 seconds). The other components performed similar to the API direct method with only minor variations in performance. None were able to capture and record 1920x108 60fps with any sort of compression filter without large frame drops and very jerky preview.