Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (103)

  • Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins

    27 avril 2010, par

    Mediaspip core
    autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs

  • Support de tous types de médias

    10 avril 2011

    Contrairement à beaucoup de logiciels et autres plate-formes modernes de partage de documents, MediaSPIP a l’ambition de gérer un maximum de formats de documents différents qu’ils soient de type : images (png, gif, jpg, bmp et autres...) ; audio (MP3, Ogg, Wav et autres...) ; vidéo (Avi, MP4, Ogv, mpg, mov, wmv et autres...) ; contenu textuel, code ou autres (open office, microsoft office (tableur, présentation), web (html, css), LaTeX, Google Earth) (...)

  • ANNEXE : Les plugins utilisés spécifiquement pour la ferme

    5 mars 2010, par

    Le site central/maître de la ferme a besoin d’utiliser plusieurs plugins supplémentaires vis à vis des canaux pour son bon fonctionnement. le plugin Gestion de la mutualisation ; le plugin inscription3 pour gérer les inscriptions et les demandes de création d’instance de mutualisation dès l’inscription des utilisateurs ; le plugin verifier qui fournit une API de vérification des champs (utilisé par inscription3) ; le plugin champs extras v2 nécessité par inscription3 (...)

Sur d’autres sites (11741)

  • is it legal/free to use ffmpeg to decode wma/mms stream in a commercial ios app ? [on hold]

    12 mars 2014, par Greg314

    I've been looking for hours but can't find a simple answer to this question : is it legal/free to use ffmpeg to decode wma/mms stream in a commercial ios app ?

    the ffmpeg website clearly states there are legal issues http://www.ffmpeg.org/legal.html

    some people say issues relate to AAC and H264 Licensing questions

    I just need to know if I can use ffmpeg freely to read wma (mms) stream in an ios app, or if I need to pay royalties to Microsoft for that (quite expensive : http://wmlicense.smdisp.net/filePU/WM%20Components%20Final%20Product%20Agreement%20-%20SAMPLE%20%20(10-05-2012).pdf)

    thanks for your help !

    regards

  • Proprietary codecs on Linux. What is legal ?

    17 octobre 2016, par George Eco

    So, assuming we got a distribution without proprietary codecs installed.
    Let’s take Linux Mint for example. I want to store and playback wav and ogg format sounds, either by using my own software, or by using another developer’s software. So far so good right ?

    Imagine now that we have the following scenario. For some reason, I wanna playback a file that is either an mp4 or mp3 or mpeg or any other format, made by proprietary codecs. Instantly, I will need a codec for these formats.

    I read somewhere that Fluendo sells solutions for "legal codec usage" for linux distros.
    URL of fluendo : http://www.fluendo.com/en/

    So here comes the questions :

    Using VLC and ffmpeg is enough for me to convert a file to an ogg or ogv so I can playback a song or a video using an open format. You can also playback playback files made by proprietary formats. But are VLC and ffmpeg legal to use, to playback such files made by proprietary codecs ? For example, ss VLC codecs okay to be used without paying anyone for mp4 playback ? Is it okay to convert a file from mp4 to ogv ?
    If not, are there any legal and open source and free (as in freedom) codecs around that can solve the issue, or does someone have to pay a product, to be ethically correct, to the developers of the proprietaty codecs ?

    Note that I do not ask for Windows, since codec licenses are included to the price of the operating system. I ask exclusively for a free linux distribution.

  • Internecine Legal Threats

    1er juin 2011, par Multimedia Mike — Legal/Ethical

    FFmpeg and associated open source multimedia projects such as xine, MPlayer, and VLC have long had a rebel mystique about them ; a bunch of hackers playing fast and loose with IP law in order to give the world the free multimedia experience it deserved. We figured out the algorithms using any tools available, including the feared technique of binary reverse engineering. When I gave a presentation about FFmpeg at Linuxtag in 2007, I created this image illustrating said mystique :



    It garnered laughs. But I made the point that we multimedia hackers just press on, doing our thing while ignoring legal threats. The policy has historically worked out famously for us– to date, I seem to be the only person on the receiving end of a sort-of legal threat from the outside world.

    Who would have thought that the most credible legal threat to an open source multimedia project would emanate from a fork of that very project ? Because that’s exactly what has transpired :



    Click for full threat

    So it came to pass that Michael Niedermayer — the leader of the FFmpeg project — received a bona fide legal nastygram from Mans Rullgard, a representative of the FFmpeg-forked Libav project. The subject of dispute is a scorched-earth matter involving the somewhat iconic FFmpeg zigzag logo :

     
    Original 2D logo enhanced 3D logo

    To think of all those years we spent worrying about legal threats from organizations outside the community. I’m reminded of that time-honored horror trope/urban legend staple : Get out ! The legal threats are coming from inside the house !

    I’m interested to see how this all plays out, particularly regarding jurisdiction, as we have a U.K. resident engaging an Italian lawyer outfit to deliver a legal threat to an Austrian citizen regarding an image hosted on a server in Hungary. I suspect I know why that law firm was chosen, but it’s still a curious jurisdictional setup.

    People often used to ask me if we multimedia hackers would get sued to death for doing what we do. My response was always, “There’s only one way to know for sure,” by which I meant that we would just have to engage in said shady activities and determine empirically if lawsuits resulted. So I’m a strong advocate for experimentation to push the limits. Kudos to Michael and Mans for volunteering to push the legal limits.