Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/metadatas

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (52)

  • Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond

    5 septembre 2013, par

    Certains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;

  • La file d’attente de SPIPmotion

    28 novembre 2010, par

    Une file d’attente stockée dans la base de donnée
    Lors de son installation, SPIPmotion crée une nouvelle table dans la base de donnée intitulée spip_spipmotion_attentes.
    Cette nouvelle table est constituée des champs suivants : id_spipmotion_attente, l’identifiant numérique unique de la tâche à traiter ; id_document, l’identifiant numérique du document original à encoder ; id_objet l’identifiant unique de l’objet auquel le document encodé devra être attaché automatiquement ; objet, le type d’objet auquel (...)

  • Publier sur MédiaSpip

    13 juin 2013

    Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
    Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir

Sur d’autres sites (9190)

  • How can I preview and republish a webcam stream with ffmpeg and PowerShell ? (Non-blocking buffered named pipe in Powershell)

    30 octobre 2020, par Marvin Irwin

    My question is a duplicate of this, except for powershell, however in the interest of avoiding the XY problem I'll describe my objective.

    


    I'd like to use ffmpeg to create a preview of my webcam, while broadcasting to another process which would like to use the video.

    


    I figure I'll created a named pipe in PowerShell, and use ffmpeg to preview the webcam with sdl while writing the output to the pipe and letting other process eavesdrop on it.

    


    $pipe = New-Object System.IO.Pipes.NamedPipeServerStream('webcam', [System.IO.Pipes.PipeDirection]::Out);

ffmpeg.exe `
-y `
-f dshow `
-i "video=vide_source:audio=audio_source" `
-f mjpeg \\.\\pipe\\webcam `
-pix_fmt yuv420p -window_x 0 -window_y 0 -f sdl :0 


    


    After running this command for a few seconds, ffmpeg warns me that my real-time buffer is full.

    


    How can I accept a pipe which accepts and emits/discards data immediately ?

    


  • inline asm : fix arrays as named constraints.

    7 mai 2014, par Matt Oliver
    inline asm : fix arrays as named constraints.
    

    Signed-off-by : Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>

    • [DH] libavcodec/x86/cabac.h
    • [DH] libavcodec/x86/h264_i386.h
    • [DH] libavcodec/x86/idct_sse2_xvid.c
    • [DH] libavcodec/x86/lpc.c
    • [DH] libavutil/x86/asm.h
    • [DH] libswresample/x86/resample_mmx.h
    • [DH] libswscale/x86/yuv2rgb_template.c
  • FFMPEG filter using named pipe for I/O to a forked program and legal consideration [closed]

    17 septembre 2021, par alexbuisson

    I would like to develop a ffmpeg filter to have an easier and better integration of the ffmpeg functionalities in case of complex command lines.

    &#xA;&#xA;

    Imagine an ffmpeg command line in which you can configure a filter that will use to configure a 3rd party executable to fork and use named pipe to pass video through that external tools.

    &#xA;&#xA;

    Technically I can write it, but the question is, is it legal from FFMPEG license point of view (FFMPEG can be GPL or LGPL depending of how it has been built). As far as I understand, if I have an executable called "my_video_transformation.exe" (no relationship with ffmpeg, it just read input pipe and write to output pipe)

    &#xA;&#xA;

    It's ok for a user to run the following :

    &#xA;&#xA;

    &#xA;

    (FFMPEG GPL or LGPL).exe decoding_args | my_video_transformation.exe | (FFMPEG GPL or LGPL).exe encoding_args

    &#xA;

    &#xA;&#xA;

    But it's not ok if a user can run something similar to :

    &#xA;&#xA;

    &#xA;

    (FFMPEG GPL or LGPL).exe filter="my_video_transformation.exe" transcoding_args

    &#xA;

    &#xA;&#xA;

    from my understanding of https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLPlugins

    &#xA;&#xA;

    As soon as you write in a GPL or LGPL executable something that can fork and communicate with 3rd party and by the way maybe a commercial executable, it doesn't respect the license ?

    &#xA;&#xA;

    Maybe not the correct place to ask, but would like to have some feedback before starting that project. FFMPEG dev community will reject my code proposal if it's not legal or even border line.

    &#xA;&#xA;

    Regards

    &#xA;