Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow
28 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Octobre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Texte
Autres articles (55)
-
La file d’attente de SPIPmotion
28 novembre 2010, parUne file d’attente stockée dans la base de donnée
Lors de son installation, SPIPmotion crée une nouvelle table dans la base de donnée intitulée spip_spipmotion_attentes.
Cette nouvelle table est constituée des champs suivants : id_spipmotion_attente, l’identifiant numérique unique de la tâche à traiter ; id_document, l’identifiant numérique du document original à encoder ; id_objet l’identifiant unique de l’objet auquel le document encodé devra être attaché automatiquement ; objet, le type d’objet auquel (...) -
Websites made with MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parThis page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.
-
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)
Sur d’autres sites (6919)
-
avcodec/videotoolbox : Fix undefined symbol with minimal configuration
4 janvier 2022, par Limin Wangavcodec/videotoolbox : Fix undefined symbol with minimal configuration
Please reproduced with the following minimal configure command :
./configure —enable-shared —disable-all —enable-avcodec —enable-decoder=h264 —enable-hwaccel=h264_videotoolboxYou'll get below error :
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 :
"_ff_videotoolbox_vpcc_extradata_create", referenced from :
_videotoolbox_start in videotoolbox.o
ld : symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
clang : error : linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)Reported-by : Cameron Gutman <aicommander@gmail.com>
Tested-by : Cameron Gutman <aicommander@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by : Limin Wang <lance.lmwang@gmail.com> -
Why is ffmpeg faster than this minimal example ?
23 juillet 2022, par Dave CeddiaI'm wanting to read the audio out of a video file as fast as possible, using the libav libraries. It's all working fine, but it seems like it could be faster.


To get a performance baseline, I ran this ffmpeg command and timed it :


time ffmpeg -threads 1 -i file -map 0:a:0 -f null -


On a test file (a 2.5gb 2hr .MOV with pcm_s16be audio) this comes out to about 1.35 seconds on my M1 Macbook Pro.


On the other hand, this minimal C code (based on FFmpeg's "Demuxing and decoding" example) is consistently around 0.3 seconds slower.


#include <libavcodec></libavcodec>avcodec.h>
#include <libavformat></libavformat>avformat.h>

static int decode_packet(AVCodecContext *dec, const AVPacket *pkt, AVFrame *frame)
{
 int ret = 0;

 // submit the packet to the decoder
 ret = avcodec_send_packet(dec, pkt);

 // get all the available frames from the decoder
 while (ret >= 0) {
 ret = avcodec_receive_frame(dec, frame);
 av_frame_unref(frame);
 }

 return 0;
}

int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
 int ret = 0;
 AVFormatContext *fmt_ctx = NULL;
 AVCodecContext *dec_ctx = NULL;
 AVFrame *frame = NULL;
 AVPacket *pkt = NULL;

 if (argc != 3) {
 exit(1);
 }

 int stream_idx = atoi(argv[2]);

 /* open input file, and allocate format context */
 avformat_open_input(&fmt_ctx, argv[1], NULL, NULL);

 /* get the stream */
 AVStream *st = fmt_ctx->streams[stream_idx];

 /* find a decoder for the stream */
 AVCodec *dec = avcodec_find_decoder(st->codecpar->codec_id);

 /* allocate a codec context for the decoder */
 dec_ctx = avcodec_alloc_context3(dec);

 /* copy codec parameters from input stream to output codec context */
 avcodec_parameters_to_context(dec_ctx, st->codecpar);

 /* init the decoder */
 avcodec_open2(dec_ctx, dec, NULL);

 /* allocate frame and packet structs */
 frame = av_frame_alloc();
 pkt = av_packet_alloc();

 /* read frames from the specified stream */
 while (av_read_frame(fmt_ctx, pkt) >= 0) {
 if (pkt->stream_index == stream_idx)
 ret = decode_packet(dec_ctx, pkt, frame);

 av_packet_unref(pkt);
 if (ret < 0)
 break;
 }

 /* flush the decoders */
 decode_packet(dec_ctx, NULL, frame);

 return ret < 0;
}


I tried measuring parts of this program to see if it was spending a lot of time in the setup, but it's not – at least 1.5 seconds of the runtime is the loop where it's reading frames.


So I took some flamegraph recordings (using cargo-flamegraph) and ran each a few times to make sure the timing was consistent. There's probably some overhead since both were consistently higher than running normally, but they still have the 0.3 second delta.


# 1.812 total
time sudo flamegraph ./minimal file 1

# 1.542 total
time sudo flamegraph ffmpeg -threads 1 -i file -map 0:a:0 -f null - 2>&1


Here are the flamegraphs stacked up, scaled so that the faster one is only 85% as wide as the slower one. (click for larger)




The interesting thing that stands out to me is how long is spent on
readin the minimal example vs. ffmpeg :



The time spent on
lseekis also a lot longer in the minimal program – it's plainly visible in that flamegraph, but in the ffmpeg flamegraph,lseekis a single pixel wide.

What's causing this discrepancy ? Is ffmpeg actually doing less work than I think it is here ? Is the minimal code doing something naive ? Is there some buffering or other I/O optimizations that ffmpeg has enabled ?


How can I shave 0.3 seconds off of the minimal example's runtime ?


-
avcodec/dpx : fix check of minimal data size for unpadded content
19 octobre 2022, par Jerome Martinezavcodec/dpx : fix check of minimal data size for unpadded content
stride value is not relevant with unpadded content and the total count
of pixels (width x height) must be used instead of the rounding based on
width only then multiplied by heightunpadded_10bit value computing is moved sooner in the code in order to
be able to use it during computing of minimal content size. Also make sure to
only set it for 10bit.Fix 'Overread buffer' error when the content is not lucky enough to have
(enough) padding bytes at the end for not being rejected by the formula
based on the stride valueFixes ticket #10259.
Signed-off-by : Jerome Martinez <jerome@mediaarea.net>
Signed-off-by : Marton Balint <cus@passwd.hu>
Syndiquer tout le site
