
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
The Slip - Artworks
26 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Texte
Autres articles (30)
-
La file d’attente de SPIPmotion
28 novembre 2010, parUne file d’attente stockée dans la base de donnée
Lors de son installation, SPIPmotion crée une nouvelle table dans la base de donnée intitulée spip_spipmotion_attentes.
Cette nouvelle table est constituée des champs suivants : id_spipmotion_attente, l’identifiant numérique unique de la tâche à traiter ; id_document, l’identifiant numérique du document original à encoder ; id_objet l’identifiant unique de l’objet auquel le document encodé devra être attaché automatiquement ; objet, le type d’objet auquel (...) -
Les formats acceptés
28 janvier 2010, parLes commandes suivantes permettent d’avoir des informations sur les formats et codecs gérés par l’installation local de ffmpeg :
ffmpeg -codecs ffmpeg -formats
Les format videos acceptés en entrée
Cette liste est non exhaustive, elle met en exergue les principaux formats utilisés : h264 : H.264 / AVC / MPEG-4 AVC / MPEG-4 part 10 m4v : raw MPEG-4 video format flv : Flash Video (FLV) / Sorenson Spark / Sorenson H.263 Theora wmv :
Les formats vidéos de sortie possibles
Dans un premier temps on (...) -
Contribute to documentation
13 avril 2011Documentation is vital to the development of improved technical capabilities.
MediaSPIP welcomes documentation by users as well as developers - including : critique of existing features and functions articles contributed by developers, administrators, content producers and editors screenshots to illustrate the above translations of existing documentation into other languages
To contribute, register to the project users’ mailing (...)
Sur d’autres sites (5052)
-
x264 library speed - Altivec vs SSE2 -
25 février 2013, par Omer MerdanI have simple cheap dualcore intel-3ghz-debian and access to super-expensive powerPc7-Aix.
And after few days of strugle, i compiled libx264 and tested it on both computers :
- GCC : library x264 on intel (with SSE2 capabilities) and
- GCC on 16 core powerPc (with altivec).
... and result is that cheap intel is x2 times faster ! (with altivec disabled, intel is 10x times faster)
My question : is this normal ?
Does all other powerPC-users have same results ? Can powerPc-altivec-optimisation of x264 library work at same speed with intel... or MMX/SSE optimisation is officially at least 2 times faster for this library ?I am not interested in multi-thread options. Number of cores and threads are irrelevant. Just simple one-thread x264 encoding with default "medium preset" using rawvideo as source, sse vs altivec.
Maybe native Aix XLC compiler provide better results ? (i managed only gcc to work)
... mac-powerpc-users maybe know something about this.
powrPc7-Aix:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: 64-bit XCOFF
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: Altivec
time: real 0m33.559s
---
intelDebian:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: ELF 32-bit LSB executable
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
time: real 0m16.503s -
x264 library speed - Altivec vs SSE2 -
25 février 2013, par Omer MerdanI have simple cheap dualcore intel-3ghz-debian and access to super-expensive powerPc7-Aix.
And after few days of strugle, i compiled libx264 and tested it on both computers :
- GCC : library x264 on intel (with SSE2 capabilities) and
- GCC on 16 core powerPc (with altivec).
... and result is that cheap intel is x2 times faster ! (with altivec disabled, intel is 10x times faster)
My question : is this normal ?
Does all other powerPC-users have same results ? Can powerPc-altivec-optimisation of x264 library work at same speed with intel... or MMX/SSE optimisation is officially at least 2 times faster for this library ?I am not interested in multi-thread options. Number of cores and threads are irrelevant. Just simple one-thread x264 encoding with default "medium preset" using rawvideo as source, sse vs altivec.
Maybe native Aix XLC compiler provide better results ? (i managed only gcc to work)
... mac-powerpc-users maybe know something about this.
powrPc7-Aix:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: 64-bit XCOFF
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: Altivec
time: real 0m33.559s
---
intelDebian:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: ELF 32-bit LSB executable
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
time: real 0m16.503s -
x264 library speed - Altivec vs SSE4 -
15 août 2015, par Asain KujovicI have simple cheap dualcore intel-3ghz-debian and access to super-expensive powerPc7-Aix.
And after few days of strugle, i compiled libx264 and tested it on both computers :
- GCC : library x264 on intel (with SSE2 capabilities) and
- GCC on 16 core powerPc (with altivec).
... and result is that cheap intel is x2 times faster ! (with altivec disabled, intel is 10x times faster)
My question : is this normal ?
Does all other powerPC-users have same results ? Can powerPc-altivec-optimisation of x264 library work at same speed with intel... or MMX/SSE optimisation is officially at least 2 times faster for this library ?I am not interested in multi-thread options. Number of cores and threads are irrelevant. Just simple one-thread x264 encoding with default "medium preset" using rawvideo as source, sse vs altivec.
Maybe native Aix XLC compiler provide better results ? (i managed only gcc to work)
... mac-powerpc-users maybe know something about this.
powrPc7-Aix:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: 64-bit XCOFF
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: Altivec
time: real 0m33.559s
---
intelDebian:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: ELF 32-bit LSB executable
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
time: real 0m16.503s