
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
The pirate bay depuis la Belgique
1er avril 2013, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
Autres articles (35)
-
Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins
27 avril 2010, parMediaspip core
autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs -
Supporting all media types
13 avril 2011, parUnlike most software and media-sharing platforms, MediaSPIP aims to manage as many different media types as possible. The following are just a few examples from an ever-expanding list of supported formats : images : png, gif, jpg, bmp and more audio : MP3, Ogg, Wav and more video : AVI, MP4, OGV, mpg, mov, wmv and more text, code and other data : OpenOffice, Microsoft Office (Word, PowerPoint, Excel), web (html, CSS), LaTeX, Google Earth and (...)
-
La file d’attente de SPIPmotion
28 novembre 2010, parUne file d’attente stockée dans la base de donnée
Lors de son installation, SPIPmotion crée une nouvelle table dans la base de donnée intitulée spip_spipmotion_attentes.
Cette nouvelle table est constituée des champs suivants : id_spipmotion_attente, l’identifiant numérique unique de la tâche à traiter ; id_document, l’identifiant numérique du document original à encoder ; id_objet l’identifiant unique de l’objet auquel le document encodé devra être attaché automatiquement ; objet, le type d’objet auquel (...)
Sur d’autres sites (6864)
-
lavc/opusdsp : simplify R-V V postfilter
16 décembre 2023, par Rémi Denis-Courmontlavc/opusdsp : simplify R-V V postfilter
This skips the round-trip to scalar register for the sliding 'x'
coefficients, improving performance by about 5%. The trick here is that
the vector slide-up instruction preserves elements in destination vector
until the slide offset.The switch from vfslide1up.vf to vslideup.vi also allows the elimination
of data dependencies on consecutive slides. Since the specifications
recommend sticking to power of two offsets, we could slide as follows :vslideup.vi v8, v0, 2
vslideup.vi v4, v0, 1
vslideup.vi v12, v8, 1
vslideup.vi v16, v8, 2However in the device under test, this seems to make performance slightly
worse, so this is left for (in)validation with future better hardware. -
Converting a H.264-Stream with node.js using fluent-ffmpeg
10 novembre 2014, par Andreas LacknerI want to convert a H.264 stream (provided by a foscam via RTSP) into a ogg-stream (via HTTP) using node.js and ffmpeg.
So far I tried it with VLC, wich works fine. But VLC needs too much CPU power.I’ve tried the following :
var ffmpeg = require('fluent-ffmpeg');
var http = require('http');
http.createServer(function (req, res) {
var command = ffmpeg();
command.input('rtsp://user:password@foscam.example.com:88/videoMain');
command.inputFormat('rtsp');
command.videoCodec('libtheora');
command.audioCodec('libvorbis');
command.toFormat('ogg');
console.log('New Request');
res.writeHead('200', {
'Content-Type' : 'video/ogg',
'Connection' : 'keep-alive',
"Accept-Ranges" : "bytes"
});
command.on('error', function(err, stdout, stderr) {
console.log("error:"+err);
console.log('ffmpeg stdout: ' + stdout);
console.log('ffmpeg stderr: ' + stderr);
});
command.output(res);
}).listen(8080, 'localhost');If I try to open the stream with VLC, I don’t get any response.
Does anybody know what’s wrong ? -
Thread count option in FFmpeg for FASTEST conversion to h264 ?
9 février, par S BI need to maximize speed while converting videos using FFmpeg to h264



- 

- Any input format of source videos
- User's machine can have any number of cores
- Power and memory consumption are non-issues









Of course, there are a whole bunch of options that can be tweaked but this question is particularly about choosing the best
-thread <count></count>
option. I am trying to find an ideal thread count as a function of


- 

- no. of cores
- input video format
- h264-friendly values maybe ?
- anything else missed above ?











I am aware the default
-thread 0
follows one-thread-per-core approach which is supposed to be optimal. But I am not sure if this is time or space-optimized. Also, on certain testcases, I've seen more threads (say 4 threads on my dual core test machine) finishes quicker than the default.


Any other direction, say configure options w.r.t. threads, worth pursuing ?