
Recherche avancée
Médias (91)
-
Spitfire Parade - Crisis
15 mai 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Wired NextMusic
14 mai 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Février 2012
Langue : English
Type : Video
-
Video d’abeille en portrait
14 mai 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Février 2012
Langue : français
Type : Video
-
Sintel MP4 Surround 5.1 Full
13 mai 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Février 2012
Langue : English
Type : Video
-
Carte de Schillerkiez
13 mai 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Texte
-
Publier une image simplement
13 avril 2011, par kent1, Webmaster - Bij de Brest
Mis à jour : Février 2012
Langue : français
Type : Video
Autres articles (59)
-
Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond
5 septembre 2013, par kent1Certains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;
-
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir -
Encoding and processing into web-friendly formats
13 avril 2011, par kent1MediaSPIP automatically converts uploaded files to internet-compatible formats.
Video files are encoded in MP4, Ogv and WebM (supported by HTML5) and MP4 (supported by Flash).
Audio files are encoded in MP3 and Ogg (supported by HTML5) and MP3 (supported by Flash).
Where possible, text is analyzed in order to retrieve the data needed for search engine detection, and then exported as a series of image files.
All uploaded files are stored online in their original format, so you can (...)
Sur d’autres sites (4265)
-
5 Top Google Optimize Alternatives to Consider
17 mars 2023, par Erin — Analytics TipsGoogle Optimize is a popular conversion rate optimization (CRO) tool from Alphabet (parent company of Google). With it, you can run A/B, multivariate, and redirect tests to figure out which web page designs perform best.
Google Optimize seamlessly integrates with Google Analytics (GA). It also has a free tier. So many marketers chose it as their default A/B testing tool…until recently.
Google will sunset Google Optimize by 30 September 2023.
Starting from this date, Google will no longer support Optimize and Optimize 360 (premium edition). All experiments, active after this date, will be paused automatically and you’ll no longer have access to your historical records (unless these are exported in advance).
The better news is that you still have time to find a Google Optimize alternative — and this post will help you with that.
Disclaimer : Please note that the information provided in this blog post is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal advice. Every situation is unique and requires a specific legal analysis. If you have any questions regarding the legal implications of any matter, please consult with your legal team or seek advice from a qualified legal professional.
Best Google Optimize Alternatives
Google Optimize was among the first free A/B testing apps. But as with any product, it has some disadvantages.
Data updates happen every 24 hours, not in real-time. A free account has caps on the number of experiments. You cannot run more than 5 experiments at a time or implement over 16 combinations for multivariate testing (MVT). A premium version (Optimize 365) has fewer usage constraints, but it costs north of $150K per year.
Google Optimize has native integration with GA (of course), so you can review all the CRO data without switching apps. But Optimize doesn’t work well with Google Analytics alternatives, which many choose to use for privacy-friendly user tracking, higher data accuracy and GDPR compliance.
At the same time, many other conversion rate optimization (CRO) tools have emerged, often boasting better accuracy and more competitive features than Google Optimize.
Here are 5 alternative A/B testing apps worth considering.
Adobe Target
Adobe Target is an advanced personalization platform for optimising user and marketing experiences on digital properties. It uses machine learning algorithms to deliver dynamic content, personalised promotions and custom browsing experiences to visitors based on their behaviour and demographic data.
Adobe Target also provides A/B testing and multivariate testing (MVT) capabilities to help marketers test and refine their digital experiences.
Key features :
- Visual experience builder for A/B tests setup and replication
- Full factorial multivariate tests and multi-armed bandit testing
- Omnichannel personalisation across web properties
- Multiple audience segmentation and targeting options
- Personalised content, media and product recommendations
- Advanced customer intelligence (in conjunction with other Adobe products)
Pros
- Convenient A/B test design tool
- Acucate MVT and MAB results
- Powerful segmentation capabilities
- Access to extra behavioural analytics
- One-click personalisation activation
- Supports rules-based, location-based and contextual personalisation
- Robust omnichannel analytics in conjunction with other Adobe products
Cons
- Requires an Adobe Marketing Cloud subscription
- No free trial or freemium tier
- More complex product setup and configuration
- Steep learning curve for new users
Price : On-demand.
Adobe Target is sold as part of Adobe Marketing Cloud. Licence costs vary, based on selected subscriptions and the number of users, but are typically above $10K.
Google Optimize vs Adobe Target : The Verdict
Google Optimize comes with a free tier, unlike Adobe Target. It provides you with a basic builder for A/B and MVT tests, but none of the personalisation tools Adobe has. Because of ease-of-use and low price, other Google Optimize alternatives are better suited for small to medium-sized businesses, doing baseline CRO for funnel optimisation.
Adobe Target pulls you into the vast Adobe marketing ecosystem, offering omnipotent customer behaviour analytics, machine-learning-driven website optimisation, dynamic content recommendations, product personalisation and extensive reporting. The app is better suited for larger enterprises with a significant investment in digital marketing.
Matomo A/B Testing
Matomo A/B Testing is a CRO tool, integrated into Matomo. All Matomo Cloud users get instant access to it, while On-Premise (free) Matomo users can purchase A/B testing as a plugin.
With Matomo A/B Testing, you can create multiple variations of a web or mobile page and test them with different segments of their audience. Matomo also doesn’t have any strict experiment caps, unlike Google Optimize.
You can split-test multiple creative variants for on-site assets such as buttons, slogans, titles, call-to-actions, image positions and more. You can even benchmark the performance of two (or more !) completely different homepage designs, for instance.
With us, you can compliantly and ethically collect historical user data about any visitor, who’s entered any of the active tests — and monitor their entire customer journey. You can also leverage Matomo A/B Testing data as part of multi-touch attribution modelling to determine which channels bring the best leads and which assets drive them towards conversion.
Since Matomo A/B Testing is part of our analytics platform, it works well with other features such as goal tracking, heatmaps, user session recordings and more.
Key features
- Run experiments for web, mobile, email and digital campaigns
- Convenient A/B test design interface
- One-click experiment scheduling
- Integration with historic visitor profiles
- Near real-time conversion tracking
- Apply segmentation to Matomo reports
- Easy creative variation sharing via a URL
Pros
- High data accuracy with no reporting gaps
- Monitor the evolution of your success metrics for each variation
- Embed experiments across multiple digital channels
- Set a custom confidence threshold for winning variations
- No compromises on user privacy
- Free 21-day trial available (for Matomo Cloud) and free 30-day plugin trial (for Matomo On-Premise)
Cons
- No on-site personalisation tools available
- Configuration requires some coding experience
Price : Matomo A/B Testing is included in the monthly Cloud plan (starting at €19 per month). On-Premise users can buy this functionality as a plugin (starting at €199/year).
Google Optimize vs Matomo A/B Testing : The Verdict
Matomo offers the same types of A/B testing features as Google Optimize (and some extras !), but without any usage caps. Unlike Matomo, Google Optimize doesn’t support A/B tests for mobile apps. You can access some content testing features for Android Apps via Firebase, but this requires another subscription.
Matomo lets you run A/B experiments across the web and mobile properties, plus desktop apps, email campaigns and digital ads. Also, Matomo has higher conversion data accuracy, thanks to our privacy-focused method for collecting website analytics.
When using Matomo in most EU markets, you’re legally exempt from showing a cookie consent banner. Meaning you can collect richer insights for each experiment and make data-driven decisions. Nearly 40% of global consumers reject cookie consent banners. With most other tools, you won’t be getting the full picture of your traffic.
Optimizely
Optimizely is a conversion optimization platform that offers several competitive products for a separate subscription. These include a flexible content management system (CMS), a content marketing platform, a web A/B testing app, a mobile featuring testing product and two eCommerce-specific website management products.
The Web Experimentation app allows you to optimise every customer touchpoint by scheduling unlimited split or multi-variant tests and conversions across all your projects from the same app. Apart from websites, this subscription also supports experiments for single-page applications. But if you want more advanced mobile app testing features, you’ll have to purchase another product — Feature Experimentation.
Key features :
- Intuitive experiment design tool
- Cross-browser testing and experiment preview
- Multi-page funnel tests design
- Behavioural and geo-targeting
- Exit/bounce rate tracking
- Custom audience builder for experiments
- Comprehensive reporting
Pros
- Unlimited number of concurrent experiments
- Upload your audience data for test optimisation
- Dynamic content personalisation available on a higher tier
- Pre-made integrations with popular heatmap and analytics tools
- Supports segmentation by device, campaign type, traffic sources or referrer
Cons
- You need a separate subscription for mobile CRO
- Free trial not available, pricing on-demand
- Multiple licences and subscriptions may be required
- Doesn’t support A/B tests for emails
Price : Available on-demand.
Web Experimentation tool has three subscription tiers — Grow, Accelerate, and Scale with different features included.
Google Optimize vs Optimizely : The Verdict
Optimizely is a strong contender for Google Optimize alternative as it offers more advanced audience targeting and segmentation options. You can target users by IP address, cookies, traffic sources, device type, browser, language, location or a custom utm_campaign parameter.
Similar to Matomo A/B testing, Optimizely doesn’t limit the number of projects or concurrent experiments you can do. But you have to immediately sign an annual contract (no monthly plans are available). Pricing also varies based on the number of processed impressions (more experiments = a higher annual bill). An annual licence can cost $63,700 for 10 million impressions on average, according to an independent estimate.
Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
VWO is another popular experimentation platform, supporting web, mobile and server-side A/B testing and personalisation campaigns.
Similar to others, VWO offers a drag-and-drop visual editor for creating campaign variants. You don’t need design or coding knowledge to create tests. Once you’re all set, the app will benchmark your experiment performance against expected conversion rates, report on differences in conversion rate and point towards the best-performing creative.
Similar to Optimizely, VWO also offers web/mobile app optimisation as a separate subscription. Apart from testing visual page elements, you can also run in-app experiments throughout the product stack to locate new revenue opportunities. For example, you can test in-app subscription flows, search algorithms or navigation flows to improve product UX.
Key features :
- Multivariate and multi-arm bandit tests
- Multi-step (funnel) split tests
- Collaborative experiment tracking dashboard
- Target users by different attributes (URL, device, geo-data)
- Personal library of creative elements
- Funnel analytics, session records, and heatmaps available
Pros
- Free starter plan is available (similar to Google Optimize)
- Simple tracking code installation and easy code editor
- Offers online reporting dashboards and report downloads
- Slice-and-dice reports by different audience dimensions
- No impact on website/app loading speed and performance
Cons
- Multivariate testing is only available on a higher-tier plan
- Annual contract required, despite monthly billing
- Mobile app A/B split tests require another licence
- Requires ongoing user training
Price : Free limited plan available.
Then from $356/month, billed annually.
Google Optimize vs VWO : The Verdict
The free plan on VWO is very similar to Google Optimize. You get access to A/B testing and split URL testing features for websites only. The visual editing tool is relatively simple — and you can use URL or device targeting.
Free VWO reports, however, lack the advertised depth in terms of behavioural or funnel-based reporting. In-depth insights are available only to premium users. Extra advertised features like heatmaps, form analytics and session recordings require yet another subscription. With Matomo Cloud, you get all three of these together with A/B testing.
ConvertFlow
ConvertFlow markets itself as a funnel optimisation app for eCommerce and SaaS companies. It meshes lead generation tools with some CRO workflows.
With ConvertFlow, you can effortlessly design opt-in forms, pop-ups, quizzes and even entire landing pages using pre-made web elements and a visual builder. Afterwards, you can put all of these assets to a “field test” via the ConvertFlow CRO platform. Select among pre-made templates or create custom variants for split or multivariate testing. You can customise tests based on URLs, cookie data and user geolocation among other factors.
Similar to Adobe Target, ConvertFlow also allows you to run tests targeted at specific customer segments in your CRM. The app has native integrations with HubSpot and Salesforce, so this feature is easy to enable. ConvertFlow also offers advanced targeting and segmentation options, based on user on-site behaviour, demographics data or known interests.
Key features :
- Create and test landing pages, surveys, quizzes, pop-ups, surveys and other lead-gen assets.
- All-in-one funnel builder for creating demand-generation campaigns
- Campaign personalisation, based on on-site activity
- Re-usable dynamic visitor segments for targeting
- Multi-step funnel design and customisation
- Embedded forms for split testing CTAs on existing pages
Pros
- Allows controlling the traffic split for each variant to get objective results
- Pre-made integration with Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager
- Conversion and funnel reports, available for each variant
- Access to a library with 300+ conversion campaign templates
- Apply progressive visitor profiling to dynamically adjust user experiences
Cons
- Each plan covers only $10K views. Each extra 10k costs another $20/mo
- Only one website allowed per account (except for Teams plan)
- Doesn’t support experiments in mobile app
- Not all CRO features are available on a Pro plan.
Price : Access to CRO features costs from $300/month on a Pro plan. Subscription costs also increase, based on the total number of monthly views.
Google Optimize vs CovertFlow : The Verdict
ConvertFlow is equally convenient to use in conjunction with Google Analytics as Google Optimize is. But the similarities end up here since ConvertFlow combines funnel design features with CRO tools.
With ConvertFlow, you can run more advanced experiments and apply more targeting criteria than with Google Optimize. You can observe user behaviour and conversion rates across multi-step CTA forms and page funnels, plus benefit from first-touch attribution reporting without switching apps.
Though CovertFlow has a free plan, it doesn’t include access to CRO features. Meaning it’s not a free alternative to Google Optimize.
Comparison of the Top 5 Google Optimize Alternatives
Feature Google Optimize Adobe Target Matomo A/B test Optimizely VWO ConvertFlow
Supported channels Web Web, mobile, social media, email Web, mobile, email, digital campaigns Websites & mobile apps Websites, web and mobile apps Websites and mobile apps A/B testing Easy GA integration Integrations with other web analytics apps Audience segmentation Basic Advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced Geo-targeting Behavioural targeting Basic Advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced Heatmaps
No extra cost with Matomo Cloud〰️
*via integrations〰️
*requires another subscriptionSession recordings
No extra cost with Matomo Cloud〰️
*requires another subscriptionMultivariate testing (MVT) Dynamic personalisation 〰️
*only on higher account tiers〰️
*only on the highest account tiersProduct recommendations 〰️
*requires another subscription〰️
*requires another subscription
Support Self-help desk on a free tier Email, live-chat, phone support Email, self-help guides and user forum Knowledge base, online tickets, user community Self-help guides, email, phone Knowledge base, email, and live chat support Price Freemium On-demand From €19 for Cloud subscription
From €199/year as plugin for On-PremiseOn-demand Freemium
From $365/moFrom $300/month Conclusion
Google Optimize has served marketers well for over five years. But as the company decided to move on — so should you.
Oher A/B testing tools like Matomo, Optimizely or VWO offer better funnel analytics and split testing capabilities without any usage caps. Also, tools like Adobe Target, Optimizely, and VWO offer advanced content personalisation, based on aggregate analytics. However, they also come with much higher subscription costs.
Matomo is a robust, compliant and cost-effective alternative to Google Optimize. Our tool allows you to schedule campaigns across all digital mediums (and even desktop apps !) without a
-
Matomo vs WP-Statistics – which web analytics plugin suits you best ?
2 avril 2020, par Joselyn Khor — Analytics Tips, PluginsDue to the endless choices, you may be wondering which web analytics plugin (GA, Slimstat or WP-Statistics) to choose from on the WordPress directory. If the choice is between WP-Statistics and Matomo for WordPress, we’ve got you covered. Have a look at which could be the best option for you. Our team tested the WP-Statistics plugin to see how it compares. It’s hard not to be biased, but we’ll try our best to give you a fair assessment.
The main considerations in this article :
General overview
What’s Matomo Analytics for WordPress ?
Matomo for WordPress is a free, privacy-friendly web analytics plugin that lets you understand website visitors and how they behave on your site. With comprehensive insights, you get the opportunity to increase conversions, and the know-how to improve your website.
It lets you undertake essential analysis by tracking information, such as, where visitors are coming from, what your most popular pages are, and how visitors are using your site.
In addition to the fundamentals, the tool also allows for advanced tracking and analysis with features that give you a full understanding of behavioural patterns and website performance. This enables you to optimise your WordPress website to increase sales or engagement.
It offers a complete analytics package with the bonuses of 100% data ownership, no data sampling, and GDPR compliance.
What’s WP-Statistics ?
WP-Statistics is currently the most used self-hosted WordPress statistics plugin. It provides reports that let you analyse who your visitors are, where they’re coming from, and to an extent what they’re doing on your website.
Like Matomo for WordPress, it gives you an understanding of your audience which helps you make decisions on how to improve your website for more conversions.
As it’s self-hosted on your own WordPress servers it can be seen as a privacy-friendly choice with a few tweaks (more on this below).
Like Matomo for WordPress, it gives you an understanding of your audience which helps you make decisions on how to improve your website for more conversions.
General comparison
Let’s compare the installation process and the dashboards that get installed in your WordPress.
Installation
Both Matomo and WP-Statistics are installed directly in your WordPress so you’ll be able to see your analytics reports right in your WordPress dashboard. You can install them both straight from the WordPress Directory.
The installation process for both plugins is beginner-friendly. You simply need to find them on the WordPress directory, click on ‘Install Now’, and tracking should start immediately in your WordPress dashboard.
Dashboard
For the main Matomo platform you’ll see :
- Visitors – Overview, Visits Log, Real-time, Real-time Map, Locations, Devices, Software, Times, User IDs, Custom Variables, User Type
- Behaviour – Pages, Entry Pages, Exit Pages, Page titles, Site Search, Outlinks, Downloads, Events, Contents, Engagement, Transitions, Users Flow, Top Paths, Page Author, Page Location, Page Type, Crawling errors
- Acquisition – Overview, All Channels, Search Engine & Keywords, Websites, Social Networks, Campaigns, Campaign URL Builder, Crawling overview
- Ecommerce – Overview, Ecommerce Log, Products, Sales, Multi Attribution
- Goals – Overview, Multi Attribution, Choose Goals, Manage Goals
- These may be worded differently from WP-Statistics, but they show you all the information you need to know about your traffic, pages, etc.
PreviousNextIn the dashboard for WP-Statistics you’ll see :
- Overview, Hits, Online, Referrers, Search Words, Search Engines, Pages, Visitors, Categories, Tags, Authors, Browsers, Top Visitors Today
- These are the only things you can see in the dashboard. So you can’t click into them for a drop down section to get deeper insights.
Key similarities between Matomo and WP-Statistics
- Free to use
- Self-hosted – All data collected is stored only within your own servers, no third parties have rights over your data, and logs or report data will never be sent to other servers.
- Beginner-friendly – Both offer simple reporting for people who are very much beginners and only want basic insights. With Matomo the advantage is also that you can get more details should you ever want/need to.
Key differences between Matomo and WP-Statistics
The main differences fall in these categories : features, privacy, documentation/support, security, active development, extensibility, price and ads.
Features :
WP-Statistics – On a fundamental level, WP-Statistics is focused on simplicity and the basics. There are fewer reports than Matomo and they function on a level that suits beginners who are interested in seeing only the numbers of visitors on the website, and how often each page is viewed.
Matomo – provides an interface with similar simplicity. However, there is also a more feature-rich and more comprehensive user interface available. In addition to the basics, Matomo offers features like Goals, Ecommerce, in the free version which show a deeper level of insight. WP Statistics does not let you track essentials like Goals or Ecommerce.
Privacy :
WP-Statistics – One of the concerns we wish to raise here is for data privacy. There doesn’t appear to be an opt-out option in WP-Statistics, which could be problematic for some privacy laws such as GDPR. There’s also no documentation on this.
We were a bit concerned to see that WP-Statistics didn’t have IP anonymization enabled by default. Considering the IP address is personal data, it means you are not compliant with privacy laws such as the GDPR when you use this plugin unless you tweak the settings. They mentioned : “In previous versions, there was an option called Hash IP. When Hash IP was activated, the IP addresses wouldn’t be stored in the database, but instead, a unique hash would be used. In this new version, an option has been added to store IPs anonymously. This option is active by default.” However, when we installed this and tested it on multiple WordPress installations, this option was not active by default.
Matomo – has more measures in place to ensure privacy is respected, such as, opt-outs. Due to the stringent privacy features in place, Matomo is well equipped to ensure GDPR compliance. Matomo has an abundance of user guides and FAQs you can follow to configure your platform to fully comply with GDPR. There’s even an 12-step compliant checklist. The most compelling proof is that the leading voice on GDPR – The European Commission uses Matomo Analytics.
Documentation/Support :
WP-Statistics – has little documentation, FAQs, and no support.
Matomo – has thousands of FAQs and user guides, as well as a dedicated support team and forum you can turn to for help. Should you ever run into any issue, this might be something important to consider.
The contrast in support between WP-Statistics and Matomo for WordPress :
WP-Statistics support Matomo Analytics support Security :
Matomo takes protecting your data very seriously. We have a security bounty programme giving security researchers money should they find any security issues. Matomo also performs a security review for every new release. We couldn’t find anything similar in WP-Statistics.
Active development :
WP Statistics – doesn’t seem to have active development. The last change in this plugin was over three months ago (source : https://github.com/wp-statistics/wp-statistics/commits/master) and in general, only 10 people really contributed to it (source : https://github.com/wp-statistics/wp-statistics/graphs/contributors, the graphs shows little contributor activity.)
Matomo – has been built by hundreds of contributors (source : https://github.com/matomo-org/matomo/graphs/contributors), and is actively maintained by multiple developers including developers who work on this full time. This means you can rest assured that Matomo will be there for you in the future, it will receive regular improvements.
Extensibility :
WP-Statistics – have a section on their website offering customisation but for a price.
Matomo – should you want any changes and have some developer knowledge or some developers at hand, you can completely customise and extend Matomo for free. There are also one hundred additional plugins available for Matomo for free.
Price :
The main WordPress plugins ‘WP Statistics‘ and ‘Matomo Analytics – Ethical Stats. Powerful Insights.‘ are both free.
WP Statistics and Matomo also sell paid add-ons. However, WP-Statistics’ paid add-ons are ones already integrated in Matomo for free. These basic features are provided as the development team believe they’re necessities to a fully functional analytics platform.
Ads :
WP Statistics shows you ads, whereas Matomo doesn’t.
Three most notable feature category comparisons
Both Matomo and WP-Statistics have basic tracking categories in the WP dashboard. In addition, Matomo has feature categories that can be expanded e.g. when clicked, Visitors drops down to reveal 11 more features.
We’ll compare three feature categories : Visitors, Behaviour, and Acquisitions.
1. Visitors (WP-Statistics) vs Visitors (Matomo)
Let’s dive into how each analytics platform provides insight into the visitors feature category.
WP-Statistics
WP-Statistics – We can see WP-Statistics gives you bare bones tracking capabilities so you don’t get a really detailed picture of your visitors. It allows you to monitor users currently online in real-time, which is useful to look at the most recent activity on your site. WP-Statistics doesn’t offer a dropdown section to see more about your visitor’s behavioural patterns. There is no Visitors category in WP-Statistics, just individual features in the dashboard but we can group three options together to compare with Matomo’s Visitors category, these are : Online, Browsers, Top Visitors Today.
Matomo
Comparison
Matomo – In comparison, Matomo has a Visitors category with a dropdown list that lets you drill deeper into what your visitors are doing. It lets you evaluate every action an individual user has taken on your website which is compiled into a full historical profile. Matomo gives an in-depth view. E.g. you can look at individual visit logs, locations, and devices.
This lets you see what the life-time journey of an active user looks like, or perhaps you want to see what a profile looks like for a user who comes back time-and-time again without ever purchasing ; there is no better way to gain insights to these journeys and this is why the Visitor Profiles feature is so widely used by Matomo users.
2. Pages tracking (WP-Statistics) vs Behaviour (Matomo)
For this comparison, WP-Statistics has a few features that can be combined to compare with Matomo’s Behaviour category.
WP-Statistics
The Pages section in WP-Statistics gives a basic look at your most popular pages so you know which pages get more visits and those which aren’t performing. This helps with content improvement. You can also see other features in this Behaviour category like Browsers and Hits – these also provide basic stats to help you get a general sense of visitor behaviour.
Matomo
Comparison :
Matomo on the other hand has stats that go into greater detail. The features under the Behaviour section of the tool let you draw actionable conclusions e.g. seeing that a page has a higher exit rate than it’s supposed to, so you optimise that page to prevent people leaving and help them progress through your website.
Not only can you see popular pages, you can look at : which page people viewed first when they visited your website ; which page they left from ; what people search for on your site ; and see how people are flowing through pages. Most importantly you can see how each of these reports perform over time so you can improve engagement and conversions on your website.
3. Referrers (WP-Statistics) vs Acquisition (Matomo)
For this comparison, WP-Statistics has a few features that can be combined to compare with Matomo’s Acquisition category.
WP-Statistics
WP-Statistics gives you Referrers, Search Words, and Search Engines. Which give a basic understanding of the channels that work best for you. This is helpful to know where to focus more of your attention.
Matomo
Comparison :
With Matomo you see multiple layers of stats to understand how your acquisition channels are performing. So you can see tables of data that drill into visits, downloads, bounce rate, and newsletter sign ups. For example seeing that Facebook is the channel bringing in the most visitors to your site. This gives you a better sense of which acquisition strategy is working for your site.
Who suits WP-Statistics
This is a great starter pack for people who want a lightweight, functional statistics plugin that gives you a basic overview of website hits and visitors. It’s very easy to use, so it’s great for beginners and those who want simple tracking. If you have basic goals for your website or blog’s success then WP-Statistics is enough for you to get numbers on visitors, page views, and hits, but won’t be suitable for a larger-scale business or organisation.
It’s suited for hobby websites, blogs, and freelancers who want simple, effective stats tracking, who don’t need detailed insights on site performance or tracking.
Who suits Matomo
Matomo can be used for the same basic reporting, but has the capability for you to go deeper into more advanced reporting in a different UI if you need it. It’s an option that can work for a wider range of users – from beginners to analysts. There are features to suit all skill levels. This complete suite of features makes it a more comprehensive tool, as you can get more out of it. Ideal not only for bloggers and beginners, but also powerful enough to suit businesses, privacy-respecting organisations, and those who would benefit from conversion optimisation features.
You can draw insights from all stages of the customer journey – you’ll track behavioural patterns as soon as visitors enter your site, to their progression through your site, and ultimately to conversion and exit. It’s also an ethical choice because you get 100% data ownership.
If you’d like to look deeper into your data then Matomo would also be suitable for you. Matomo’s UI is lean, very easy to learn and shouldn’t overwhelm users in the way another tool like Google Analytics might do. If you think Matomo suits you best, you can install it for free now.
Advantages of using Matomo
Truly privacy-respecting
There’s no messing about when it comes to privacy. As a lot of users are based in Europe, Matomo adheres to the strictest privacy laws and can be counted on as a privacy-respecting tool that’s used by many government entities. Needing to comply with major privacy laws (GDPR) in Europe means Matomo can proudly ensure users are making the ethical choice.
GDPR compliance
You mitigate the risks of getting caught out and fined for breaching GDPR regulations. There’s a complete list of documentation, guides, information, and tools to make sure you’re on the right side of GDPR.
All-rounder
Matomo gives you a clearer picture of your visitors which helps you make better decisions for your website overall. The support and documentation is thorough which means you get more out of your Matomo experience.
Conclusion
Both tools will do you justice in terms of fundamental reporting, but Matomo Analytics will outshine if you want a greater understanding of your website and want to carry out deeper levels of analysis.
You can draw useful insights with WP-Statistics so it has to be said that they are doing something right with an entry-level offering. The simplicity is great, but you won’t really get more than a basic idea of how your site is performing.
On the flipside, this simplicity could also be a double-edged sword for WP-Statistics in that it’s too simplistic to draw actionable insights. If you’re wanting to know anything that could increase sales, conversions or subscribers – then you wouldn’t really get the reports to do so.
WP-Statistics also falls short when it comes to updates and support. So a major difference can be seen in support, active development, ads, security, documentation, which many people may think about until they’re in trouble and find they need these resources. Matomo offers support, continuous product development, and extensive documentation. There are also no ads, making it more enjoyable to use.
One thing we’d like to raise awareness about is WP-Statistics’ claims of being privacy-respecting without much documentation to back up those claims. There is a lack of privacy features which could put some website owners at risk of non-compliance. Just be sure to check that you’ve carried out the steps to comply with the privacy laws in your country.
Matomo makes it clear that privacy is essential as is compliance to privacy laws like GDPR. The strength also lies in the peace of mind you get from a tool that’s used by global privacy leaders such as the European Commission.