Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/configuration

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (78)

  • Websites made ​​with MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    This page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.

  • L’agrémenter visuellement

    10 avril 2011

    MediaSPIP est basé sur un système de thèmes et de squelettes. Les squelettes définissent le placement des informations dans la page, définissant un usage spécifique de la plateforme, et les thèmes l’habillage graphique général.
    Chacun peut proposer un nouveau thème graphique ou un squelette et le mettre à disposition de la communauté.

  • Le profil des utilisateurs

    12 avril 2011, par

    Chaque utilisateur dispose d’une page de profil lui permettant de modifier ses informations personnelle. Dans le menu de haut de page par défaut, un élément de menu est automatiquement créé à l’initialisation de MediaSPIP, visible uniquement si le visiteur est identifié sur le site.
    L’utilisateur a accès à la modification de profil depuis sa page auteur, un lien dans la navigation "Modifier votre profil" est (...)

Sur d’autres sites (6813)

  • Révision 17269 : attention : statut est un tableau dont chaque element est un tableau decrivant l...

    18 février 2011, par cedric -

    + utiliser la description venant de $boucle->show lors de la compilation

  • ffmpegthumbnailer issue : dyld : Library not loaded : /usr/local/lib/libavutil.52.18.100.dylib

    18 octobre 2013, par scientiffic

    When I try to run ffmpegthumbnailer, I get the following error :

    dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libavutil.52.18.100.dylib
     Referenced from: /usr/local/bin/ffmpegthumbnailer
     Reason: image not found
     Trace/BPT trap: 5

    I installed ffmpeg using the directions here :

    http://ffmpeg.org/trac/ffmpeg/wiki/MacOSXCompilationGuide

    In my /usr/local/lib folder, I have the file "libavutil.a", but not the one specified in the error mesage.

    How can I solve this error ?

    This is what I was using to try to generate a thumbnail :

    ffmpegthumbnailer -i /public/uploads/tmp/1382121359-37490-7826/thumb_Untitled.mov -o /public/uploads/tmp/1382121359-37490-7826/tmpfile.png -c png -q 10 -s 158
  • Making Sure The PNG Gets There

    14 juin 2013, par Multimedia Mike — General

    Rewind to 1999. I was developing an HTTP-based remote management interface for an embedded device. The device sat on an ethernet LAN and you could point a web browser at it. The pitch was to transmit an image of the device’s touch screen and the user could click on the picture to interact with the device. So we needed an image format. If you were computing at the time, you know that the web was insufferably limited back then. Our choice basically came down to GIF and JPEG. Being the office’s annoying free software zealot, I was championing a little known up and coming format named PNG.

    So the challenge was to create our own PNG encoder (incorporating a library like libpng wasn’t an option for this platform). I seem to remember being annoyed at having to implement an integrity check (CRC) for the PNG encoder. It’s part of the PNG spec, after all. It just seemed so redundant. At the time, I reasoned that there were 5 layers of integrity validation in play.

    I don’t know why, but I was reflecting on this episode recently and decided to revisit it. Here are all the encapsulation layers of a PNG file when flung over an ethernet network :


    PNG Network Encapsulation

    So there are up to 5 encapsulations for the data in this situation. At the innermost level is the image data which is compressed with the zlib DEFLATE method. At first, I thought that this also had a CRC or checksum. However, in researching this post, I couldn’t find any evidence of such an integrity check. Further, I don’t think we bothered to compress the PNG data in this project long ago. It was a small image, monochrome, and transferring via LAN, so the encoder could get away with signaling uncompressed data.

    The graphical data gets wrapped up in a PNG chunk and all PNG chunks have a CRC. To transmit via the network, it goes into a TCP frame, which also has a checksum. That goes into an IP packet. I previously believed that this represented another integrity check. While an IP frame does have a checksum, the checksum only covers the IP header and not the payload. So that doesn’t really count towards this goal.

    Finally, the data gets encapsulated into an ethernet frame which has — you guessed it — a CRC.

    I see that other link layer protocols like PPP and wireless ethernet (802.11) also feature frame CRCs. So I guess what I’m saying is that, if you transfer a PNG file over the network, you can be confident that the data will be free of any errors.