
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (26)
-
La file d’attente de SPIPmotion
28 novembre 2010, parUne file d’attente stockée dans la base de donnée
Lors de son installation, SPIPmotion crée une nouvelle table dans la base de donnée intitulée spip_spipmotion_attentes.
Cette nouvelle table est constituée des champs suivants : id_spipmotion_attente, l’identifiant numérique unique de la tâche à traiter ; id_document, l’identifiant numérique du document original à encoder ; id_objet l’identifiant unique de l’objet auquel le document encodé devra être attaché automatiquement ; objet, le type d’objet auquel (...) -
Contribute to documentation
13 avril 2011Documentation is vital to the development of improved technical capabilities.
MediaSPIP welcomes documentation by users as well as developers - including : critique of existing features and functions articles contributed by developers, administrators, content producers and editors screenshots to illustrate the above translations of existing documentation into other languages
To contribute, register to the project users’ mailing (...) -
Récupération d’informations sur le site maître à l’installation d’une instance
26 novembre 2010, parUtilité
Sur le site principal, une instance de mutualisation est définie par plusieurs choses : Les données dans la table spip_mutus ; Son logo ; Son auteur principal (id_admin dans la table spip_mutus correspondant à un id_auteur de la table spip_auteurs)qui sera le seul à pouvoir créer définitivement l’instance de mutualisation ;
Il peut donc être tout à fait judicieux de vouloir récupérer certaines de ces informations afin de compléter l’installation d’une instance pour, par exemple : récupérer le (...)
Sur d’autres sites (3586)
-
What is the most performant way to render unmanaged video frames in WPF ?
18 avril 2017, par superwareI’m using FFmpeg library to receive and decode H.264/MPEG-TS over UDP with minimal latency (something MediaElement can’t handle).
On a dedicated FFmpeg thread, I’m pulling PixelFormats.Bgr32 video frames for display. I’ve already tried InteropBitmap :
_section = CreateFileMapping(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, IntPtr.Zero, PAGE_READWRITE, 0, size, null);
_buffer = MapViewOfFile(_section, FILE_MAP_ALL_ACCESS, 0, 0, size);
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_interopBitmap = (InteropBitmap)Imaging.CreateBitmapSourceFromMemorySection(_section, width, height, PixelFormats.Bgr32, (int)size / height, 0);
this.Source = _interopBitmap;
});And then per frame update :
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_interopBitmap.Invalidate();
});But performance is quite bad (skipping frames, high CPU usage etc).
I’ve also tried WriteableBitmap : FFmpeg is placing frames in _writeableBitmap.BackBuffer and per frame update :
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_writeableBitmap.Lock();
});
try
{
ret = FFmpegInvoke.sws_scale(...);
}
finally
{
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_writeableBitmap.AddDirtyRect(_rect);
_writeableBitmap.Unlock();
});
}Experiencing almost the same performance issues (tested with various DispatcherPriority).
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
-
What is the most performant way to render unmanaged video frames in WPF ?
27 mai 2017, par superwareI’m using FFmpeg library to receive and decode H.264/MPEG-TS over UDP with minimal latency (something MediaElement can’t handle).
On a dedicated FFmpeg thread, I’m pulling PixelFormats.Bgr32 video frames for display. I’ve already tried InteropBitmap :
_section = CreateFileMapping(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, IntPtr.Zero, PAGE_READWRITE, 0, size, null);
_buffer = MapViewOfFile(_section, FILE_MAP_ALL_ACCESS, 0, 0, size);
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_interopBitmap = (InteropBitmap)Imaging.CreateBitmapSourceFromMemorySection(_section, width, height, PixelFormats.Bgr32, (int)size / height, 0);
this.Source = _interopBitmap;
});And then per frame update :
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_interopBitmap.Invalidate();
});But performance is quite bad (skipping frames, high CPU usage etc).
I’ve also tried WriteableBitmap : FFmpeg is placing frames in _writeableBitmap.BackBuffer and per frame update :
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_writeableBitmap.Lock();
});
try
{
ret = FFmpegInvoke.sws_scale(...);
}
finally
{
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_writeableBitmap.AddDirtyRect(_rect);
_writeableBitmap.Unlock();
});
}Experiencing almost the same performance issues (tested with various DispatcherPriority).
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
-
Streaming a webcam to a web server to be streamed on web
19 octobre 2012, par gazzwi86I intend on streaming a web cam from a Raspberry Pi to a server, which can then serve the stream up to users over the web. I would ideally like the stream to work across all browsers with minimal complication, so the current mjpeg format I presume would not be ideal.
Firstly, I would like to know if ffmpeg is the right tool for the job as its what I'm experimenting with at the moment ? I also looked at using ffmpeg and motion but didnt see the need for motion as I don't need motion detection. My config for ffmpeg is listed below :
I installed via apt-get :
apt-get install ffmpeg
I have create a config file /etc/ffserver.conf containing the following :
Port 80
BindAddress 0.0.0.0
MaxClients 10
MaxBandwidth 50000
NoDaemon
<feed>
file /tmp/webcam.ffm
FileMaxSize 10M
</feed>
<stream>
Feed webcam.ffm
Format mpjpeg
VideoSize 640x480
VideoFrameRate 15
VideoBitRate 2000
VideoQMin 1
VideoQMax 10
strict -1
</stream>I have created a file in the sbin called webcam.sh containing the following :
ffserver -f /etc/ffserver.conf & ffmpeg -v verbose -r 5 -s 640x480 -f video4linux2 -i /dev/video0 http://localhost/webcam.ffm
Running the above starts the stream but at the moment viewing http://webcam.mjpeg starts a file downloading which seems not to start in chrome and doing the same with and html file with the stream in a img tag doesnt work.