
Recherche avancée
Médias (3)
-
Exemple de boutons d’action pour une collection collaborative
27 février 2013, par
Mis à jour : Mars 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
-
Exemple de boutons d’action pour une collection personnelle
27 février 2013, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Image
-
Collections - Formulaire de création rapide
19 février 2013, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
Autres articles (47)
-
Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins
27 avril 2010, parMediaspip core
autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs -
HTML5 audio and video support
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...) -
Support audio et vidéo HTML5
10 avril 2011MediaSPIP utilise les balises HTML5 video et audio pour la lecture de documents multimedia en profitant des dernières innovations du W3C supportées par les navigateurs modernes.
Pour les navigateurs plus anciens, le lecteur flash Flowplayer est utilisé.
Le lecteur HTML5 utilisé a été spécifiquement créé pour MediaSPIP : il est complètement modifiable graphiquement pour correspondre à un thème choisi.
Ces technologies permettent de distribuer vidéo et son à la fois sur des ordinateurs conventionnels (...)
Sur d’autres sites (9612)
-
Why don't VideoIntelligence end_time_offset values match for the same video ?
3 septembre 2022, par ProGirlXOXOWhen parsing the results of Google's Video Intelligence API, I've noticed that
speech_transcriptions
and all other annotation results are split into two separate list items withinannotation_results
. See the example output below.

Digging further, I've noticed they have slightly varied
end_time_offset
values.

- 

- Why are these
end_time_offset
values different ? I expect them both to show the exact same value since the exact same video is being analyzed for both sets of features. In some cases this value is off by more than a second. - Assuming this is not an error, which
end_time_offset
I trust if I want to determine the total duration of the video ? - Why is feature output split into two different list items ?








{
 "annotation_results": [
 {
 "input_uri": "<redacted>.mp4",
 "segment": {
 "start_time_offset": {},
 "end_time_offset": {
 "seconds": 57,
 "nanos": 849516000
 }
 },
 "shot_label_annotations": [],
 "shot_annotations": [],
 "explicit_annotation": {},
 "text_annotations": [],
 "logo_recognition_annotations": []
 },
 {
 "input_uri": "<redacted>.mp4",
 "segment": {
 "start_time_offset": {},
 "end_time_offset": {
 "seconds": 58,
 "nanos": 69333000
 }
 },
 "speech_transcriptions": []
 }
 ]
}
</redacted></redacted>


- Why are these
-
fftools/cmdutils : extend stream specifiers to match by disposition
15 septembre 2024, par Anton Khirnov -
How to process video stream ?
27 avril 2016, par sharpenerI would like to ask some experienced multimedia professional how to proceed with following task :
Given URL provides video stream and we would like to get access to decoded frames (byte stream in memory) in managed
Win7+
application (C#
). We don’t want to render/present the frames the standard way. The video format is known but not fixed (might get changed between two successive sessions, but we will know the parameters).So far, I have found there are several methods and I have build following picture in my mind :
ffmpeg
wrapper- Pros
- Self contained (no dependency to windows technologies)
- Powerful
- Cons
- Little more complex to understand
- Lot of different wrapping variants (
FFmpeg.NET
,ffmpeg-sharp
,ffmpeg-shard
,FFmpeg.AutoGen
, ...)
- Pros
DirectShow
wrapper- Pros
- Widely used/supported technology (variaous filters freely available)
- Nice/detailed documentation on
MSDN
- Cons
- Quite old
- Considered obsolete from the point of author’s view (available only for
desktop
model on runtime >= Win8)
- Pros
MediaFoundation
wrapper- Pros
- Theoretical successor of
DirectShow
, so should be available in the future
- Theoretical successor of
- Cons
- Seems to be not as good as
DirectShow
- Not very popular, limited "community" support
- Seems to be not as good as
- Pros
FFmpegInterop
wrapper- Pros
- Microsoft’s open source wrapper alternative
- Cons
- Not available for runtime < Win8
- Pros