
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (28)
-
Support de tous types de médias
10 avril 2011Contrairement à beaucoup de logiciels et autres plate-formes modernes de partage de documents, MediaSPIP a l’ambition de gérer un maximum de formats de documents différents qu’ils soient de type : images (png, gif, jpg, bmp et autres...) ; audio (MP3, Ogg, Wav et autres...) ; vidéo (Avi, MP4, Ogv, mpg, mov, wmv et autres...) ; contenu textuel, code ou autres (open office, microsoft office (tableur, présentation), web (html, css), LaTeX, Google Earth) (...)
-
HTML5 audio and video support
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...) -
Support audio et vidéo HTML5
10 avril 2011MediaSPIP utilise les balises HTML5 video et audio pour la lecture de documents multimedia en profitant des dernières innovations du W3C supportées par les navigateurs modernes.
Pour les navigateurs plus anciens, le lecteur flash Flowplayer est utilisé.
Le lecteur HTML5 utilisé a été spécifiquement créé pour MediaSPIP : il est complètement modifiable graphiquement pour correspondre à un thème choisi.
Ces technologies permettent de distribuer vidéo et son à la fois sur des ordinateurs conventionnels (...)
Sur d’autres sites (3110)
-
iOS convert video with FFMPEG programitically(no use ffmpeg command)
22 novembre 2012, par user1239775I am going to convert video captured from camera to mpeg format using FFMPEG for reducing the size of video file.
I converted the video to mpeg with 'CODEC_ID_MPEG1VIDEO. But the audio was not played.
I didn't find the reason.
My video format is h264 & aac.Please help me.
Thanks in advance. -
EC2 for video-encoding
24 septembre 2012, par TK KocheranI have a potential job which will require me to do some video encoding with FFMPEG and x264. I'll have a series of files which I'll need to encode once, then I'll be able to bring down the instances. Since I'm not really sure of the resource utilization of x264 and FFMPEG, what kind of instances should I get ? I'm thinking either a
High-CPU Extra Large Instance
7 GB of memory
20 EC2 Compute Units (8 virtual cores with 2.5 EC2 Compute Units each)
1690 GB of instance storage
64-bit platform
I/O Performance : High
API name : c1.xlargeor, alternatively a
Cluster GPU Quadruple Extra Large Instance
22 GB of memory
33.5 EC2 Compute Units (2 x Intel Xeon X5570, quad-core “Nehalem” architecture)
2 x NVIDIA Tesla “Fermi” M2050 GPUs
1690 GB of instance storage
64-bit platform
I/O Performance : Very High (10 Gigabit Ethernet)
API name : cg1.4xlargeWhat should I use ? Does x264/FFMPEG perform better with faster/more CPUs or does it really pound the GPU more ? In any case, it seems that the Cluster GPU seems to be the higher performance instance. What should I prefer ?
-
EC2 for video-encoding
24 septembre 2012, par TK KocheranI have a potential job which will require me to do some video encoding with FFMPEG and x264. I'll have a series of files which I'll need to encode once, then I'll be able to bring down the instances. Since I'm not really sure of the resource utilization of x264 and FFMPEG, what kind of instances should I get ? I'm thinking either a
High-CPU Extra Large Instance
7 GB of memory
20 EC2 Compute Units (8 virtual cores with 2.5 EC2 Compute Units each)
1690 GB of instance storage
64-bit platform
I/O Performance : High
API name : c1.xlargeor, alternatively a
Cluster GPU Quadruple Extra Large Instance
22 GB of memory
33.5 EC2 Compute Units (2 x Intel Xeon X5570, quad-core “Nehalem” architecture)
2 x NVIDIA Tesla “Fermi” M2050 GPUs
1690 GB of instance storage
64-bit platform
I/O Performance : Very High (10 Gigabit Ethernet)
API name : cg1.4xlargeWhat should I use ? Does x264/FFMPEG perform better with faster/more CPUs or does it really pound the GPU more ? In any case, it seems that the Cluster GPU seems to be the higher performance instance. What should I prefer ?