Recherche avancée

Médias (2)

Mot : - Tags -/doc2img

Autres articles (34)

  • ANNEXE : Les plugins utilisés spécifiquement pour la ferme

    5 mars 2010, par

    Le site central/maître de la ferme a besoin d’utiliser plusieurs plugins supplémentaires vis à vis des canaux pour son bon fonctionnement. le plugin Gestion de la mutualisation ; le plugin inscription3 pour gérer les inscriptions et les demandes de création d’instance de mutualisation dès l’inscription des utilisateurs ; le plugin verifier qui fournit une API de vérification des champs (utilisé par inscription3) ; le plugin champs extras v2 nécessité par inscription3 (...)

  • Encoding and processing into web-friendly formats

    13 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP automatically converts uploaded files to internet-compatible formats.
    Video files are encoded in MP4, Ogv and WebM (supported by HTML5) and MP4 (supported by Flash).
    Audio files are encoded in MP3 and Ogg (supported by HTML5) and MP3 (supported by Flash).
    Where possible, text is analyzed in order to retrieve the data needed for search engine detection, and then exported as a series of image files.
    All uploaded files are stored online in their original format, so you can (...)

  • MediaSPIP v0.2

    21 juin 2013, par

    MediaSPIP 0.2 is the first MediaSPIP stable release.
    Its official release date is June 21, 2013 and is announced here.
    The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
    To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
    If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...)

Sur d’autres sites (5711)

  • win_utf8_io.c : Remove redundant line.

    9 août 2014, par Erik de Castro Lopo
    win_utf8_io.c : Remove redundant line.

    Patch-from : lvqcl <lvqcl.mail@gmail.com>
    • [DH] src/share/win_utf8_io/win_utf8_io.c

  • Thread count option in FFmpeg for FASTEST conversion to h264 ?

    5 septembre 2013, par Saptarshi Biswas

    I need to maximize speed while converting videos using FFmpeg to h264

    • Any input format of source videos
    • User's machine can have any number of cores
    • Power and memory consumption are non-issues

    Of course, there are a whole bunch of options that can be tweaked but this question is particularly about choosing the best -thread <count></count> option. I am trying to find an ideal thread count as a function of

    • no. of cores
    • input video format
    • h264-friendly values maybe ?
    • anything else missed above ?

    I am aware the default -thread 0 follows one-thread-per-core approach which is supposed to be optimal. But I am not sure if this is time or space-optimized. Also, on certain testcases, I've seen more threads (say 4 threads on my dual core test machine) finishes quicker than the default.

    Any other direction, say configure options w.r.t. threads, worth pursuing ?

  • Thread count option in FFmpeg for FASTEST conversion to h264 ?

    9 février, par S B

    I need to maximize speed while converting videos using FFmpeg to h264

    &#xA;&#xA;

      &#xA;
    • Any input format of source videos

      • &#xA;

    • User's machine can have any number of cores

      • &#xA;

    • Power and memory consumption are non-issues

      • &#xA;

    &#xA;&#xA;

    Of course, there are a whole bunch of options that can be tweaked but this question is particularly about choosing the best -thread <count></count> option. I am trying to find an ideal thread count as a function of

    &#xA;&#xA;

      &#xA;
    • no. of cores

      • &#xA;

    • input video format

      • &#xA;

    • h264-friendly values maybe ?

      • &#xA;

    • anything else missed above ?

      • &#xA;

    &#xA;&#xA;

    I am aware the default -thread 0 follows one-thread-per-core approach which is supposed to be optimal. But I am not sure if this is time or space-optimized. Also, on certain testcases, I've seen more threads (say 4 threads on my dual core test machine) finishes quicker than the default.

    &#xA;&#xA;

    Any other direction, say configure options w.r.t. threads, worth pursuing ?

    &#xA;

Navigation