Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (10080)

• ffmpeg : How does one designate what parts of an overlay video stream let the underlay video stream show through ?

  21 février 2023, par Walt Howard

  Stream 0 is a rotating planet created using povray. (https://www.povray.org/)

  


  Stream 1 is just a static jpeg of stars.

  


  I'm using overlay like this :

  


  nice ffmpeg -i protoplanet.mp4 -i stars.jpg \
         -filter_complex "[0:v]scale=1024:768[scaled];[1:v][scaled]overlay=0:0" \
         -movflags faststart -pix_fmt yuv420p -r 10 planet.mp4


  


  I had it working when I used the output from povray directly. I didn't have to know why that worked, because it just did. However, after adding some post processing to the planet video, the entire video has no alpha channel (educated guess) so the background stream (Stream 1) cannot show through.

  


  The post processing I did was this (which works great) : https://www.reddit.com/r/ffmpeg/comments/im2mkp/creating_a_retro_glow_effect_with_ffmpeg/

  


  But that made the video unable to have an overlay background possibly due to it destroying the alpha channel and turning many of the blacks to dark grey.

  


  I can merge the pure POVRAY output and the background and then add the glow effect, but it adds the effect to the background stars and captions also which ruins the effect to some degree. I want to glo-ify the planet first, then stick it on a pure starfield background.

  


  In thinking this over I may have to recreate the alpha channel after adding the glow effect, using a nearest match to black and dark grey to alpha.

  


  Hmmm. It might be a codec issue as I didn't specify any -c:v in any of my commands....

  


• Electron, Chromium and ffmpeg licencing confusion, how to build electron with licence compatible ffmpeg [migrated]

  12 mars 2021, par Iamisti

  Intro :
Recently I'm working on an electron based application that is free to use but also has subscription based services.
It came to my attention that ffmpeg is shipped with electron, which has GPL/LGPL licence.

  


  My quetion is :

  


  

  • Am I legally able to still distribute the application and be licence-compliant with ffmpeg without owning any proper licence to it ? I thought chromium dealt with the licencing on this topic since so many applications nowadays are shipped with using electron and chromium under the hood.

  


  • How do I compile/build electron to make it licence compatible (in case its not ?)

  


  


  I did a lot of reseearch and I found out the followings :

  


  


  • ffmpeg is shipped with chromium, they built their own version of ffmpeg and it seems they also have licence for it. Although that might be that they just push the responsibility down on the software developer/company who distributes their application with chromium.
Chromium licence for ffmpeg : https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/third_party/ffmpeg/+/703e920bb75053bf6b87d41d198cbbfbce3fb7ad/LICENSE

    


  


  • Apparently ffmpeg has a checklist of how to be licence compliant. Does that mean if I do all these steps, I can still distribute the application and can legally use it ? Licence checklist for ffmpeg : http://ffmpeg.org/legal.html

    


  


  • checking out some popular electron applications like Discord, Figma, Slack, etc... they ALL have ffmpeg included cause of electron when you install them. I wonder how they made it legal ? I don't see any of these checklists done on any of these popular applications.

    


  


  


  I'm know very little regarding licences, so any help would be incredibly huge help for me.

  


• Anomalie #3746 (En cours) : spip_release_lock => pb mysqli_query

  30 mars 2016, par b b

  C’est certainement parce que cette fonction est dépréciée, cf :

  https://core.spip.net/projects/spip/repository/entry/spip/ecrire/req/mysql.php#L1691

  D’ailleurs, elle n’est utilisée nul part dans le core, mais ça ne mange pas de pain de la corriger. Attendons d’autres avis avant d’intégrer le patch...