
Recherche avancée
Médias (91)
-
999,999
26 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
The Slip - Artworks
26 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Texte
-
Demon seed (wav version)
26 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
The four of us are dying (wav version)
26 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Corona radiata (wav version)
26 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Lights in the sky (wav version)
26 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
Autres articles (43)
-
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir -
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...) -
MediaSPIP v0.2
21 juin 2013, parMediaSPIP 0.2 is the first MediaSPIP stable release.
Its official release date is June 21, 2013 and is announced here.
The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...)
Sur d’autres sites (4947)
-
What's the difference with crf and qp in ffmpeg ?
18 novembre 2016, par NovaAfter browsing around Google, I’ve came across this page about h264 encoding and discovered about qp. https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.264
My questions are : What are the differences with crf and qp ? Is it better to use qp over crf overall, or is it only if for using qp 0 for best lossless ? Does qp have a known sensible setting if it’s preferred ? So far, I know crf has the default value of 23 while 18 is a sensible preferred increase in quality, although I don’t understand why 18 wouldn’t be default if better sensible lossless. Lastly, would changing either of them cause incompatibility with non-ffmpeg players or just qp ?
I’m converting from webm to mp4 by the way.
I was going to test crf 23 and 18 and pick which is best but I can’t seem to find any concrete information on this comparison or about qp.
-
avformat/movenc : Check first DTS similar to dts difference
9 septembre 2016, par Michael Niedermayeravformat/movenc : Check first DTS similar to dts difference
Fixes assertion failure
Fixes : b84b53855a0b74560e64c6f45f505a13/signal_sigabrt_7ffff6ae7c37_3837_ef4e243ea5b4fa8d0becf4afe9166604.aviFound-by : Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
Signed-off-by : Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> -
Difference between ffmpeg and avconv for rawvideo image2pipe
15 août 2016, par NHDalyI’m not sure why, but
avconv
does not seem to be piping raw video like I would expect.I’m trying pipe a video from
ffmpeg
intopython
(eventually I want to read fromx11grab
, not a video file). It works just fine on my Macbook usingffmpeg
, but when I useavconv
on Debian Jessie, the stream cuts off early !Here’s my basic python, which is following this guide :
input_resolution_shape = (1280,800,3)
input_bytes = reduce(mul, input_resolution_shape, 1)
print input_bytes
# Prints 3072000
import subprocess as sp
command = [ FFMPEG_BIN, # This is either "avconv" or "ffmpeg".
'-i', 'test_video.mp4',
'-f', 'image2pipe',
'-pix_fmt', 'rgb24',
'-vcodec', 'rawvideo', '-']
pipe = sp.Popen(command, stdout = sp.PIPE, bufsize=10**8)
import numpy
for _ in range(100): # read 100 frames
# read 1280*800*3 bytes (= 1 frame)
raw_image = pipe.stdout.read(input_bytes)
# transform the byte read into a numpy array
image = numpy.fromstring(raw_image, dtype='uint8')
if image.size != 0:
print image.size
# Prints 1015808On the mac, the
image.size
printed is the same as theinput_bytes
, 3072000. But on debian, it’s 1015808. Any ideas why that could be happening ?Interestingly, 3072000/1015808 is just about 3 :
In [1]: 3072000./1015808.
Out[1]: 3.024193548387097