Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/diogene

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (35)

  • Use, discuss, criticize

    13 avril 2011, par

    Talk to people directly involved in MediaSPIP’s development, or to people around you who could use MediaSPIP to share, enhance or develop their creative projects.
    The bigger the community, the more MediaSPIP’s potential will be explored and the faster the software will evolve.
    A discussion list is available for all exchanges between users.

  • MediaSPIP Player : les contrôles

    26 mai 2010, par

    Les contrôles à la souris du lecteur
    En plus des actions au click sur les boutons visibles de l’interface du lecteur, il est également possible d’effectuer d’autres actions grâce à la souris : Click : en cliquant sur la vidéo ou sur le logo du son, celui ci se mettra en lecture ou en pause en fonction de son état actuel ; Molette (roulement) : en plaçant la souris sur l’espace utilisé par le média (hover), la molette de la souris n’exerce plus l’effet habituel de scroll de la page, mais diminue ou (...)

  • MediaSPIP v0.2

    21 juin 2013, par

    MediaSPIP 0.2 is the first MediaSPIP stable release.
    Its official release date is June 21, 2013 and is announced here.
    The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
    To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
    If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...)

Sur d’autres sites (7603)

  • Révision 20289 : Report de r20230 : genie/mail utilise notifications_envoyer_mails() plutot que d...

    12 mars 2013, par cedric -

    asynchrone

    detecte et gere automatiquement les mails HTML Seul impact : l’envoi de headers spécifiques doit se faire via #HTTP_HEADER dans le squelette du mail, et pas texte brut entre le sujet et le corps du mail. Ne concerne que d’éventuels mails de nouveautés personalisés avec des headers (...)

  • Bump version to 3.1.7 and update my info in a few places.

    14 décembre 2013, par brandonaaron
    Bump version to 3.1.7 and update my info in a few places.

  • Cloaked Archive Wiki

    16 mai 2011, par Multimedia Mike — General

    Google’s Chrome browser has made me phenomenally lazy. I don’t even attempt to type proper, complete URLs into the address bar anymore. I just type something vaguely related to the address and let the search engine take over. I saw something weird when I used this method to visit Archive Team’s site :



    There’s greater detail when you elect to view more results from the site :



    As the administrator of a MediaWiki installation like the one that archiveteam.org runs on, I was a little worried that they might have a spam problem. However, clicking through to any of those out-of-place pages does not indicate anything related to pharmaceuticals. Viewing source also reveals nothing amiss.

    I quickly deduced that this is a textbook example of website cloaking. This is when a website reports different content to a search engine than it reports to normal web browsers (humans, presumably). General pseudocode :

    PLAIN TEXT
    C :
    1. if (web_request.user_agent_string == CRAWLER_USER_AGENT)
    2.  return cloaked_data ;
    3. else
    4.  return real_data ;

    You can verify this for yourself using the wget command line utility :

    <br />
    $ wget --quiet --user-agent="<strong>Mozilla/5.0</strong>" \<br />
     http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Geocities -O - | grep \&lt;title\&gt;<br />
    &lt;title&gt;GeoCities - Archiveteam&lt;/title&gt;

    $ wget —quiet —user-agent="Googlebot/2.1"
    http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Geocities -O - | grep \<title\>
    <title>Cheap xanax | Online Drug Store, Big Discounts</title>

    I guess the little web prank worked because the phaux-pharma stuff got indexed. It makes we wonder if there’s a MediaWiki plugin that does this automatically.

    For extra fun, here’s a site called the CloakingDetector which purports to be able to detect whether a page employs cloaking. This is just one humble observer’s opinion, but I don’t think the site works too well :



Navigation