Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (6992)

• Fix SWF position and size calculations in IE 9.

  12 juillet 2013, par DelvarWorld

  Fix SWF position and size calculations in IE<9.
  Fixes #190.
  
  Closes #191.
  In oldIE, using the `typeof` operator on native DOM methods like `getBoundingClientRect` actually returns "object" instead of "function".
  
  Also, `getBoundingClientRect` did not add the "height" and "width" properties to TextRectangles until IE9, so calculate those manually if need be.
  Bumped version to v1.2.0-beta.3.
  

• Fix SWF position and size calculations in IE 9.

  12 juillet 2013, par DelvarWorld

  Fix SWF position and size calculations in IE<9.
  Fixes #190.
  
  Closes #191.
  In oldIE, using the `typeof` operator on native DOM methods like `getBoundingClientRect` actually returns "object" instead of "function".
  
  Also, `getBoundingClientRect` did not add the "height" and "width" properties to TextRectangles until IE9, so calculate those manually if need be.
  Bumped version to v1.2.0-beta.3.
  

• Decoder return of av_find_best_stream vs. avcodec_find_decoder

  7 octobre 2016, par Jason C

  The docs for libav’s av_find_best_stream function (libav 11.7, Windows, i686, GPL) specify a parameter that can be used to receive a pointer to an appropriate AVCodec :

  decoder_ret - if non-NULL, returns the decoder for the selected stream

  There is also the avcodec_find_decoder function which can find an AVCodec given an ID.

  However, the official demuxing + decoding example uses av_find_best_stream to find a stream, but chooses to use avcodec_find_decoder to find the codec in lieu of av_find_best_stream’s codec return parameter :

  ret = av_find_best_stream(fmt_ctx, type, -1, -1, NULL, 0);
  
  ...
  
  stream_index = ret;
  
  st = fmt_ctx->streams[stream_index];
  
  ...
  
  /* find decoder for the stream */
  
  dec = avcodec_find_decoder(st->codecpar->codec_id);

  As opposed to something like :

  ret = av_find_best_stream(fmt_ctx, type, -1, -1, &dec, 0);

  My question is pretty straightforward : Is there a difference between using av_find_best_stream’s return parameter vs. using avcodec_find_decoder to find the AVCodec ?

  The reason I ask is because the example chose to use avcodec_find_decoder rather than the seemingly more convenient return parameter, and I can’t tell if the example did that for a specific reason or not. The documentation itself is a little spotty and disjoint, so it’s hard to tell if things like this are done for a specific important reason or not. I can’t tell if the example is implying that it "should" be done that way, or if the example author did it for some more arbitrary personal reason.