Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (8300)

• Is there an efficient way to use ffmpeg to perform a large quantity of cuts from a single file ?

  16 mars 2024, par Giuliano Oliveri

  I'm trying to cut video files into smaller chunks. (each one being one word said in the video, so they're not all of equal size)

  


  I've tried a lot of different approaches to try to be as efficient as possible, but I can't get the runtime to be under 2/3rd of the original video length. That's an issue because I'm trying to process 400+ hours of video.

  


  Is there a more efficient way to do this ? Or am I doomed to run this for weeks ?

  


  Here is the command for my best attempt so far

  


  ffmpeg -hwaccel cuda -hwaccel_output_format cuda -ss start_timestamp -t to_timestamp -i file_name -vf "fps=30,scale_cuda=1280:720" -c:v h264_nvenc -y output_file


  


  Note that the machine running the code has a 4090
This command is then executed via python, which gives it the right timestamps and file paths for each smaller clip in a for loop

  


  I think it's wasting a lot of time calling a new process each time, however I haven't been able to get better results with a split filter ; but here's the ffmpeg-python code for that attempt :

  


  Creation of the stream :

  


  inp = (
    ffmpeg
    .input(file_name, hwaccel="cuda", hwaccel_output_format="cuda")
    .filter("fps",fps=30)
    .filter('scale_cuda', '1280','720')
    .filter_multi_output('split')
)


  


  Which then gets called in a for loop

  


  (
    ffmpeg
    .filter(inp, 'trim', start=row[1]['start'], end=row[1]['end'])
    .filter('setpts', 'PTS-STARTPTS')
    .output(output_file,vcodec='h264_nvenc')
    .run()
)


  


• Is there an efficient way to use ffmpeg to create a huge quantity of small video file, cut from a larger one ?

  9 mars 2024, par Giuliano Oliveri

  I'm trying to cut video files into smaller chunks. (each one being one word said in the video, so they're not all of equal size)

  


  I've tried a lot of different approaches to try to be as efficient as possible, but I can't get the runtime to be under 2/3rd of the original video length. That's an issue because I'm trying to process 400+ hours of video.

  


  Is there a more efficient way to do this ? Or am I doomed to run this for weeks ?

  


  Here is the command for my best attempt so far

  


  ffmpeg -hwaccel cuda -hwaccel_output_format cuda -ss start_timestamp -t to_timestamp -i file_name -vf "fps=30,scale_cuda=1280:720" -c:v h264_nvenc -y output_file


  


  Note that the machine running the code has a 4090
This command is then executed via python, which gives it the right timestamps and file paths for each smaller clip in a for loop

  


  I think it's wasting a lot of time calling a new process each time, however I haven't been able to get better results with a split filter ; but here's the ffmpeg-python code for that attempt :

  


  Creation of the stream :

  


  inp = (
    ffmpeg
    .input(file_name, hwaccel="cuda", hwaccel_output_format="cuda")
    .filter("fps",fps=30)
    .filter('scale_cuda', '1280','720')
    .filter_multi_output('split')
)


  


  Which then gets called in a for loop

  


  (
    ffmpeg
    .filter(inp, 'trim', start=row[1]['start'], end=row[1]['end'])
    .filter('setpts', 'PTS-STARTPTS')
    .output(output_file,vcodec='h264_nvenc')
    .run()
)


  


• swresample/resample : do not increase phase_count on exact_rational

  17 juin 2016, par Muhammad Faiz

  swresample/resample : do not increase phase_count on exact_rational
  high phase_count is only useful when dst_incr_mod is non zero
  
  in other word, it is only useful on soft compensation
  on init, it will build filter with low phase_count
  
  but when soft compensation is enabled, rebuild filter
  
  with high phase_count
  this approach saves lots of memory
  Reviewed-by : Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
  
  Signed-off-by : Muhammad Faiz <mfcc64@gmail.com>
  

  • [DH] libswresample/resample.c
  • [DH] libswresample/resample.h