Recherche avancée

Médias (1)

Mot : - Tags -/publier

Autres articles (85)

  • Websites made ​​with MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    This page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.

  • Creating farms of unique websites

    13 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
    This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)

  • Le profil des utilisateurs

    12 avril 2011, par

    Chaque utilisateur dispose d’une page de profil lui permettant de modifier ses informations personnelle. Dans le menu de haut de page par défaut, un élément de menu est automatiquement créé à l’initialisation de MediaSPIP, visible uniquement si le visiteur est identifié sur le site.
    L’utilisateur a accès à la modification de profil depuis sa page auteur, un lien dans la navigation "Modifier votre profil" est (...)

Sur d’autres sites (12304)

  • How to process video stream ?

    27 avril 2016, par sharpener

    I would like to ask some experienced multimedia professional how to proceed with following task :

    Given URL provides video stream and we would like to get access to decoded frames (byte stream in memory) in managed Win7+ application (C#). We don’t want to render/present the frames the standard way. The video format is known but not fixed (might get changed between two successive sessions, but we will know the parameters).

    So far, I have found there are several methods and I have build following picture in my mind :

    1. ffmpeg wrapper
      • Pros
        1. Self contained (no dependency to windows technologies)
        2. Powerful
      • Cons
        1. Little more complex to understand
        2. Lot of different wrapping variants (FFmpeg.NET, ffmpeg-sharp, ffmpeg-shard, FFmpeg.AutoGen, ...)
    2. DirectShow wrapper
      • Pros
        1. Widely used/supported technology (variaous filters freely available)
        2. Nice/detailed documentation on MSDN
      • Cons
        1. Quite old
        2. Considered obsolete from the point of author’s view (available only for desktop model on runtime >= Win8)
    3. MediaFoundation wrapper
      • Pros
        1. Theoretical successor of DirectShow, so should be available in the future
      • Cons
        1. Seems to be not as good as DirectShow
        2. Not very popular, limited "community" support
    4. FFmpegInterop wrapper
      • Pros
        1. Microsoft’s open source wrapper alternative
      • Cons
        1. Not available for runtime < Win8

  • Checkinstall equivalent on Red Hat (Santiago)

    29 octobre 2013, par Dalius

    I'm not familiar with Red Hat, never used it before.

    I'm installing ffmpeg from source, following this guide https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/CentosCompilationGuide

    On Debian, after using make to compile ffmpeg, I would use checkinstall to install ffmpeg for all users. How can I do the same on Red Hat ?

  • FFMPEG on Windows faststart command line with or without a +

    24 juillet 2014, par C0nw0nk

    So on the following wiki page i see ffmpeg tells us when using faststart for HTML5 compatibility we should use a + symbol.

    https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.264#faststartforwebvideo

    -movflags +faststart

    But looking at command line examples on here and other sites everyone puts it in their command line like this.

    ffmpeg -i C:\vidtests\Wildlife.mp4 -movflags faststart C:\vidtests\Wildlife_fs.mp4

    So my question is should it matter if the + symbol is there or not ?

Navigation