Recherche avancée

Médias (2)

Mot : - Tags -/media

Autres articles (84)

  • Amélioration de la version de base

    13 septembre 2013

    Jolie sélection multiple
    Le plugin Chosen permet d’améliorer l’ergonomie des champs de sélection multiple. Voir les deux images suivantes pour comparer.
    Il suffit pour cela d’activer le plugin Chosen (Configuration générale du site > Gestion des plugins), puis de configurer le plugin (Les squelettes > Chosen) en activant l’utilisation de Chosen dans le site public et en spécifiant les éléments de formulaires à améliorer, par exemple select[multiple] pour les listes à sélection multiple (...)

  • ANNEXE : Les plugins utilisés spécifiquement pour la ferme

    5 mars 2010, par

    Le site central/maître de la ferme a besoin d’utiliser plusieurs plugins supplémentaires vis à vis des canaux pour son bon fonctionnement. le plugin Gestion de la mutualisation ; le plugin inscription3 pour gérer les inscriptions et les demandes de création d’instance de mutualisation dès l’inscription des utilisateurs ; le plugin verifier qui fournit une API de vérification des champs (utilisé par inscription3) ; le plugin champs extras v2 nécessité par inscription3 (...)

  • Multilang : améliorer l’interface pour les blocs multilingues

    18 février 2011, par

    Multilang est un plugin supplémentaire qui n’est pas activé par défaut lors de l’initialisation de MediaSPIP.
    Après son activation, une préconfiguration est mise en place automatiquement par MediaSPIP init permettant à la nouvelle fonctionnalité d’être automatiquement opérationnelle. Il n’est donc pas obligatoire de passer par une étape de configuration pour cela.

Sur d’autres sites (4591)

  • Nexus One

    19 mars 2010, par Mans — Uncategorized

    I have had a Nexus One for about a week (thanks Google), and naturally I have an opinion or two about it.

    Hardware

    With the front side dominated by a touch-screen and a lone, round button, the Nexus One appearance is similar to that of most contemporary smartphones. The reverse sports a 5 megapixel camera with LED flash, a Google logo, and a smaller HTC logo. Power button, volume control, and headphone and micro-USB sockets are found along the edges. It is with appreciation I note the lack of a front-facing camera ; the silly idea of video calls is finally put to rest.

    Powering up the phone (I’m beginning to question the applicability of that word), I am immediately enamoured with the display. At 800×480 pixels, the AMOLED display is crystal-clear and easily viewable even in bright light. In a darker environment, the display automatically dims. The display does have one quirk in that the subpixel pattern doesn’t actually have a full RGB triplet for each pixel. The close-up photo below shows the pattern seen when displaying a solid white colour.

    Nexus One display close-up

    The result of this is that fine vertical lines, particularly red or blue ones, look a bit jagged. Most of the time this is not much of a problem, and I find it an acceptable compromise for the higher effective resolution it provides.

    Basic interaction

    The Android system is by now familiar, and the Nexus offers no surprises in basic usage. All the usual applications come pre-installed : browser, email, calendar, contacts, maps, and even voice calls. Many of the applications integrate with a Google account, which is nice. Calendar entries, map placemarks, etc. are automatically shared between desktop and mobile. Gone is the need for the bug-ridden custom synchronisation software with which mobile phones of the past were plagued.

    Launching applications is mostly speedy, and recently used apps are kept loaded as long as memory needs allow. Although this garbage-collection-style of application management, where you are never quite sure whether an app is still running, takes a few moments of acclimatisation, it works reasonably well in day to day use. Most of the applications are well-behaved and save their data before terminating.

    Email

    Two email applications are included out of the box : one generic and one Gmail-only. As I do not use Gmail, I cannot comment on this application. The generic email client supports IMAP, but is rather limited in functionality. Fortunately, a much-enhanced version, K-9, is available for download. The main feature I find lacking here is threaded message view.

    The features, or lack thereof, in the email applications is not, however, of huge importance, as composing email, or any longer piece of text, is something one rather avoids on a system like this. The on-screen keyboard, while falling among the better of its kind, is still slow to use. Lack of tactile feedback means accidentally tapping the wrong key is easily done, and entering numbers or punctuation is an outright chore.

    Browser

    Whatever the Nexus lacks in email abilities, it makes up for with the browser. Surfing the web on a phone has never been this pleasant. Page rendering is quick, and zooming is fast and simple. Even pages not designed for mobile viewing are easy to read with smart reformatting almost entirely eliminating the sideways scrolling which hampered many a mobile browser of old.

    Calls and messaging

    Being a phone, the Nexus One is obviously able to make and receive calls, and it does so with ease. Entering a number or locating a stored contact are both straight-forward operations. During a call, audio is clear and of adequate loudness, although I have yet to use the phone in really noisy surroundings.

    The other traditional task of a mobile phone, messaging, is also well-supported. There isn’t really much to say about this.

    Multimedia

    Having a bit of an interest in most things multimedia, I obviously tested the capabilities of the Nexus by throwing some assorted samples at it, revealing ample space for improvement. With video limited to H.264 and MPEG4, and the only supported audio codecs being AAC, MP3, Vorbis, and AMR, there are many files which will not play.

    To make matters worse, only selected combinations of audio and video will play together. Several video files I tested played without sound, yet when presented with the very same audio data alone, it was correctly decoded. As for container formats, it appears restricted to MP4/MOV, and Ogg (for Vorbis). AVI files are recognised as media files, but I was unable to find an AVI file which would play.

    With a device clearly capable of so much more, the poor multimedia support is nothing short of embarrassing.

    The Market

    Much of the hype surrounding Android revolves around the Market, Google’s virtual marketplace for app authors to sell or give away their creations. The thousands of available applications are broadly categorised, and a search function is available.

    The categorised lists are divided into free and paid sections, while search results, disappointingly, are not. To aid the decision, ratings and comments are displayed alongside the summary and screenshots of each application. Overall, the process of finding and installing an application is mostly painless. While it could certainly be improved, it could also have been much worse.

    The applications themselves are, as hinted above, beyond numerous. Sadly, quality does not quite match up to quantity. The vast majority of the apps are pointless, though occasionally mildly amusing, gimmicks of no practical value. The really good ones, and they do exist, are very hard to find unless one knows precisely what to look for.

    Battery

    Packing great performance into a pocket-size device comes with a price in battery life. The battery in the Nexus lasts considerably shorter time than that in my older, less feature-packed Nokia phone. To some extent this is probably a result of me actually using it a lot more, yet the end result is the same : more frequent recharging. I should probably get used to the idea of recharging the phone every other night.

    Verdict

    The Nexus One is a capable hardware platform running an OS with plenty of potential. The applications are still somewhat lacking (or very hard to find), although the basic features work reasonably well. Hopefully future Android updates will see more and better core applications integrated, and I imagine that over time, I will find third-party apps to solve my problems in a way I like. I am not putting this phone on the shelf just yet.

  • Playing 120fps in browser between original and re-made video, original is normal speed, new video is slo-mo

    1er mars 2023, par Patrick Vellia

    I used my GoPro Hero10 to record at 4k 120fps on a green screen. This original video plays slo-mo in QuickTime but "normal" speed in the browser. I want it playing normal speed, and if end user wants to slow it down they have the extra frames for that to maintain clarity, which is why I record at 120.

    


    I then used FFMPEG to create an image sequence of the video.

    


    Then I ran Image Magic to create the transparent frames.

    


    Then I put it back together with the following command for a HEVC mov file :

    


    ffmpeg -r 120 -f image2 -i transparent/image_transparent_%08d.png -vcodec hevc_videotoolbox -crf 28 -alpha_quality 1  -tag:v hvc1 output.mov


    


    I am still on an Intel MacBook Pro running FFMPEG 4.6 (as I've found 5+ was buggy with one of my commands a few months ago but can't remember which one, I think it was the videotoolbox).

    


    The GoPro video has the following stream data as input to the FFMPEG :

    


    Duration: 00:00:08.15, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 60160 kb/s
  Stream #0:0(eng): Video: hevc (Main) (hvc1 / 0x31637668), yuvj420p(pc, bt709), 3840x2160 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 59891 kb/s, 119.88 fps, 119.88 tbr, 120k tbn, 119.88 tbc (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2023-02-28T19:06:41.000000Z
      handler_name    : GoPro H.265
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
      encoder         : GoPro H.265 encoder
      timecode        : 19:05:32:105
  Stream #0:1(eng): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 189 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2023-02-28T19:06:41.000000Z
      handler_name    : GoPro AAC  
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
      timecode        : 19:05:32:105
  Stream #0:2(eng): Data: none (tmcd / 0x64636D74), 0 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2023-02-28T19:06:41.000000Z
      handler_name    : GoPro TCD  
      timecode        : 19:05:32:105
  Stream #0:3(eng): Data: bin_data (gpmd / 0x646D7067), 76 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2023-02-28T19:06:41.000000Z
      handler_name    : GoPro MET  


    


    Whereas the re-constructed video has the following data :

    


    Duration: 00:00:08.13, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 763650 kb/s
  Stream #0:0: Video: hevc (Main) (hvc1 / 0x31637668), yuv420p(tv, progressive), 3840x2160 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 763696 kb/s, 120 fps, 120 tbr, 15360 tbn, 15360 tbc (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : FFMP
      encoder         : Lavc58.134.100 hevc_videotoolbo


    


    When this re-constructed video plays in the browser, it is in slow-mo and I need to set the playbackRate to 4.0 for it to play "normally".

    


    Is there something I need to add to the video for the browser to play it at "normal" speed ?

    


  • how to get 120fps encoded video to play at "normal" speed instead of slow mo

    1er mars 2023, par Patrick Vellia

    I used my GoPro Hero10 to record at 4k 120fps on a green screen. This original video plays slo-mo in QuickTime but "normal" speed in the browser. I want it playing normal speed, and if end user wants to slow it down they have the extra frames for that to maintain clarity, which is why I record at 120.

    


    I then used FFMPEG to create an image sequence of the video.

    


    Then I ran Image Magic to create the transparent frames.

    


    Then I put it back together with the following command for a HEVC mov file :

    


    ffmpeg -r 120 -f image2 -i transparent/image_transparent_%08d.png -vcodec hevc_videotoolbox -crf 28 -alpha_quality 1  -tag:v hvc1 output.mov


    


    I am still on an Intel MacBook Pro running FFMPEG 4.6 (as I've found 5+ was buggy with one of my commands a few months ago but can't remember which one, I think it was the videotoolbox).

    


    The GoPro video has the following stream data as input to the FFMPEG :

    


    Duration: 00:00:08.15, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 60160 kb/s
  Stream #0:0(eng): Video: hevc (Main) (hvc1 / 0x31637668), yuvj420p(pc, bt709), 3840x2160 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 59891 kb/s, 119.88 fps, 119.88 tbr, 120k tbn, 119.88 tbc (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2023-02-28T19:06:41.000000Z
      handler_name    : GoPro H.265
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
      encoder         : GoPro H.265 encoder
      timecode        : 19:05:32:105
  Stream #0:1(eng): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 189 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2023-02-28T19:06:41.000000Z
      handler_name    : GoPro AAC  
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
      timecode        : 19:05:32:105
  Stream #0:2(eng): Data: none (tmcd / 0x64636D74), 0 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2023-02-28T19:06:41.000000Z
      handler_name    : GoPro TCD  
      timecode        : 19:05:32:105
  Stream #0:3(eng): Data: bin_data (gpmd / 0x646D7067), 76 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      creation_time   : 2023-02-28T19:06:41.000000Z
      handler_name    : GoPro MET  


    


    Whereas the re-constructed video has the following data :

    


    Duration: 00:00:08.13, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 763650 kb/s
  Stream #0:0: Video: hevc (Main) (hvc1 / 0x31637668), yuv420p(tv, progressive), 3840x2160 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 763696 kb/s, 120 fps, 120 tbr, 15360 tbn, 15360 tbc (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : FFMP
      encoder         : Lavc58.134.100 hevc_videotoolbo


    


    When this re-constructed video plays in the browser, it is in slow-mo and I need to set the playbackRate to 4.0 for it to play "normally".

    


    Is there something I need to add to the video for the browser to play it at "normal" speed ?

    


    EDIT

    


    I just compared the two video streams :

    


    original:
Stream #0:0(eng): Video: hevc (Main) (hvc1 / 0x31637668), yuvj420p(pc, bt709), 3840x2160 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 59891 kb/s, 119.88 fps, 119.88 tbr, 120k tbn, 119.88 tbc (default)

Reconstructed:
 Stream #0:0: Video: hevc (Main) (hvc1 / 0x31637668), yuv420p(tv, progressive), 3840x2160 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 763696 kb/s, 120 fps, 120 tbr, 15360 tbn, 15360 tbc (default)


    


    I don't quit understand all of this though. so here's what I notice :

    


    original.         reconstructed
--------------------------------
bt709             progressive
89871 kb/s.       763696 kb/s
119.88 fps.       120 fps
119.88 tbr.       120 tbr
120k tbr.         15360 tbr
11960 tbr.        15360 tbc


    


    Hmm. I suspect it has something to do with tbr and tbc whatever those are, or perhaps the progressive vs the bt709 ? the pirates are also vastly different.