Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/formulaire

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (60)

  • Les vidéos

    21 avril 2011, par

    Comme les documents de type "audio", Mediaspip affiche dans la mesure du possible les vidéos grâce à la balise html5 .
    Un des inconvénients de cette balise est qu’elle n’est pas reconnue correctement par certains navigateurs (Internet Explorer pour ne pas le nommer) et que chaque navigateur ne gère en natif que certains formats de vidéos.
    Son avantage principal quant à lui est de bénéficier de la prise en charge native de vidéos dans les navigateur et donc de se passer de l’utilisation de Flash et (...)

  • Participer à sa traduction

    10 avril 2011

    Vous pouvez nous aider à améliorer les locutions utilisées dans le logiciel ou à traduire celui-ci dans n’importe qu’elle nouvelle langue permettant sa diffusion à de nouvelles communautés linguistiques.
    Pour ce faire, on utilise l’interface de traduction de SPIP où l’ensemble des modules de langue de MediaSPIP sont à disposition. ll vous suffit de vous inscrire sur la liste de discussion des traducteurs pour demander plus d’informations.
    Actuellement MediaSPIP n’est disponible qu’en français et (...)

  • Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins

    27 avril 2010, par

    Mediaspip core
    autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs

Sur d’autres sites (6538)

  • Patent skullduggery : Tandberg rips off x264 algorithm

    25 novembre 2010, par Dark Shikari — patents, ripoffs, x264

    Update : Tandberg claims they came up with the algorithm independently : to be fair, I can actually believe this to some extent, as I think the algorithm is way too obvious to be patented. Of course, they also claim that the algorithm isn’t actually identical, since they don’t want to lose their patent application.

    I still don’t trust them, but it’s possible it’s merely bad research (and thus being unaware of prior art) as opposed to anything malicious. Furthermore, word from within their office suggests they’re quite possibly being honest : supposedly the development team does not read x264 code at all. So this might just all be very bad luck.

    Regardless, the patent is still complete tripe, and should never have been filed.

    Most importantly, stop harassing the guy whose name is on the patent (Lars) : he’s just a programmer, not the management or lawyers responsible for filing the patent. This is stupid and unnecessary. I’ve removed the original post because of this ; it can be found here for those who want to read it.

    Appendix : the details of the patent :

    I figure I’ll go over the exact correspondence between the patent and my code here.

    1. A method for calculating run and level representations of quantized transform coefficients representing pixel values included in a block of a video picture, the method comprising :

    Translation : It’s a run-level coder.

    packing, at a video processing apparatus, each quantized transform coefficients in a value interval [Max, Min] by setting all quantized transform coefficients greater than Max equal to Max, and all quantized transform coefficients less than Min equal to Min

    The quantized coefficients are clipped to a certain valid range to allow them to be packed into bytes (they start as 16-bit values).

    reordering, at the video processing apparatus, the quantized transform ID coefficients according to a predefined order depending on respective positions in the block resulting in an array C of reordered quantized transform coefficients

    This is the zigzag pattern used in H.264 (and most formats) for reordering DCT coefficients. In x264, this is done before the run-level coder ste.

    masking, at the video processing apparatus, C by generating an array M containing ones in positions corresponding to positions of C having non-zero values, and zeros in positions corresponding to positions of C having zero values

    This is creating a bitmask based on the coefficient values, the pmovmskb step.

    is generating, at the video processing apparatus, for each position containing a one in M, a run and a level representation by setting the level value equal to an occurring value in a corresponding position of C ; and setting, at the video processing apparatus, for each position containing a one in M5 the run value equal to the number of proceeding positions relative to a current position in M since a previous occurrence of one in M.

    This is the process of creating run/level values from the bitmask.

    Now into the detailed claims :

    2. The method according to Claim 1, wherein the masking further includes, creating an array C from C where positions corresponding to positions of nonzero values in C are filled with ones, and positions corresponding to positions of zero values in C are filled with zeros, and creating M from C by extracting the most significant bit from values in respective position of C and inserting the bits in corresponding positions in M.

    They’re extracting the most significant bit of the values to create a bitmask. This is exactly what the pmovmskb in my algorithm does.

    3. The method according to Claim 2, wherein the creating of the array C is executed by a C++ function PCMPGTB, and the creating of M from C is executed by a C++ function PMOVMSKB.

    And here they use pcmpgtb (they call it a C++ function for some reason, but it’s a SSE instruction) to do the clipping of the input values. This is exactly the same method I used in decimate_score. They also use pmovmskb as mentioned.

    4. The method according to Claim 1 , wherein the generating of the run and level representation further includes determining positions containing non-zero values in C by corresponding positions containing ones in M.

    5. The method according to Claim 4, wherein the determining of positions containing non-zero values in C is executed by a C++ function BSF.

    Here they iterate over the bitmask of transform coefficients using a “BSF” function to find runs, which is exactly what I did. Of course, BSF isn’t a function, it’s an x86 instruction.

    6. The method according to Claim 1 , wherein Max is 256 and Min is 0.

    This is almost surely a typo or mistake of some sort. They mean the Max should be 255, not 256 : 256 doesn’t fit in a uint8_t.

    7. The method according to Claim 1 , wherein the predefined order follows a zigzag path of transform coefficient positions in the block starting in an upper left corner heading towards a lower right corner.

    This is a description of the typical DCT zigzag pattern (like in H.264, MPEG-2, Theora, etc).

    Everything after this part is just repeating itself with the phrase “an apparatus” added in order to make the USPTO listen to them.

  • Anomalie #4052 : Visualiser ses messages dans le privé

    28 novembre 2017, par tcharlss (*´_ゝ`)

    J’ai bien ce lien sur contrib, spip.net et forum. C’est tout en bas de la boîte d’infos :

    AUTEUR NUMÉRO
    

    6944

    Je suis rédacteur
    4 articles
    24 messages de forum
    Voir en ligne

  • Revision 66064 : Gestion des abonnements aux notifications par la page ...

    19 septembre 2012, par cedric@… — Log

    Gestion des abonnements aux notifications par la page ?page=notifications&amp ;email=xx&amp ;key=yyy qui permet de gerer les abonnements/desabonnements aux threads de forum envoyés à cette adresse mail
    Ajout du message dans le pied du forum dans le squelette du forum
    TODO : gestion du changement d’email d’abonnement