
Recherche avancée
Médias (3)
-
GetID3 - Bloc informations de fichiers
9 avril 2013, par
Mis à jour : Mai 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
-
GetID3 - Boutons supplémentaires
9 avril 2013, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
-
Collections - Formulaire de création rapide
19 février 2013, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
Autres articles (46)
-
Qu’est ce qu’un éditorial
21 juin 2013, parEcrivez votre de point de vue dans un article. Celui-ci sera rangé dans une rubrique prévue à cet effet.
Un éditorial est un article de type texte uniquement. Il a pour objectif de ranger les points de vue dans une rubrique dédiée. Un seul éditorial est placé à la une en page d’accueil. Pour consulter les précédents, consultez la rubrique dédiée.
Vous pouvez personnaliser le formulaire de création d’un éditorial.
Formulaire de création d’un éditorial Dans le cas d’un document de type éditorial, les (...) -
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir -
Contribute to translation
13 avril 2011You can help us to improve the language used in the software interface to make MediaSPIP more accessible and user-friendly. You can also translate the interface into any language that allows it to spread to new linguistic communities.
To do this, we use the translation interface of SPIP where the all the language modules of MediaSPIP are available. Just subscribe to the mailing list and request further informantion on translation.
MediaSPIP is currently available in French and English (...)
Sur d’autres sites (6525)
-
Video Conferencing in HTML5 : WebRTC via Web Sockets
1er janvier 2014, par silviaA bit over a week ago I gave a presentation at Web Directions Code 2012 in Melbourne. Maxine and John asked me to speak about something related to HTML5 video, so I went for the new shiny : WebRTC – real-time communication in the browser.
I only had 20 min, so I had to make it tight. I wanted to show off video conferencing without special plugins in Google Chrome in just a few lines of code, as is the promise of WebRTC. To a large extent, I achieved this. But I made some interesting discoveries along the way. Demos are in the slide deck.
UPDATE : Opera 12 has been released with WebRTC support.
Housekeeping : if you want to replicate what I have done, you need to install a Google Chrome Web Browser 19+. Then make sure you go to chrome ://flags and activate the MediaStream and PeerConnection experiment(s). Restart your browser and now you can experiment with this feature. Big warning up-front : it’s not production-ready, since there are still changes happening to the spec and there is no compatible implementation by another browser yet.
Here is a brief summary of the steps involved to set up video conferencing in your browser :
- Set up a video element each for the local and the remote video stream.
- Grab the local camera and stream it to the first video element.
- (*) Establish a connection to another person running the same Web page.
- Send the local camera stream on that peer connection.
- Accept the remote camera stream into the second video element.
Now, the most difficult part of all of this – believe it or not – is the signalling part that is required to build the peer connection (marked with (*)). Initially I wanted to run completely without a server and just enter the remote’s IP address to establish the connection. This is, however, not a functionality that the PeerConnection object provides [might this be something to add to the spec ?].
So, you need a server known to both parties that can provide for the handshake to set up the connection. All the examples that I have seen, such as https://apprtc.appspot.com/, use a channel management server on Google’s appengine. I wanted it all working with HTML5 technology, so I decided to use a Web Socket server instead.
I implemented my Web Socket server using node.js (code of websocket server). The video conferencing demo is in the slide deck in an iframe – you can also use the stand-alone html page. Works like a treat.
While it is still using Google’s STUN server to get through NAT, the messaging for setting up the connection is running completely through the Web Socket server. The messages that get exchanged are plain SDP message packets with a session ID. There are OFFER, ANSWER, and OK packets exchanged for each streaming direction. You can see some of it in the below image :
I’m not running a public WebSocket server, so you won’t be able to see this part of the presentation working. But the local loopback video should work.
At the conference, it all went without a hitch (while the wireless played along). I believe you have to host the WebSocket server on the same machine as the Web page, otherwise it won’t work for security reasons.
A whole new world of opportunities lies out there when we get the ability to set up video conferencing on every Web page – scary and exciting at the same time !
-
Video Conferencing in HTML5 : WebRTC via Web Sockets
14 juin 2012, par silviaA bit over a week ago I gave a presentation at Web Directions Code 2012 in Melbourne. Maxine and John asked me to speak about something related to HTML5 video, so I went for the new shiny : WebRTC – real-time communication in the browser.
I only had 20 min, so I had to make it tight. I wanted to show off video conferencing without special plugins in Google Chrome in just a few lines of code, as is the promise of WebRTC. To a large extent, I achieved this. But I made some interesting discoveries along the way. Demos are in the slide deck.
UPDATE : Opera 12 has been released with WebRTC support.
Housekeeping : if you want to replicate what I have done, you need to install a Google Chrome Web Browser 19+. Then make sure you go to chrome ://flags and activate the MediaStream and PeerConnection experiment(s). Restart your browser and now you can experiment with this feature. Big warning up-front : it’s not production-ready, since there are still changes happening to the spec and there is no compatible implementation by another browser yet.
Here is a brief summary of the steps involved to set up video conferencing in your browser :
- Set up a video element each for the local and the remote video stream.
- Grab the local camera and stream it to the first video element.
- (*) Establish a connection to another person running the same Web page.
- Send the local camera stream on that peer connection.
- Accept the remote camera stream into the second video element.
Now, the most difficult part of all of this – believe it or not – is the signalling part that is required to build the peer connection (marked with (*)). Initially I wanted to run completely without a server and just enter the remote’s IP address to establish the connection. This is, however, not a functionality that the PeerConnection object provides [might this be something to add to the spec ?].
So, you need a server known to both parties that can provide for the handshake to set up the connection. All the examples that I have seen, such as https://apprtc.appspot.com/, use a channel management server on Google’s appengine. I wanted it all working with HTML5 technology, so I decided to use a Web Socket server instead.
I implemented my Web Socket server using node.js (code of websocket server). The video conferencing demo is in the slide deck in an iframe – you can also use the stand-alone html page. Works like a treat.
While it is still using Google’s STUN server to get through NAT, the messaging for setting up the connection is running completely through the Web Socket server. The messages that get exchanged are plain SDP message packets with a session ID. There are OFFER, ANSWER, and OK packets exchanged for each streaming direction. You can see some of it in the below image :
I’m not running a public WebSocket server, so you won’t be able to see this part of the presentation working. But the local loopback video should work.
At the conference, it all went without a hitch (while the wireless played along). I believe you have to host the WebSocket server on the same machine as the Web page, otherwise it won’t work for security reasons.
A whole new world of opportunities lies out there when we get the ability to set up video conferencing on every Web page – scary and exciting at the same time !
-
FFMpeg How to extract individual audio channels from wav/.w64 and insert in .mxf with track tags
11 septembre 2018, par VinceHi my problem is I have 2 .w64 files (extended wav format) each file has 16 mono channels of audio. I want to be able to extract specific channels of audio from each of those .w64 files and insert those channels into an .mxf file as separate single channel mono audio streams and to be additionally able to set the Tag information on those audio streams. I have tried using -map and so on but it seems to take all the channels from the .w64 files and insert a single audio stream of 16 channels. I apologise in advance as I’m very new to ffmpeg and thanks in advance for any advice any of you can offer. This is all specific to command line usage on windows.
All the bestffmpeg -i "D :\Media\AUDIO_0.W64" -i "D :\media\NO_AUDIO.mxf" -c copy -map 0:0:0 -map 0:0:1 -map 0:0:2 -acodec pcm_s24le -map 1:0 "D :\media\out.mxf"
ffmpeg version N-67838-g4388e78 Copyright (c) 2000-2014 the FFmpeg developers
built on Nov 19 2014 22:02:08 with gcc 4.9.2 (GCC)
configuration: --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --disable-w32threads --enable-av
isynth --enable-bzlib --enable-fontconfig --enable-frei0r --enable-gnutls --enab
le-iconv --enable-libass --enable-libbluray --enable-libbs2b --enable-libcaca --
enable-libfreetype --enable-libgme --enable-libgsm --enable-libilbc --enable-lib
modplug --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrw
b --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopus --enable-librtmp --enable-libschroedinge
r --enable-libsoxr --enable-libspeex --enable-libtheora --enable-libtwolame --en
able-libvidstab --enable-libvo-aacenc --enable-libvo-amrwbenc --enable-libvorbis
--enable-libvpx --enable-libwavpack --enable-libwebp --enable-libx264 --enable-
libx265 --enable-libxavs --enable-libxvid --enable-zlib
libavutil 54. 14.100 / 54. 14.100
libavcodec 56. 12.101 / 56. 12.101
libavformat 56. 14.100 / 56. 14.100
libavdevice 56. 3.100 / 56. 3.100
libavfilter 5. 2.103 / 5. 2.103
libswscale 3. 1.101 / 3. 1.101
libswresample 1. 1.100 / 1. 1.100
libpostproc 53. 3.100 / 53. 3.100
[w64 @ 0481c580] Estimating duration from bitrate, this may be inaccurate
Input #0, w64, from 'D:\Media\AUDIO_0.W64':
Duration: 00:01:02.56, bitrate: 18432 kb/s
Stream #0:0: Audio: pcm_s24le ([1][0][0][0] / 0x0001), 48000 Hz, 16 channels
, s32 (24 bit), 18432 kb/s
[mxf @ 048890e0] index entry 1564 + TemporalOffset 1 = 1565, which is out of bou
nds
Input #1, mxf, from 'D:\media\NO_AUDIO.mxf':
Metadata:
uid : adab4424-2f25-4dc7-92ff-29bd000c0000
generation_uid : adab4424-2f25-4dc7-92ff-29bd000c0001
company_name : FFmpeg
product_name : OP1a Muxer
product_version : 57.56.100
product_uid : adab4424-2f25-4dc7-92ff-29bd000c0002
modification_date: 0000-01-01 00:00:00
timecode : 00:00:00:00
Duration: 00:01:02.60, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 2404 kb/s
Stream #1:0: Video: mpeg2video (4:2:2), yuv422p(tv), 1920x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR16:9], max. 50000 kb/s, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 25 tbn, 50 tbc
File 'D:\media\out.mxf' already exists. Overwrite ? [y/N] y
[mxf @ 04891c60] there must be exactly one video stream and it must be the first
one
Output #0, mxf, to 'D:\media\out.mxf':
Metadata:
encoder : Lavf56.14.100
Stream #0:0: Audio: pcm_s24le, 48000 Hz, 16 channels, s32 (24 bit), 18432 kb/s
Metadata:
encoder : Lavc56.12.101 pcm_s24le
Stream #0:1: Audio: pcm_s24le, 48000 Hz, 16 channels, s32 (24 bit), 18432 kb/s
Metadata:
encoder : Lavc56.12.101 pcm_s24le
Stream #0:2: Audio: pcm_s24le, 48000 Hz, 16 channels, s32 (24 bit), 18432 kb/s
Metadata:
encoder : Lavc56.12.101 pcm_s24le
Stream #0:3: Video: mpeg2video, yuv422p, 1920x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], q=2-31, max. 50000 kb/s, 25 fps, 25 tbn, 25 tbc
Stream mapping:
Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (pcm_s24le (native) -> pcm_s24le (native))
Stream #0:0 -> #0:1 (pcm_s24le (native) -> pcm_s24le (native))
Stream #0:0 -> #0:2 (pcm_s24le (native) -> pcm_s24le (native))
Stream #1:0 -> #0:3 (copy)
Could not write header for output file #0 (incorrect codec parameters ?): Error
number -1 occurred