
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Carte de Schillerkiez
13 mai 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Texte
Autres articles (59)
-
Websites made with MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parThis page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.
-
Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond
5 septembre 2013, parCertains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;
-
Ecrire une actualité
21 juin 2013, parPrésentez les changements dans votre MédiaSPIP ou les actualités de vos projets sur votre MédiaSPIP grâce à la rubrique actualités.
Dans le thème par défaut spipeo de MédiaSPIP, les actualités sont affichées en bas de la page principale sous les éditoriaux.
Vous pouvez personnaliser le formulaire de création d’une actualité.
Formulaire de création d’une actualité Dans le cas d’un document de type actualité, les champs proposés par défaut sont : Date de publication ( personnaliser la date de publication ) (...)
Sur d’autres sites (7050)
-
FFmpeg conversion FROM UYVY422 TO YUV420P
25 avril 2015, par risqueI have raw video in UYVY422 format and I want to convert it YUV420p.
I’am executing that command()ffmpeg -y -r 25.0 -f rawvideo -s 1920x1080 -pix_fmt uyvy422 -i input.avi -pix_fmt yuv420p -f avi -r 25 -s 1920x1080 output.avi
and my output video seems to float(right side of video start to be present at left edge and it is moving from left to right)
Has anyone got any idea about what I am doing wrong ? I was trying to set output video to raw format, but it didnt work...
-
Tour of Part of the VP8 Process
18 novembre 2010, par Multimedia Mike — VP8My toy VP8 encoder outputs a lot of textual data to illustrate exactly what it’s doing. For those who may not be exactly clear on how this or related algorithms operate, this may prove illuminating.
Let’s look at subblock 0 of macroblock 0 of a luma plane :
subblock 0 (original) 92 91 89 86 91 90 88 86 89 89 89 88 89 87 88 93
Since it’s in the top-left corner of the image to be encoded, the phantom samples above and to the left are implicitly 128 for the purpose of intra prediction (in the VP8 algorithm).
subblock 0 (original) 128 128 128 128 128 92 91 89 86 128 91 90 88 86 128 89 89 89 88 128 89 87 88 93
Using the 4×4 DC prediction mode means averaging the 4 top predictors and 4 left predictors. So, the predictor is 128. Subtract this from each element of the subblock :subblock 0, predictor removed -36 -37 -39 -42 -37 -38 -40 -42 -39 -39 -39 -40 -39 -41 -40 -35
Next, run the subblock through the forward transform :
subblock 0, transformed -312 7 1 0 1 12 -5 2 2 -3 3 -1 1 0 -2 1
Quantize (integer divide) each element ; the DC (first element) and AC (rest of the elements) quantizers are both 4 :
subblock 0, quantized -78 1 0 0 0 3 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The above block contains the coefficients that are actually transmitted (zigzagged and entropy-encoded) through the bitstream and decoded on the other end.
The decoding process looks something like this– after the same coefficients are decoded and rearranged, they are dequantized (multiplied) by the original quantizers :
subblock 0, dequantized -312 4 0 0 0 12 -4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Note that these coefficients are not exactly the same as the original, pre-quantized coefficients. This is a large part of where the “lossy” in “lossy video compression” comes from.
Next, the decoder generates a base predictor subblock. In this case, it’s all 128 (DC prediction for top-left subblock) :
subblock 0, predictor 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128
Finally, the dequantized coefficients are shoved through the inverse transform and added to the base predictor block :
subblock 0, reconstructed 91 91 89 85 90 90 89 87 89 88 89 90 88 88 89 92
Again, not exactly the same as the original block, but an incredible facsimile thereof.
Note that this decoding-after-encoding demonstration is not merely pedagogical– the encoder has to decode the subblock because the encoding of successive subblocks may depend on this subblock. The encoder can’t rely on the original representation of the subblock because the decoder won’t have that– it will have the reconstructed block.
For example, here’s the next subblock :
subblock 1 (original) 84 84 87 90 85 85 86 93 86 83 83 89 91 85 84 87
Let’s assume DC prediction once more. The 4 top predictors are still all 128 since this subblock lies along the top row. However, the 4 left predictors are the right edge of the subblock reconstructed in the previous example :
subblock 1 (original) 128 128 128 128 85 84 84 87 90 87 85 85 86 93 90 86 83 83 89 92 91 85 84 87
The DC predictor is computed as
(128 + 128 + 128 + 128 + 85 + 87 + 90 + 92 + 4) / 8 = 108
(the extra +4 is for rounding considerations). (Note that in this case, using the original subblock’s right edge would also have resulted in 108, but that’s beside the point.)Continuing through the same process as in subblock 0 :
subblock 1, predictor removed -24 -24 -21 -18 -23 -23 -22 -15 -22 -25 -25 -19 -17 -23 -24 -21
subblock 1, transformed
-173 -9 14 -1
2 -11 -4 0
1 6 -2 3
-5 1 0 1subblock 1, quantized
-43 -2 3 0
0 -2 -1 0
0 1 0 0
-1 0 0 0subblock 1, dequantized
-172 -8 12 0
0 -8 -4 0
0 4 0 0
-4 0 0 0subblock 1, predictor
108 108 108 108
108 108 108 108
108 108 108 108
108 108 108 108subblock 1, reconstructed
84 84 87 89
86 85 87 91
86 83 84 89
90 85 84 88I hope this concrete example (straight from a working codec) clarifies this part of the VP8 process.
-
Why does ffmpeg burn Chinese subtitles(ass) without word wrap?
10 mai 2023, par bjjoymy ffmpeg burn subtitle example


ffmpeg burn ass subtitle to mp4. The properties WrapStyle(0:word wrap, 1 : the char '\N' or movie edge force change line, 2 : only \n and \N change line).


English subtitle run OK.
Chinese subtitle has no word wrap when WrapStyle=0.