Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (50)

  • List of compatible distributions

    26 avril 2011, par

    The table below is the list of Linux distributions compatible with the automated installation script of MediaSPIP. Distribution nameVersion nameVersion number Debian Squeeze 6.x.x Debian Weezy 7.x.x Debian Jessie 8.x.x Ubuntu The Precise Pangolin 12.04 LTS Ubuntu The Trusty Tahr 14.04
    If you want to help us improve this list, you can provide us access to a machine whose distribution is not mentioned above or send the necessary fixes to add (...)

  • HTML5 audio and video support

    13 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
    The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
    For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
    MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...)

  • De l’upload à la vidéo finale [version standalone]

    31 janvier 2010, par

    Le chemin d’un document audio ou vidéo dans SPIPMotion est divisé en trois étapes distinctes.
    Upload et récupération d’informations de la vidéo source
    Dans un premier temps, il est nécessaire de créer un article SPIP et de lui joindre le document vidéo "source".
    Au moment où ce document est joint à l’article, deux actions supplémentaires au comportement normal sont exécutées : La récupération des informations techniques des flux audio et video du fichier ; La génération d’une vignette : extraction d’une (...)

Sur d’autres sites (6441)

  • Revision e4686c589e : Fix slightly quality drop caused at speed 1. We would skip the rectangular bloc

    19 juillet 2013, par Ronald S. Bultje

    Changed Paths :
     Modify /vp9/encoder/vp9_encodeframe.c



    Fix slightly quality drop caused at speed 1.

    We would skip the rectangular blocks for sub8x8 partitions because
    we would conclude that PARTITION_NONE was better than PARTITION_SPLIT,
    however, that conclusion was made before we actually really tested
    PARTITION_SPLIT.

    Change-Id : I8fa91e59894badc1d8cee3ba8a49e40ae4c4a489

  • x264 library speed - Altivec vs SSE2 -

    25 février 2013, par Omer Merdan

    I have simple cheap dualcore intel-3ghz-debian and access to super-expensive powerPc7-Aix.

    And after few days of strugle, i compiled libx264 and tested it on both computers :

    1. GCC : library x264 on intel (with SSE2 capabilities) and
    2. GCC on 16 core powerPc (with altivec).

    ... and result is that cheap intel is x2 times faster ! (with altivec disabled, intel is 10x times faster)

    My question : is this normal ?
    Does all other powerPC-users have same results ? Can powerPc-altivec-optimisation of x264 library work at same speed with intel... or MMX/SSE optimisation is officially at least 2 times faster for this library ?

    I am not interested in multi-thread options. Number of cores and threads are irrelevant. Just simple one-thread x264 encoding with default "medium preset" using rawvideo as source, sse vs altivec.

    Maybe native Aix XLC compiler provide better results ? (i managed only gcc to work)

    ... mac-powerpc-users maybe know something about this.

    powrPc7-Aix:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
    
x264: 64-bit XCOFF
    
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: Altivec
    
time: real 0m33.559s
    
---
    
intelDebian:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
    
x264: ELF 32-bit LSB executable
    
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
    
time: real 0m16.503s

  • x264 library speed - Altivec vs SSE4 -

    15 août 2015, par Asain Kujovic

    I have simple cheap dualcore intel-3ghz-debian and access to super-expensive powerPc7-Aix.

    And after few days of strugle, i compiled libx264 and tested it on both computers :

    1. GCC : library x264 on intel (with SSE2 capabilities) and
    2. GCC on 16 core powerPc (with altivec).

    ... and result is that cheap intel is x2 times faster ! (with altivec disabled, intel is 10x times faster)

    My question : is this normal ?
    Does all other powerPC-users have same results ? Can powerPc-altivec-optimisation of x264 library work at same speed with intel... or MMX/SSE optimisation is officially at least 2 times faster for this library ?

    I am not interested in multi-thread options. Number of cores and threads are irrelevant. Just simple one-thread x264 encoding with default "medium preset" using rawvideo as source, sse vs altivec.

    Maybe native Aix XLC compiler provide better results ? (i managed only gcc to work)

    ... mac-powerpc-users maybe know something about this.

    powrPc7-Aix:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
    
x264: 64-bit XCOFF
    
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: Altivec
    
time: real 0m33.559s
    
---
    
intelDebian:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
    
x264: ELF 32-bit LSB executable
    
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
    
time: real 0m16.503s

Navigation