Advanced search

On other websites (4349)

• 7 Reasons to Migrate from Google Analytics to Matomo Now

  15 May 2022, by Erin

  The release of Google Analytics 4 (GA4), and the subsequent depreciation of Universal Analytics, has caused a stir amongst webmasters, SEO experts, marketers and the likes.

  Google’s Universal Analytics is the most widely used web analytics platform in the world, but from 1 July 2023, it will no longer process any new data. Google is now pushing users to set up GA4 tracking imminently.

  If you’re like many and wondering if you should upgrade to Google Analytics 4, there are two key reasons why this might be a risk:

  1. GDPR violations: recent rulings have deemed Google Analytics illegal in France and Austria, and it’s likely that this trend will continue across the EU.
  2. Data loss: users switching to Google Analytics 4 can’t migrate their data from Universal Analytics.

  To mitigate these risks, many organisations are looking to switch to a Google Analytics alternative like Matomo. This is an ideal option for organisations that want to take ownership of their data, get compliant with privacy regulations and save themselves the stress of Google deprecating the software they rely on.

  Whilst there are two major reasons to steer clear of Google Analytics 4, there are 7 reasons why migrating to Matomo instead could save your business time, money and peace of mind.

  If you want to avoid the pitfalls of GA4 and are thinking about migrating from Universal Analytics to Matomo, here’s why you should make the switch now.

  1. Keep your historical Universal Analytics data

  Users switching to Google Analytics 4 will be disappointed to find out that GA4 does not accept data imports from Universal Analytics. On top of that, Google also announced that after Universal Analytics stops processing new data (1 July 2023), users will only be able to access this data for “at least six months”. 

  Years of valuable insights will be completely wiped and organisations will not be able to report on year over year results.

  Fortunately, any organisation using Universal Analytics can import this data into Matomo using our Google Analytics Importer plugin. So you can reduce business disruptions and retain years of valuable web analytics data when you switch to Matomo.

  Our comprehensive migration documentation features a handy video, written guides and FAQs to ensure a smooth migration process.

  2. Ease of use

  Web analytics is complicated enough without having to navigate confusing platform user interfaces (UIs). One of GA4’s biggest drawbacks is the “awful and unusable” interface which has received an overwhelming amount of negative backlash online. 

  Matomo’s intuitive UI contains many of the familiar features that made Universal Analytics so well-liked. You’ll find the same popular features like Visitors, Behaviour, and Acquisition to name a few.

  

  User Flow in Matomo

  When you switch to Matomo you can get up to speed quickly and spend more time focusing on high-value tasks, rather than learning about everything new in GA4.

  3. 100% accurate unsampled data

  GA4 implements data sampling and machine learning to fill gaps. Often what you are basing critical business decisions on is actually an estimate of activity. 

  Matomo does not use data sampling, so this guarantees you will always see the full picture.

  “My primary reason to use Matomo is to get the unsampled data, [...] if your website gets lots of traffic and you can’t afford an enterprise level tool like GA premium [GA360] then Matomo is your best choice.”

  With Matomo you can be confident your data-driven decisions are being made with real data.

  4. Privacy by design

  Built-in privacy has always been at the core of Matomo. One key method we use to achieve this, is by giving you 100% data ownership of your web analytics data. You don’t ever have to worry about the data landing in the wrong hands or being used in unethical ways – like unsolicited advertising. 

  On the contrary, Google Analytics is regularly under fire for controversial uses of data. While Google has made changes to make GA4 more privacy-focused, it’s all just smoke and mirrors. The data collected from Google Analytics accounts is used by Google to create digital profiles on internet users, which is then used for advertising. 

  Consumers are becoming increasingly concerned about how businesses are using their data. Businesses that develop privacy strategies, utilise privacy-focused tools will gain a competitive advantage and a loyal customer-base. 

  Prioritise the protection of your user data by switching to a privacy-by-design analytics solution.

  5. Compliance with global privacy laws

  To date, Google Analytics has been deemed illegal to use in France and Austria due to data transfers to the US. Upgrading to GA4 doesn’t make this problem go away either since data is still transferred to the US. 

  Matomo is easily configured to follow even the strictest of privacy laws like GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, LGPD and PECR. Here’s how:

  • Matomo’s opt-out mechanism lets users opt-out of web analytics tracking
  • You can configure analytics for data retention of raw data and aggregated reports
  • Users can anonymise IP addresses as well as implement other data anonymisation techniques
  • Matomo can respect DoNotTrack setting
  • Users can set up Matomo so it doesn’t process any personal data or PII (personally identifiable information)
  • It’s easy to set shorter expiration dates for tracking cookies
  • Matomo allows you to disable Visits Log and Visitor Profile
  • Users aren’t tracked across websites unless specifically enabled

  Matomo can also be used without cookie consent banners (unlike with Google Analytics, which will always need user consent to track). Matomo has been approved by the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) as one of the select few web analytics tools that can be used to collect data without tracking consent.

  Every year more countries are drafting legislation that mirrors the European Union’s GDPR (like the Brazilian LGPD). Matomo is designed to stay data-privacy law compliant, and always will be.

  Stay on top of global privacy laws and reduce the time you spend on compliance by switching to a privacy-compliant solution. 

  6. All-in-one web analytics

  Matomo gives you easy access to Heatmaps, Session Recordings, A/B testing, Funnels analytics, and more right out of the box. This means that digital marketing, UX and procurement teams won’t need to set up and manage multiple tools for behavioural analytics – it’s all in one place.

  Learn more about your audience, save money and reduce complexity by switching to an all-in-one analytics solution.

  Check out Matomo’s extensive product features.

  

  Page Scroll Depth in Matomo

  7. Tag Manager built-in

  Unlike GA4, the Matomo Tag Manager comes built-in for an efficient and consistent user experience. Matomo Tag Manager offers a pain-free solution for embedding tracking codes on your website without needing help from a web developer or someone with technical knowledge.

  Help your Marketing team track more website actions and give time back to your web developer by switching to Matomo Tag Manager.

  Final Thoughts

  Google Analytics is free to use, but the surrounding legal issues with the platform and implications of switching to GA4 will make migrating a tough choice for many businesses. 

  Now is the chance for organisations to step away from the advertising tech giant, take ownership of web analytics data and get compliant. Switch to the leading Google Analytics alternative and see why over 1 million websites choose Matomo for their web analytics.

  Ready to get started with your own Google Analytics to Matomo migration? Try Matomo free for 21 days now – no credit card required. 

  21 day free trial. No credit card required.

  Your email address
  

  Your website address
  

  Your Analytics subdomain will be .matomo.cloud (change)

  Choose your analytics subdomain
  

  .matomo.cloud

  I hereby accept the terms and conditions and the data processing agreeement (DPA).

  
  Your information will be used to create an account on our cloud service. For more information please consult our privacy policy.
  
  

  » Start improving your websites now

  

• Evolution #3483: #FORMULAIRE_MOT_DE_PASSE dans la dist

  27 June 2018, by Anonyme

  Tiens, j’avais oublié cette fiche faite par Maieul à ma demande lorsque j’avais pas de compte. Toutes mes fiches ayant déjà été fermées d’office.
  (style : on ferme A car on décide que c’est un doublon de B et vice versa)
  Celle-ci peut également être fermée, car comme je l’ai précisé dans cette conversation (https://contrib.spip.net/Pour-un-fonctionnement-communautaire-efficace-dans-la#forum492387) la boite a abandonné SPIP
  Quand à mes 4 sites familiaux, ils n’ont pas les milliers de personnes à gérer des précédents : je peux faire les modifications à la main :-)
  Me reste plus qu’à désactiver mon compte
  Encore merci Maieul
  Et bon vent à l’équipe

• Evolution #4148: Augmenter la largeur de l’espace privé

  13 June 2018, by tcharlss (*´_ゝ｀)

  Super nicod_, merci pour les remarques et le boulot :)

  Alors concernant la largeur, 1200px ce serait déjà beaucoup mieux.
  Mais pour ma part je pense que du 100% serait toujours la meilleur option. Au début ça fait un peu bizarre je le concède, mais on s’y fait vite et c’est dur de revenir sur une largeur fixe après. Pour les tableaux / listes d’objets par exemple ça devient vite indispensable. Le menu ne me pose pas de problème non plus : on comprend que les items sont alignés à gauche.

  Il y a bien certains contenus qui doivent être limité en largeur pour avoir 80 caractères par ligne c’est vrai, mais il s’agit de quelques blocs à identifier, et ça reste valable quelque soit la largeur globale de l’interface.
  Pour l’instant je ne vois que 2 blocs concernés : le #wysiwyg et les formulaires d’édition.
  Donc mon constat c’est : à partir du moment où on limite la largeur de certains blocs qui contiennent du texte afin que ça reste lisible, pourquoi limiter arbitrairement la largeur globale de l’interface ?
  Dans le plugin privé fluide, seul le #wysiwyg est ciblé pour l’instant. Attention il reste aussi des petits problèmes à régler dans certains cas, cf. capture d’écran.

  Pour comparaison, avec RastaPopoulos on avait installé une floppée de CMS pour étudier leurs interfaces au moment où on s’intéressait au sujet, et ils ont tous une largeur 100%.
  Je ne dis pas qu’il faut suivre bêtement ce que font les autres, mais ça donne des exemples concrets de choix de layouts qui fonctionnent.

  Sur la question de rendre cette largeur configurable, je ne suis pas très chaud. C’est exactement pour ça que j’avais fait le plugin privé fluide dans mon coin alors qu’il existe déjà le plugin d’Ybbet : je pense que l’interface doit être d’office adaptée à tous les écrans, sans rien à configurer. Aucune envie d’avoir à configurer ça sur chaque nouvelle instance de SPIP qu’on déploie :p

  Du coup on écrivant tout ça, je verrais finalement la chose comme ça :

  • Largeur globale 100%
  • Supprimer carrément la préférence utilisateur « taille de l’écran »
  • Jusqu’à 1200px : 2 colonnes (#navigation + #extra | #contenu)
  • Au-delà : 3 colonnes (#navigation | #contenu | #extra)

  Du coup en écran large on aurait toujours 3 colonnes et ça équilibre un peu plus.
  Et plutôt que du flex, je pense qu’on pourrait partir directement sur du css grid, avec un bête fallback en float pour les vieux navigateurs.
  Parceque du coup je ne vois pas comment mettre la colonne #extra soit en dessous de #navigation, soit à droite de #contenu juste avec du flex.