Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (63)

  • Participer à sa traduction

    10 avril 2011

    Vous pouvez nous aider à améliorer les locutions utilisées dans le logiciel ou à traduire celui-ci dans n’importe qu’elle nouvelle langue permettant sa diffusion à de nouvelles communautés linguistiques.
    Pour ce faire, on utilise l’interface de traduction de SPIP où l’ensemble des modules de langue de MediaSPIP sont à disposition. ll vous suffit de vous inscrire sur la liste de discussion des traducteurs pour demander plus d’informations.
    Actuellement MediaSPIP n’est disponible qu’en français et (...)

  • Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins

    27 avril 2010, par

    Mediaspip core
    autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs

  • Contribute to translation

    13 avril 2011

    You can help us to improve the language used in the software interface to make MediaSPIP more accessible and user-friendly. You can also translate the interface into any language that allows it to spread to new linguistic communities.
    To do this, we use the translation interface of SPIP where the all the language modules of MediaSPIP are available. Just subscribe to the mailing list and request further informantion on translation.
    MediaSPIP is currently available in French and English (...)

Sur d’autres sites (14216)

  • Using ffmpeg WITHOUT x264 or mpeg4

    10 février 2020, par FunkyPizza

    So I’ve recently started implementing ffmpeg in an application that I do intend to distribute commercially. And I’ve had an hard time getting my head around the whole licensing process.

    The most commonly answered question I’ve seen seems to be about x264 which requires a paid licence from x264.org in order to use it commercially (right ?). I started to look into mpeg4 instead but that too seemed to be locked behind some licensing fee (https://www.mpegla.com/programs/mpeg-4-visual/license-agreement/).

    I guess my question is the following, what video encoders compatible with FFMPEG are fully free to use ?

  • Bash : sort find results using part of a filename

    13 novembre 2015, par utt50

    I have 3 webcams set up in a building, uploading still images to a webserver. I’m using ffmpeg to encode the jpgs to mp4 video.

    The directories are set up like this :

    Cam1/201504
    
Cam1/201505
    
Cam2/201504
    
Cam2/201505
    
Cam3/201504
    
Cam3/201505

    I’m using the following bash loop/ffmpeg parameters to make one video per camera, per year. This works well so far (well... except that my SSD is rapidly degrading in performance - too many simultaneous read/write operations ?) :

    find Cam2/2013* -name "*.jpg" -print0 | xargs -0 cat | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 30 -vcodec mjpeg -i - -vcodec libx264 -profile:v baseline -level 3.0 -movflags +faststart -crf 19 -pix_fmt yuv420p -r 30 "Cam2-2013-30fps-19crf.mp4"

    The individual files are named like this (confusing ffmpeg’s built-in file sequencer) :

    Cam1_2015052413543201.jpg
    
Cam1_2015052413544601.jpg
    
Cam2_2015052413032601.jpg
    
Cam2_2015052413544901.jpg

    I now need to create one video for an entire year across all 3 cameras, ordered by timestamp. To accomplish this, I need to sort the find results by the segment of the filename after the underscore.

    What do I pipe the find output to to accomplish this ? For example, the files above would be ordered like this :

    Cam2_2015052413032601.jpg
    
Cam1_2015052413543201.jpg
    
Cam1_2015052413544601.jpg
    
Cam2_2015052413544901.jpg

    Any help is very much appreciated !

  • Merge commit 'd31f46e1999fab31be46f0cbce0546a5aa49fe48'

    5 mai 2017, par Clément Bœsch
    Merge commit 'd31f46e1999fab31be46f0cbce0546a5aa49fe48'

    * commit 'd31f46e1999fab31be46f0cbce0546a5aa49fe48' :
    
  cmdutils : update copyright year to 2017
    

    This commit is a noop, see d800d48fc67208819c2a4ae5eb214ca5e3ad7e82
    

    Merged-by : Clément Bœsch <cboesch@gopro.com>

Navigation