Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (52)

  • Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond

    5 septembre 2013, par

    Certains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;

  • Ecrire une actualité

    21 juin 2013, par

    Présentez les changements dans votre MédiaSPIP ou les actualités de vos projets sur votre MédiaSPIP grâce à la rubrique actualités.
    Dans le thème par défaut spipeo de MédiaSPIP, les actualités sont affichées en bas de la page principale sous les éditoriaux.
    Vous pouvez personnaliser le formulaire de création d’une actualité.
    Formulaire de création d’une actualité Dans le cas d’un document de type actualité, les champs proposés par défaut sont : Date de publication ( personnaliser la date de publication ) (...)

  • Publier sur MédiaSpip

    13 juin 2013

    Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
    Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir

Sur d’autres sites (4034)

  • Google Analytics 4 and GDPR : Everything You Need to Know

    17 mai 2022, par Erin

    Four years have passed since the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR, also known as DSGVO in German, and RGPD in French) took effect.

    That’s ample time to get compliant, especially for an organisation as big and innovative as Google. Or is it ? 

    If you are wondering how GDPR affects Google Analytics 4 and what the compliance status is at present, here’s the lowdown. 

    Is Google Analytics 4 GDPR Compliant ?

    No. As of mid-2022, Google Analytics 4 (GA4) isn’t fully GDPR compliant. Despite adding extra privacy-focused features, GA4 still has murky status with the European regulators. After the invalidation of the Privacy Shield framework in 2020, Google is yet to regulate EU-US data protection. At present, the company doesn’t sufficiently protect EU citizens’ and residents’ data against US surveillance laws. This is a direct breach of GDPR.

    Google Analytics and GDPR : a Complex Relationship 

    European regulators have scrutinised Google since GDPR came into effect in 2018.

    While the company took steps to prepare for GDPR provisions, it didn’t fully comply with important regulations around user data storage, transfer and security.

    The relationship between Google and EU regulators got more heated after the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) invalidated the Privacy Shield — a leeway Google used for EU-US data transfers. After 2020, GDPR litigation against Google followed. 

    This post summarises the main milestones in this story and explains the consequences for Google Analytics users. 

    Google Analytics and GDPR Timeline

    2018 : Google Analytics Meets GDPR 

    In 2018, the EU adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) — a set of privacy and data security laws, covering all member states. Every business interacting with EU citizens and/or residents had to comply.

    GDPR harmonised data protection laws across member states and put down extra provisions for what constitutes sensitive personal information (or PII). Broadly, PII includes any data about the person’s :

    • Racial or ethnic origin 
    • Employment status 
    • Religious or political beliefs
    • State of health 
    • Genetic or biometric data 
    • Financial records (such as payment method data)
    • Address and phone numbers 

    Businesses were barred from collecting this information without explicit consent (and even with it in some cases). If collected, such sensitive information is also subject to strict requirements on how it should be stored, secured, transferred and used. 

    7 Main GDPR Principles Explained 

    Article 5 of the GDPR lays out seven main GDPR principles for personal data and privacy protection : 

    • Lawfulness, fairness and transparency — data must be obtained legally, collected with consent and in adherence to laws. 
    • Purpose limitation — all personal information must be collected for specified, explicit and legal purposes. 
    • Data minimisation — companies must collect only necessary and adequate data, aligned with the stated purpose. 
    • Accuracy — data accuracy must be ensured at all times. Companies must have mechanisms to erase or correct inaccurate data without delays. 
    • Storage limitation — data must be stored only for as long as the stated purpose suggests. Though there’s no upper time limit on data storage. 
    • Integrity and confidentiality (security) — companies must take measures to ensure secure data storage and prevent unlawful or unauthorised access to it. 
    • Accountability — companies must be able to demonstrate adherence to the above principles. 

    Google claimed to have taken steps to make all of their products GDPR compliant ahead of the deadline. But in practice, this wasn’t always the case.

    In March 2018, a group of publishers admonished Google for not providing them with enough tools for GDPR compliance :

    “[Y]ou refuse to provide publishers with any specific information about how you will collect, share and use the data. Placing the full burden of obtaining new consent on the publisher is untenable without providing the publisher with the specific information needed to provide sufficient transparency or to obtain the requisite specific, granular and informed consent under the GDPR.”

    The proposed Google Analytics GDPR consent form was hard to implement and lacked customisation options. In fact, Google “makes unilateral decisions” on how the collected data is stored and used. 

    Users had no way to learn about or control all intended uses of people’s data — which made compliance with the second clause impossible. 

    Unsurprisingly, Google was among the first companies to face a GDPR lawsuit (together with Facebook). 

    By 2019, French data regulator CNIL, successfully argued that Google wasn’t sufficiently disclosing its data collection across products — and hence in breach of GDPR. After a failed appeal, Google had to pay a €50 million fine and promise to do better. 

    2019 : Google Analytics 4 Announcement 

    Throughout 2019, Google rightfully attempted to resolve some of its GDPR shortcomings across all products, Google Universal Analytics (UA) included. 

    They added a more visible consent mechanism for online tracking and provided extra compliance tips for users to follow. In the background, Google also made tech changes to its data processing mechanism to get on the good side of regulations.

    Though Google addressed some of the issues, they missed others. A 2019 independent investigation found that Google real-time-bidding (RTB) ad auctions still used EU citizens’ and residents’ data without consent, thanks to a loophole called “Push Pages”. But they managed to quickly patch this up before the allegations had made it to court. 

    In November 2019, Google released a beta version of the new product version — Google Analytics 4, due to replace Universal Analytics. 

    GA4 came with a set of new privacy-focused features for ticking GDPR boxes such as :

    • Data deletion mechanism. Users can now request to surgically extract certain data from the Analytics servers via a new interface. 
    • Shorter data retention period. You can now shorten the default retention period to 2 months by default (instead of 14 months) or add a custom limit.  
    • IP Anonymisation. GA4 doesn’t log or store IP addresses by default. 

    Google Analytics also updated its data processing terms and made changes to its privacy policy

    Though Google made some progress, Google Analytics 4 still has many limitations — and isn’t GDPR compliant. 

    2020 : Privacy Shield Invalidation Ruling 

    As part of the 2018 GDPR preparations, Google named its Irish entity (Google Ireland Limited) as the “data controller” legally responsible for EEA and Swiss users’ information. 

    The company announcement says : 

    Google Analytics Statement on Privacy Shield Invalidation Ruling
    Source : Google

    Initially, Google assumed that this legal change would help them ensure GDPR compliance as “legally speaking” a European entity was set in charge of European data. 

    Practically, however, EEA consumers’ data was still primarily transferred and processed in the US — where most Google data centres are located. Until 2020, such cross-border data transfers were considered legal thanks to the Privacy Shield framework

    But in July 2020, The EU Court of Justice ruled that this framework doesn’t provide adequate data protection to digitally transmitted data against US surveillance laws. Hence, companies like Google can no longer use it. The Swiss Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (FDPIC) reached the same conclusion in September 2020. 

    The invalidation of the Privacy Shield framework put Google in a tough position.

     Article 14. f of the GDPR explicitly states : 

    “The controller (the company) that intends to carry out a transfer of personal data to a recipient (Analytics solution) in a third country or an international organisation must provide its users with information on the place of processing and storage of its data”.

    Invalidation of the Privacy Shield framework prohibited Google from moving data to the US. At the same time, GDPR provisions mandated that they must disclose proper data location. 

    But Google Analytics (like many other products) had no a mechanism for : 

    • Guaranteeing intra-EU data storage 
    • Selecting a designated regional storage location 
    • Informing users about data storage location or data transfers outside of the EU 

    And these factors made Google Analytics in direct breach of GDPR — a territory, where they remain as of 2022.

    2020-2022 : Google GDPR Breaches and Fines 

    The 2020 ruling opened Google to GDPR lawsuits from country-specific data regulators.

    Google Analytics in particular was under a heavy cease-fire. 

    • Sweden first fined Google for violating GDPR for no not fulfilling its obligations to request data delisting in 2020. 
    • France rejected Google Analytics 4 IP address anonymisation function as a sufficient measure for protecting cross-border data transfers. Even with it, US intelligence services can still access user IPs and other PII. France declared Google Analytics illegal and pressed a €150 million fine. 
    • Austria also found Google Analytics GDPR non-compliant and proclaimed the service as “illegal”. The authority now seeks a fine too. 

    The Dutch Data Protection Authority and  Norwegian Data Protection Authority also found Google Analytics guilty of a GDPR breach and seek to limit Google Analytics usage. 

    New privacy controls in Google Analytics 4 do not resolve the underlying issue — unregulated, non-consensual EU-US data transfer. 

    Google Analytics GDPR non-compliance effectively opens any website tracking or analysing European visitors to legal persecution.

    In fact, this is already happening. noyb, a European privacy-focused NGO, has already filed over 100 lawsuits against European websites using Google Analytics.

    2022 : Privacy Shield 2.0. Negotiations

    Google isn’t the only US company affected by the Privacy Shield framework invalidation. The ruling puts thousands of digital companies at risk of non-compliance.

    To settle the matter, US and EU authorities started “peace talks” in spring 2022.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that they are working with the Biden administration on the new agreement that will “enable predictable and trustworthy data flows between the EU and US, safeguarding the privacy and civil liberties.” 

    However, it’s just the beginning of a lengthy negotiation process. The matter is far from being settled and contentious issues remain as we discussed on Twitter (come say hi !).

    For one, the US isn’t eager to modify its surveillance laws and is mostly willing to make them “proportional” to those in place in the EU. These modifications may still not satisfy CJEU — which has the power to block the agreement vetting or invalidate it once again. 

    While these matters are getting hashed out, Google Analytics users, collecting data about EU citizens and/or residents, remain on slippery grounds. As long as they use GA4, they can be subject to GDPR-related lawsuits. 

    To Sum It Up 

    • Google Analytics 4 and Google Universal Analytics are not GDPR compliant because of Privacy Shield invalidation in 2020. 
    • French and Austrian data watchdogs named Google Analytics operations “illegal”. Swedish, Dutch and Norwegian authorities also claim it’s in breach of GDPR. 
    • Any website using GA for collecting data about European citizens and/or residents can be taken to court for GDPR violations (which is already happening). 
    • Privacy Shield 2.0 Framework discussions to regulate EU-US data transfers have only begun and may take years. Even if accepted, the new framework(s) may once again be invalidated by local data regulators as has already happened in the past. 

    Time to Get a GDPR Compliant Google Analytics Alternative 

    Retaining 100% data ownership is the optimal path to GDPR compliance.

    By selecting a transparent web analytics solution that offers 100% data ownership, you can rest assured that no “behind the scenes” data collection, processing or transfers take place. 

    Unlike Google Analytics 4, Matomo offers all of the features you need to be GDPR compliant : 

    • Full data anonymisation 
    • Single-purpose data usage 
    • Easy consent and an opt-out mechanism 
    • First-party cookies usage by default 
    • Simple access to collect data 
    • Fast data removals 
    • EU-based data storage for Matomo Cloud (or storage in the country of your choice with Matomo On-Premise)

    Learn about your audiences in a privacy-centred way and protect your business against unnecessary legal exposure. 

    Start your 21-day free trial (no credit card required) to see how fully GDPR-compliant website analytics works ! 

  • Ffmpeg stream works from cli but not inside bash script, no errors

    21 juillet 2022, par Sidharth Rao

    I'm running an Ffmpeg stream on Ubuntu writing to an rtp address, and it appears to work perfectly from my cli every time but fails to actually write anything from inside a bash script. After running from inside the cli, the bash script works every time I run it for about the next 5 minutes and then starts failing without errors again.

    


    Here is the command :

    


    ffmpeg -i video.mp4 -fflags nobuffer -flags low_delay -s 640x480 -c:v libx264 -profile:v baseline -b:v 2M -r 24 -g 60 -an -rtsp_transport tcp -f rtp rtp://CENSOREDCENSORED:0000


    


    Here is the bash script :

    


    #!/bin/bash

ffmpeg -i video.mp4 -fflags nobuffer -flags low_delay -s 640x480 -c:v libx264 -profile:v baseline -b:v 2M -r 24 -g 60 -an -rtsp_transport tcp -f rtp rtp://CENSOREDCENSORED:0000


    


    And here is the same output to cli for both of them :

    


    ffmpeg version 3.4.11-0ubuntu0.1 Copyright (c) 2000-2022 the FFmpeg developers
  built with gcc 7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04)
  configuration: --prefix=/usr --extra-version=0ubuntu0.1 --toolchain=hardened --libdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu --incdir=/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu --enable-gpl --disable-stripping --enable-avresample --enable-avisynth --enable-gnutls --enable-ladspa --enable-libass --enable-libbluray --enable-libbs2b --enable-libcaca --enable-libcdio --enable-libflite --enable-libfontconfig --enable-libfreetype --enable-libfribidi --enable-libgme --enable-libgsm --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libmysofa --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopenmpt --enable-libopus --enable-libpulse --enable-librubberband --enable-librsvg --enable-libshine --enable-libsnappy --enable-libsoxr --enable-libspeex --enable-libssh --enable-libtheora --enable-libtwolame --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-libwavpack --enable-libwebp --enable-libx265 --enable-libxml2 --enable-libxvid --enable-libzmq --enable-libzvbi --enable-omx --enable-openal --enable-opengl --enable-sdl2 --enable-libdc1394 --enable-libdrm --enable-libiec61883 --enable-chromaprint --enable-frei0r --enable-libopencv --enable-libx264 --enable-shared
  libavutil      55. 78.100 / 55. 78.100
  libavcodec     57.107.100 / 57.107.100
  libavformat    57. 83.100 / 57. 83.100
  libavdevice    57. 10.100 / 57. 10.100
  libavfilter     6.107.100 /  6.107.100
  libavresample   3.  7.  0 /  3.  7.  0
  libswscale      4.  8.100 /  4.  8.100
  libswresample   2.  9.100 /  2.  9.100
  libpostproc    54.  7.100 / 54.  7.100
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'out.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf58.76.100
  Duration: 00:00:26.00, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 227 kb/s
    Stream #0:0(und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p, 640x480, 226 kb/s, 2.31 fps, 2.31 tbr, 18464 tbn, 4.62 tbc (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
Stream mapping:
  Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (h264 (native) -> h264 (libx264))
Press [q] to stop, [?] for help
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX FMA3 BMI2 AVX2
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] profile Constrained Baseline, level 3.0
Output #0, rtp, to 'rtp://us.robotics.cognitedata.com:5005':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf57.83.100
    Stream #0:0(und): Video: h264 (libx264), yuv420p, 640x480, q=-1--1, 2000 kb/s, 24 fps, 90k tbn, 24 tbc (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      encoder         : Lavc57.107.100 libx264
    Side data:
      cpb: bitrate max/min/avg: 0/0/2000000 buffer size: 0 vbv_delay: -1
SDP:
v=0
o=- 0 0 IN IP4 127.0.0.1
s=No Name
c=IN IP4 20.232.153.224
t=0 0
a=tool:libavformat 57.83.100
m=video 5005 RTP/AVP 96
b=AS:2000
a=rtpmap:96 H264/90000
a=fmtp:96 packetization-mode=1

frame=  624 fps=194 q=-1.0 Lsize=    6288kB time=00:00:25.95 bitrate=1984.3kbits/s dup=564 drop=0 speed=8.08x
video:6226kB audio:0kB subtitle:0kB other streams:0kB global headers:0kB muxing overhead: 0.992690%
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] frame I:11    Avg QP: 2.77  size:132437
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] frame P:613   Avg QP: 4.97  size:  8024
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] mb I  I16..4: 20.2%  0.0% 79.8%
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] mb P  I16..4:  0.8%  0.0%  2.0%  P16..4: 12.3%  1.0%  1.2%  0.0%  0.0%    skip:82.6%
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] final ratefactor: 6.07
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] coded y,uvDC,uvAC intra: 87.7% 87.0% 68.2% inter: 8.6% 7.0% 6.6%
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] i16 v,h,dc,p: 34% 15% 41% 10%
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] i4 v,h,dc,ddl,ddr,vr,hd,vl,hu: 43% 24% 13%  3%  3%  3%  4%  3%  4%
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] i8c dc,h,v,p: 36% 22% 37%  6%
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] ref P L0: 97.5%  1.9%  0.6%
[libx264 @ 0x5585318623c0] kb/s:1961.69


    


    The ffmpeg stream also fails from inside of a docker image.

    


  • ffmpeg concat doesn't sync to manual frame by frame concatenation

    5 juillet 2022, par memo

    I have hundreds of short (10-120seconds) videos (H264 mp4) with audio (aac). (let's call these 'clips'). All identical video and audio codecs, resolution, framerate, crf, pixel format, sample rate etc.

    


    concat_demux :

    


    If I concat these with ffmpeg concat (demuxer), I get a single nice H264 mp4 with audio perfectly synced to the video (as expected).

    


    cmd_args = ['ffmpeg',
            '-f concat',
            '-safe 0',
            f'-i "{output_filelist_path}"',
            '-c copy',
            '-y',
            '-r 30', # trying this out of desperation
            f'"{output_concat_demux}"'
            ]

cmd = ' '.join(cmd_args)
r = subprocess.call(cmd, shell=True, cwd=args.output_dir)


    


    frame_by_frame :

    


    However, if I manually iterate every frame of every clip video and write the frames to an mp4 using skvideo.io, this video drifts out of sync with the concat_demux version.

    


    input_dict = { '-r':str(fps) } 
output_dict = { '-r':str(fps), '-pix_fmt':'yuv420p', '-vcodec':'libx264', '-crf':'18' }
video_writer = skvideo.io.FFmpegWriter(output_path, inputdict=input_dict, outputdict=output_dict) 

for video_path in video_paths:
   video = skvideo.io.vread(video_path) # read all frames into np.array
   for frame in video:
      video_writer.writeFrame(frame)
video_writer.close()


    


    When I compare these two files in a video editor (e.g. AfterEffects) and step through frame by frame, I can see that with every new clip, the frame_by_frame version slips 1 or 2 frames ahead of the ffmpeg concat_demux version. What is going on ? How can I fix - or at least debug - this ?

    


    On a side note, I do need to concatenate manually frame by frame, as I'm also doing a ton of other stuff (triggering events on clip change, overlaying additional elements etc). And I need to be able to sync a concatenated audio. I was hoping to concatenate the video manually frame by frame and do my post-processing, and then mux with the audio from the ffmpeg concat_demux version. But alas they drift out of sync.

    



    


    (I've found quite a few posts on SO where the problem is using ffmpeg concat results in videos which are out of sync with the audio. However, this is not my problem. My video created with ffmpeg concat is perfectly in sync with the audio, but it's out of sync with a manually frame-by-frame concatenated video.)

    



    


    Update - concat_protocol

    


    I've tried using the concat protocol. Now the output of this gives a file where the video is frame synced to the frame_by_frame version, BUT the audio is synced to the audio of the concat_demux version. So its audio is out of sync with the video.

    


    intermediate_paths = []
for p in clip_file_list:
    intermediate_path = os.path.join(args.output_dir, 'intermediate', os.path.basename(p) + '.ts')
    intermediate_paths.append(intermediate_path)
    cmd_args = ['ffmpeg',
        f'-i "{p}"',
        '-c copy -bsf:v h264_mp4toannexb -f mpegts -y',
        f'"{intermediate_path}"'
        ]

    cmd = ' '.join(cmd_args)
    r = subprocess.call(cmd, shell=True, cwd=args.output_dir)


intermediate_paths = '|'.join(intermediate_paths)
cmd_args = ['ffmpeg',
            f'-i "concat:{intermediate_paths}"',
            '-c copy -bsf:a aac_adtstoasc',
            f'"{output_concat_path}"'
            ]

cmd = ' '.join(cmd_args)
r = subprocess.call(cmd, shell=True, cwd=args.output_dir)


    


    I am getting loads of errors like below

    


        corrupt input packet in stream 0
[mp4 @ 0x137e043d0] Non-monotonous DTS in output stream 0:1; previous: 83027966, current: 83027198; changing to 83027967. This may result in incorrect timestamps in the output file.


    



    


    here's the info on the two output files. Input #0 is the ffmpeg concat_demux. Input #1 is the manual frame-by-frame. Note the concat.mp4 has a framerate of 29.94 fps. I'm not sure if this is the problem. I couldn't figure out how to make this 30 (see '-r 30' in the ffmpeg concat command above)

    


    ffmpeg version 5.0.1 Copyright (c) 2000-2022 the FFmpeg developers
  built with Apple clang version 13.1.6 (clang-1316.0.21.2.5)
  configuration: --prefix=/opt/homebrew/Cellar/ffmpeg/5.0.1_2 --enable-shared --enable-pthreads --enable-version3 --cc=clang --host-cflags= --host-ldflags= --enable-ffplay --enable-gnutls --enable-gpl --enable-libaom --enable-libbluray --enable-libdav1d --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopus --enable-librav1e --enable-librist --enable-librubberband --enable-libsnappy --enable-libsrt --enable-libtesseract --enable-libtheora --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvmaf --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-libwebp --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 --enable-libxml2 --enable-libxvid --enable-lzma --enable-libfontconfig --enable-libfreetype --enable-frei0r --enable-libass --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libspeex --enable-libsoxr --enable-libzmq --enable-libzimg --disable-libjack --disable-indev=jack --enable-videotoolbox --enable-neon
  libavutil      57. 17.100 / 57. 17.100
  libavcodec     59. 18.100 / 59. 18.100
  libavformat    59. 16.100 / 59. 16.100
  libavdevice    59.  4.100 / 59.  4.100
  libavfilter     8. 24.100 /  8. 24.100
  libswscale      6.  4.100 /  6.  4.100
  libswresample   4.  3.100 /  4.  3.100
  libpostproc    56.  3.100 / 56.  3.100
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clips_concat.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf59.16.100
  Duration: 00:01:43.22, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 5412 kb/s
  Stream #0:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], 5276 kb/s, 29.94 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
  Stream #0:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 128 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : SoundHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
Input #1, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clips_frames.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf59.16.100
  Duration: 00:01:43.00, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 4917 kb/s
  Stream #1:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080, 4914 kb/s, 30 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]


    



    


    here's info on first few clips (the manual concat is already 2 frames out of sync with the ffmpeg concat version by the second clip !)

    


    ffmpeg version 5.0.1 Copyright (c) 2000-2022 the FFmpeg developers
  built with Apple clang version 13.1.6 (clang-1316.0.21.2.5)
  configuration: --prefix=/opt/homebrew/Cellar/ffmpeg/5.0.1_2 --enable-shared --enable-pthreads --enable-version3 --cc=clang --host-cflags= --host-ldflags= --enable-ffplay --enable-gnutls --enable-gpl --enable-libaom --enable-libbluray --enable-libdav1d --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopus --enable-librav1e --enable-librist --enable-librubberband --enable-libsnappy --enable-libsrt --enable-libtesseract --enable-libtheora --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvmaf --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-libwebp --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 --enable-libxml2 --enable-libxvid --enable-lzma --enable-libfontconfig --enable-libfreetype --enable-frei0r --enable-libass --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libspeex --enable-libsoxr --enable-libzmq --enable-libzimg --disable-libjack --disable-indev=jack --enable-videotoolbox --enable-neon
  libavutil      57. 17.100 / 57. 17.100
  libavcodec     59. 18.100 / 59. 18.100
  libavformat    59. 16.100 / 59. 16.100
  libavdevice    59.  4.100 / 59.  4.100
  libavfilter     8. 24.100 /  8. 24.100
  libswscale      6.  4.100 /  6.  4.100
  libswresample   4.  3.100 /  4.  3.100
  libpostproc    56.  3.100 / 56.  3.100
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clip_1080px_0.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf58.29.100
  Duration: 00:00:05.02, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 3944 kb/s
  Stream #0:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], 3818 kb/s, 30 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
  Stream #0:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 131 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : SoundHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
Input #1, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clip_1080px_1.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf58.29.100
  Duration: 00:00:05.02, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 4557 kb/s
  Stream #1:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], 4438 kb/s, 30 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
  Stream #1:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 128 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : SoundHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
Input #2, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clip_1080px_2.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf58.29.100
  Duration: 00:00:11.02, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 5447 kb/s
  Stream #2:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], 5320 kb/s, 30 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
  Stream #2:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 128 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : SoundHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
Input #3, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clip_1080px_3.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf58.29.100
  Duration: 00:00:11.02, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 5978 kb/s
  Stream #3:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], 5851 kb/s, 30 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
  Stream #3:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 128 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : SoundHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
Input #4, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clip_1080px_4.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf58.29.100
  Duration: 00:00:16.02, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 6570 kb/s
  Stream #4:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], 6441 kb/s, 30 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
  Stream #4:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 128 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : SoundHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
Input #5, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clip_1080px_5.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf58.29.100
  Duration: 00:00:13.02, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 5069 kb/s
  Stream #5:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], 4940 kb/s, 30 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
  Stream #5:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 128 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : SoundHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
Input #6, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clip_1080px_6.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf58.29.100
  Duration: 00:00:22.02, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 4775 kb/s
  Stream #6:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], 4642 kb/s, 30 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
  Stream #6:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 128 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : SoundHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
Input #7, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'clip_1080px_7.mp4':
  Metadata:
    major_brand     : isom
    minor_version   : 512
    compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
    encoder         : Lavf58.29.100
  Duration: 00:00:22.02, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 5402 kb/s
  Stream #7:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1080x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], 5269 kb/s, 30 fps, 30 tbr, 15360 tbn (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : VideoHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]
  Stream #7:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, stereo, fltp, 128 kb/s (default)
    Metadata:
      handler_name    : SoundHandler
      vendor_id       : [0][0][0][0]