Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (7439)

• RoQ on Dreamcast

  18 mars 2011, par Multimedia Mike — Sega Dreamcast

  I have been working on that challenge to play back video on the Sega Dreamcast. To review, I asserted that the RoQ format would be a good fit for the Sega Dreamcast hardware. The goal was to play 640x480 video at 30 frames/second. Short version : I have determined that it is possible to decode such video in real time. However, I ran into certain data rate caveats.

  First off : Have you ever wondered if the Dreamcast can read an 80mm optical disc ? It can ! I discovered this when I only had 60 MB of RoQ samples to burn on a disc and a spindle full of these 210MB-capacity 80mm CD-Rs that I never have occasion to use.

  
  
  

  New RoQ Library
  There are open source RoQ decoders out there but I decided to write a new one. A few reasons : 1) RoQ is so simple that I didn’t think it would take too long ; 2) it would be nice to have a RoQ library that is license-compatible (BSD-like) with the rest of the KallistiOS distribution ; 3) the idroq.tar.gz distribution, while license-compatible, has enough issues that I didn’t want to correct it.

  Thankfully, I was correct about the task not being too difficult : I put together a new RoQ decoder in short order. I’m a bit embarrassed to admit that the part I had the most trouble with was properly converting YUV -> RGB.
  
  About the approach I took : While the original idroq.tar.gz decoder maintains YUV 4:2:0 codebooks (which led to chroma bugs during motion compensation) and FFmpeg’s decoder maintains YUV 4:4:4 codebooks, this decoder is built to convert the YUV 4:2:0 vectors into RGB565 vectors during the vector unpacking phase. Thus, the entire frame is rendered in RGB565 — no lengthy YUV -> RGB conversion after decoding — and all pixels are shuffled around as 16-bit units (minor speedup vs. shuffling everything as bytes).

  I also entertained the idea of maintaining YUYV codebooks (since the DC supports that colorspace as a texture format). But I scrapped that idea when I remembered it would lead to the same chroma bleeding problem seen in the original idroq.tar.gz decoder.

  Onto The Dreamcast
  I developed the library on a Linux computer, allowing it to output a series of PNM files for visual verification and debugging. Dropping it into a basic DC/KOS-compatible program was trivial and the first order of business was profiling.

  At first, I profiled the entire decode operation : open file, then read and decode each chunk while tossing away the results. I was roundly disappointed to see that, e.g., an 8.5-second RoQ sample needed a little more than 20 seconds to complete. Not real time. I performed a series of optimizations on the decoding library that netted notable performance gains when profiling on Linux. When I brought these same optimizations over to the DC, decoding time didn’t improve at all. This was my first suspicion that perhaps my assumptions regarding the DC’s optical drive’s data rate were not correct.

  Dreamcast Data Rate Profiling
  Let’s start with some definitions : In terms of data rate, an ’X’, i.e., 1X is the minimum data rate needed to read CD quality audio from a disc. At that speed, a drive should be able to stream 75 sectors each second. When reading mode 1/form 1 CD-ROM data, each sector has 2048 bytes (2 kbytes), so a single-speed data rate should achieve 150 kbytes/sec.

  The Dreamcast is supposed to possess a 12X optical drive. This would imply a maximum data rate of 150 kbytes/sec * 12 = 1800 kbytes/sec.

  Rigging up a trivial experiment using the RoQ samples burned on a few different CD-R discs, the best data rate I can see is about 500-525 kbytes/sec, or around 3.5X.

  Where’s the discrepancy ? My first theory has to do with the fact that not all optical media is created equal. This is why optical drives often advertise a slew of numbers which refer to the best theoretical speed for reading a CD vs. writing a CD-R vs. writing a CD-RW, etc. Perhaps the DC drive can’t read CD-Rs very quickly. To test this theory, I tried streaming a large file from a conventionally mastered CD-ROM. This worked well for the closest CD-ROM I had on hand : I was able to stream data at a rate that works out to about 6.5X.

  I smell a science project for another evening : Profiling read speeds from a mastered CD-ROM, burned CD-R, and also a mastered GD-ROM, on each of the 3 Dreamcast consoles I possess (I’ve heard that there’s variance between optical drives depending on manufacturing run).

  The Good News
  I added a little finer-grained code to profile just the video decoding functions. The good news is that the decoder meets my real time goals : That 8.5-second RoQ sample encoded at 640x480x30fps makes its way through the video decoding functions on the DC in a little less than 5 seconds. If the optical drive can supply the data fast enough, the video decoder can take care of the rest.

  The RoQ encoder included with FFmpeg does not honor any bitrate parameters. Instead, I encoded the same file at 320x240. It reportedly decoded in real time and can be streamed in real time as well.

  I say "reportedly" because I’m simply working from textual output at this point ; the next phase is to hook the decoder up to the display hardware.

• Use Google Analytics and risk fines, after CJEU ruling on Privacy Shield

  27 août 2020, par Joselyn Khor — Privacy
  EU websites using Google Analytics and Facebook are being targeted by European privacy group noyb after the invalidation of the Privacy Shield. They filed a complaint against 101 websites for continuing to send data to the US. 

  “A quick analysis of the HTML source code of major EU webpages shows that many companies still use Google Analytics or Facebook Connect one month after a major judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) - despite both companies clearly falling under US surveillance laws, such as FISA 702. Neither Facebook nor Google seem to have a legal basis for the data transfers.”

  

  The Privacy Shield previously allowed for EU data to be transferred to the US. However, this was invalidated by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on July 16, 2020. The CJEU deemed it illegal for any websites to transfer the personal data of European citizens to the US. 

  They also made it clear in a press release that “data subjects can claim compensation for inadmissible data exports (marginal no. 143 of the judgment). This should in particular include non-material damage (“compensation for pain and suffering”) and must be of a deterrent amount under European law.” Which puts extra financial pressure on websites to take the new ruling seriously.

  Immediate action is required after Google Privacy Shield invalidation

  The Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information therefore calls on all those responsible under its supervision to observe the decision of the ECJ [CJEU]. Those responsible who transfer personal data to the USA - especially when using cloud services - are now required to immediately switch to service providers in the European Union or in a country with an adequate level of data protection.

  As the ruling is effective immediately, there’s a pressing need for websites using Google Analytics to act, or face getting fined.

  What does this mean for you ?

  If you’re using Google Analytics the safest bet is to stop using it immediately. 

  "Neither Google Analytics nor Facebook Connect are necessary for the operation of these websites and could therefore have been replaced or at least deactivated in the meantime."

  If you still need to use it, then you’ll need to inform your visitors via a clear consent screen. This banner needs to make clear their personal data will be sent to the US, and to educate them about any potential risk related to this. They will then need to explicitly agree to this. 

  Another downside of cookie consent screens is that you may also suffer a damaging loss of visitors. After implementing cookie consent best practices, the UK’s data regulator the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) found a 90% drop in traffic, “implying a ninety percent drop in opt-in rates.”

  With an acceptance rate for such consent screens being lower than 10% your analytics becomes guesswork rather than science. 

  Looking for a privacy-respecting alternative to Google Analytics ?

  Privacy compliant Matomo Analytics is one of the best Google Analytics alternatives availalble. 

  With Matomo you’re able to continue using analytics without facing the wrath of both the GDPR and the CJEU. Matomo On-Premise lets you choose where your data is stored, so you can ensure no data is processed in the US. 

  Matomo is privacy-friendly and can be tweaked to comply with all privacy laws. Including the GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA and PECR. The benefits of this include : not needing to use tracking or cookie consent screens (like with GA) ; and avoiding fines because no personal data is collected. You also get 100% accurate data and the ability to protect your user’s privacy.

  Download Matomo

  

  Is your EU business at risk of being fined for using Google Analytics ?

  Email

  Get our assessment guide

• Decoding VP8 On A Sega Dreamcast

  20 février 2011, par Multimedia Mike — Sega Dreamcast, VP8

  I got Google’s libvpx VP8 codec library to compile and run on the Sega Dreamcast with its Hitachi/Renesas SH-4 200 MHz CPU. So give Google/On2 their due credit for writing portable software. I’m not sure how best to illustrate this so please accept this still photo depicting my testbench Dreamcast console driving video to my monitor :

  
  
  

  Why ? Because I wanted to try my hand at porting some existing software to this console and because I tend to be most comfortable working with assorted multimedia software components. This seemed like it would be a good exercise.

  You may have observed that the video is blue. Shortest, simplest answer : Pure laziness. Short, technical answer : Path of least resistance for getting through this exercise. Longer answer follows.

  Update : I did eventually realize that the Dreamcast can work with YUV textures. Read more in my followup post.

  Process and Pitfalls
  libvpx comes with a number of little utilities including decode_to_md5.c. The first order of business was porting over enough source files to make the VP8 decoder compile along with the MD5 testbench utility.

  Again, I used the KallistiOS (KOS) console RTOS (aside : I’m still working to get modern Linux kernels compiled for the Dreamcast). I started by configuring and compiling libvpx on a regular desktop Linux system. From there, I was able to modify a number of configuration options to make the build more amenable to the embedded RTOS.
  
  I had to create a few shim header files that mapped various functions related to threading and synchronization to their KOS equivalents. For example, KOS has a threading library cleverly named kthreads which is mostly compatible with the more common pthread library functions. KOS apparently also predates stdint.h, so I had to contrive a file with those basic types.

  So I got everything compiled and then uploaded the binary along with a small VP8 IVF test vector. Imagine my surprise when an MD5 sum came out of the serial console. Further, visualize my utter speechlessness when I noticed that the MD5 sum matched what my desktop platform produced. It worked !

  Almost. When I tried to decode all frames in a test vector, the program would invariably crash. The problem was that the file that manages motion compensation (reconinter.c) needs to define MUST_BE_ALIGNED which compiles byte-wise block copy functions. This is necessary for CPUs like the SH-4 which can’t load unaligned data. Apparently, even ARM CPUs these days can handle unaligned memory accesses which is why this isn’t a configure-time option.

  Showing The Work
  I completed the first testbench application which ran the MD5 test on all 17 official IVF test vectors. The SH-4/Dreamcast version aces the whole suite.

  However, this is a video game console, so I had better be able to show the decoded video. The Dreamcast is strictly RGB— forget about displaying YUV data directly. I could take the performance hit to convert YUV -> RGB. Or, I could just display the intensity information (Y plane) rendered on a random color scale (I chose blue) on an RGB565 texture (the DC’s graphics hardware can also do paletted textures but those need to be rearranged/twiddled/swizzled).

  Results
  So, can the Dreamcast decode VP8 video in realtime ? Sure ! Well, I really need to qualify. In the test depicted in the picture, it seems to be realtime (though I wasn’t enforcing proper frame timings, just decoding and displaying as quickly as possible). Obviously, I wasn’t bothering to properly convert YUV -> RGB. Plus, that Big Buck Bunny test vector clip is only 176x144. Obviously, no audio decoding either.

  So, realtime playback, with a little fine print.

  On the plus side, it’s trivial to get the Dreamcast video hardware to upscale that little blue image to fullscreen.

  I was able to tally the total milliseconds’ worth of wall clock time required to decode the 17 VP8 test vectors. As you can probably work out from this list, when I try to play a 320x240 video, things start to break down.

  1. Processed 29 176x144 frames in 987 milliseconds.
  2. Processed 49 176x144 frames in 1809 milliseconds.
  3. Processed 49 176x144 frames in 704 milliseconds.
  4. Processed 29 176x144 frames in 255 milliseconds.
  5. Processed 49 176x144 frames in 339 milliseconds.
  6. Processed 48 175x143 frames in 2446 milliseconds.
  7. Processed 29 176x144 frames in 432 milliseconds.
  8. Processed 2 1432x888 frames in 2060 milliseconds.
  9. Processed 49 176x144 frames in 1884 milliseconds.
  10. Processed 57 320x240 frames in 5792 milliseconds.
  11. Processed 29 176x144 frames in 989 milliseconds.
  12. Processed 29 176x144 frames in 740 milliseconds.
  13. Processed 29 176x144 frames in 839 milliseconds.
  14. Processed 49 175x143 frames in 2849 milliseconds.
  15. Processed 260 320x240 frames in 29719 milliseconds.
  16. Processed 29 176x144 frames in 962 milliseconds.
  17. Processed 29 176x144 frames in 933 milliseconds.