Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (98)

  • MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version

    25 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
    The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
    To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
    If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...)

  • Des sites réalisés avec MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    Cette page présente quelques-uns des sites fonctionnant sous MediaSPIP.
    Vous pouvez bien entendu ajouter le votre grâce au formulaire en bas de page.

  • ANNEXE : Les plugins utilisés spécifiquement pour la ferme

    5 mars 2010, par

    Le site central/maître de la ferme a besoin d’utiliser plusieurs plugins supplémentaires vis à vis des canaux pour son bon fonctionnement. le plugin Gestion de la mutualisation ; le plugin inscription3 pour gérer les inscriptions et les demandes de création d’instance de mutualisation dès l’inscription des utilisateurs ; le plugin verifier qui fournit une API de vérification des champs (utilisé par inscription3) ; le plugin champs extras v2 nécessité par inscription3 (...)

Sur d’autres sites (13991)

  • Electron, Chromium and ffmpeg licencing confusion [closed]

    12 mars 2021, par Iamisti

    Intro :
Recently I'm working on an electron based application that is free to use but also has subscription based services.
It came to my attention that ffmpeg is shipped with electron, which has GPL/LGPL licence.

    


    My quetion is :

    


      

    • Am I legally able to still distribute the application and be licence-compliant with ffmpeg without owning any proper licence to it ? I thought chromium dealt with the licencing on this topic since so many applications nowadays are shipped with using electron and chromium under the hood.
    • 


    • How do I compile/build electron to make it licence compatible (in case its not ?)
    • 


    


    I did a lot of reseearch and I found out the followings :

    


      

    • ffmpeg is shipped with chromium, they built their own version of ffmpeg and it seems they also have licence for it. Although that might be that they just push the responsibility down on the software developer/company who distributes their application with chromium.
Chromium licence for ffmpeg : https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/third_party/ffmpeg/+/703e920bb75053bf6b87d41d198cbbfbce3fb7ad/LICENSE

      


    • 


    • Apparently ffmpeg has a checklist of how to be licence compliant. Does that mean if I do all these steps, I can still distribute the application and can legally use it ? Licence checklist for ffmpeg : http://ffmpeg.org/legal.html

      


    • 


    • checking out some popular electron applications like Discord, Figma, Slack, etc... they ALL have ffmpeg included cause of electron when you install them. I wonder how they made it legal ? I don't see any of these checklists done on any of these popular applications.

      


    • 


    


    I'm know very little regarding licences, so any help would be incredibly huge help for me.

    


  • What is video_track_timescale in ffmpeg ? [duplicate]

    12 mai 2019, par Sasidharan S

    This question already has an answer here :

    Can some one explain what is exact meaning of video_track_timescale ?

    And how the value of video_track_timescale is fixed ?

    For example I saw some configuration with -video_track_timescale 1000 may I know why and how 1000 is used ?

  • avcodec/h264_ps : Return error if pps has FMO parameters

    13 février 2020, par Andriy Gelman
    avcodec/h264_ps : Return error if pps has FMO parameters
    

    FMO is not supported and fields related to FMO are not parsed, meaning
    that any fields which follow will be corrupt.

    Signed-off-by : James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>

    • [DH] libavcodec/h264_ps.c