Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (8129)

• Revision 8c16dee4f2 : Merge "Remove "eobs" array in MACROBLOCKD." into experimental

  21 février 2013, par Ronald S. Bultje

  Merge "Remove "eobs" array in MACROBLOCKD." into experimental

• NDK r8c warning for asm objects regarding "Cortex-A8 erratum" - should I be worried ?

  7 décembre 2012, par Alex Cohn

  Question : What is the meaning of this warning ? If there are no real-life consequences, I can live with it for a while... But I am concerned with what will happen if our program gets loaded on one of the faulty chips.

  Background : With NDK r8c, linking of X264 encoder issues warnings :

  cannot scan executable section 1 of libx264.a(dct-a.o) for Cortex-A8 erratum because it has no mapping symbols

  ... same warning for all assembly files in libx264.

  libx264.a itself was cross-compiled on the same machine with the same 4.6 toolchain taken from NDK.

  Here are the instructions to easily reproduce the problem (Ubuntu or MacOS) :

  1. Download x264-snapshot-20121203-2245 from ftp://ftp.videolan.org/pub/x264/snapshots/last_x264.tar.bz2

  2. Run ./configure --enable-pic --enable-strip --enable-static --cross-prefix=~/android-ndk-r8c/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.6/prebuilt/linux-x86/bin/arm-linux-androideabi- --sysroot=~/android-ndk-r8c/platforms/android-14/arch-arm --host=arm-linux

  3. Run ~/android-ndk-r8c/prebuilt/linux-x86/bin/make

  It will build the static library, and after that display the Cortex-A8 warning while linking the x265 executable. I am not worried about the compiler warnings, because building libx264.a is done offline, it is not part of our official daily build.

  I have reported this as http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=40794.

  I tried to add the mapping symbols manually to dct-a.S following the ARM.com instructions, but this had no effect.

• Can you "stream" images to ffmpeg to construct a video, instead of saving them to disk ?

  8 juillet 2016, par Brandon

  My work recently involves programmatically making videos. In python, the typical workflow looks something like this :

  import subprocess, Image, ImageDraw
  
  
  
  for i in range(frames_per_second * video_duration_seconds):
  
      img = createFrame(i)
  
      img.save("%07d.png" % i)
  
  
  
  subprocess.call(["ffmpeg","-y","-r",str(frames_per_second),"-i", "%07d.png","-vcodec","mpeg4", "-qscale","5", "-r", str(frames_per_second), "video.avi"])

  This workflow creates an image for each frame in the video and saves it to disk. After all images have been saved, ffmpeg is called to construct a video from all of the images.

  Saving the images to disk (not the creation of the images in memory) consumes the majority of the cycles here, and does not appear to be necessary. Is there some way to perform the same function, but without saving the images to disk ? So, ffmpeg would be called and the images would be constructed and fed to ffmpeg immediately after being constructed.