Recherche avancée
Autres articles (53)
-
Gestion générale des documents
13 mai 2011, parMédiaSPIP ne modifie jamais le document original mis en ligne.
Pour chaque document mis en ligne il effectue deux opérations successives : la création d’une version supplémentaire qui peut être facilement consultée en ligne tout en laissant l’original téléchargeable dans le cas où le document original ne peut être lu dans un navigateur Internet ; la récupération des métadonnées du document original pour illustrer textuellement le fichier ;
Les tableaux ci-dessous expliquent ce que peut faire MédiaSPIP (...) -
Des sites réalisés avec MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parCette page présente quelques-uns des sites fonctionnant sous MediaSPIP.
Vous pouvez bien entendu ajouter le votre grâce au formulaire en bas de page. -
ANNEXE : Les extensions, plugins SPIP des canaux
11 février 2010, parUn plugin est un ajout fonctionnel au noyau principal de SPIP. MediaSPIP consiste en un choix délibéré de plugins existant ou pas auparavant dans la communauté SPIP, qui ont pour certains nécessité soit leur création de A à Z, soit des ajouts de fonctionnalités.
Les extensions que MediaSPIP nécessite pour fonctionner
Depuis la version 2.1.0, SPIP permet d’ajouter des plugins dans le répertoire extensions/.
Les "extensions" ne sont ni plus ni moins que des plugins dont la particularité est qu’ils se (...)
Sur d’autres sites (5772)
-
x264 library speed - Altivec vs SSE2 -
25 février 2013, par Omer MerdanI have simple cheap dualcore intel-3ghz-debian and access to super-expensive powerPc7-Aix.
And after few days of strugle, i compiled libx264 and tested it on both computers :
- GCC : library x264 on intel (with SSE2 capabilities) and
- GCC on 16 core powerPc (with altivec).
... and result is that cheap intel is x2 times faster ! (with altivec disabled, intel is 10x times faster)
My question : is this normal ?
Does all other powerPC-users have same results ? Can powerPc-altivec-optimisation of x264 library work at same speed with intel... or MMX/SSE optimisation is officially at least 2 times faster for this library ?I am not interested in multi-thread options. Number of cores and threads are irrelevant. Just simple one-thread x264 encoding with default "medium preset" using rawvideo as source, sse vs altivec.
Maybe native Aix XLC compiler provide better results ? (i managed only gcc to work)
... mac-powerpc-users maybe know something about this.
powrPc7-Aix:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: 64-bit XCOFF
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: Altivec
time: real 0m33.559s
---
intelDebian:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: ELF 32-bit LSB executable
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
time: real 0m16.503s -
x264 library speed - Altivec vs SSE4 -
15 août 2015, par Asain KujovicI have simple cheap dualcore intel-3ghz-debian and access to super-expensive powerPc7-Aix.
And after few days of strugle, i compiled libx264 and tested it on both computers :
- GCC : library x264 on intel (with SSE2 capabilities) and
- GCC on 16 core powerPc (with altivec).
... and result is that cheap intel is x2 times faster ! (with altivec disabled, intel is 10x times faster)
My question : is this normal ?
Does all other powerPC-users have same results ? Can powerPc-altivec-optimisation of x264 library work at same speed with intel... or MMX/SSE optimisation is officially at least 2 times faster for this library ?I am not interested in multi-thread options. Number of cores and threads are irrelevant. Just simple one-thread x264 encoding with default "medium preset" using rawvideo as source, sse vs altivec.
Maybe native Aix XLC compiler provide better results ? (i managed only gcc to work)
... mac-powerpc-users maybe know something about this.
powrPc7-Aix:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: 64-bit XCOFF
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: Altivec
time: real 0m33.559s
---
intelDebian:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: ELF 32-bit LSB executable
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
time: real 0m16.503s -
x264 library speed - Altivec vs SSE4 -
15 août 2015, par Asain KujovicI have simple cheap dualcore intel-3ghz-debian and access to super-expensive powerPc7-Aix.
And after few days of strugle, i compiled libx264 and tested it on both computers :
- GCC : library x264 on intel (with SSE2 capabilities) and
- GCC on 16 core powerPc (with altivec).
... and result is that cheap intel is x2 times faster ! (with altivec disabled, intel is 10x times faster)
My question : is this normal ?
Does all other powerPC-users have same results ? Can powerPc-altivec-optimisation of x264 library work at same speed with intel... or MMX/SSE optimisation is officially at least 2 times faster for this library ?I am not interested in multi-thread options. Number of cores and threads are irrelevant. Just simple one-thread x264 encoding with default "medium preset" using rawvideo as source, sse vs altivec.
Maybe native Aix XLC compiler provide better results ? (i managed only gcc to work)
... mac-powerpc-users maybe know something about this.
powrPc7-Aix:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: 64-bit XCOFF
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: Altivec
time: real 0m33.559s
---
intelDebian:$ time (cat raw10sec.y4m |x264 --input-res 720x576 --fps 50 -o /dev/null -)
x264: ELF 32-bit LSB executable
x264 [info]: using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 FastShuffle SSE4.1 Cache64
time: real 0m16.503s
Syndiquer tout le site
