
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Bug de détection d’ogg
22 mars 2013, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : français
Type : Video
Autres articles (89)
-
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...) -
Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins
27 avril 2010, parMediaspip core
autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs -
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir
Sur d’autres sites (6461)
-
EC2 for video-encoding
24 septembre 2012, par TK KocheranI have a potential job which will require me to do some video encoding with FFMPEG and x264. I'll have a series of files which I'll need to encode once, then I'll be able to bring down the instances. Since I'm not really sure of the resource utilization of x264 and FFMPEG, what kind of instances should I get ? I'm thinking either a
High-CPU Extra Large Instance
7 GB of memory
20 EC2 Compute Units (8 virtual cores with 2.5 EC2 Compute Units each)
1690 GB of instance storage
64-bit platform
I/O Performance : High
API name : c1.xlargeor, alternatively a
Cluster GPU Quadruple Extra Large Instance
22 GB of memory
33.5 EC2 Compute Units (2 x Intel Xeon X5570, quad-core “Nehalem” architecture)
2 x NVIDIA Tesla “Fermi” M2050 GPUs
1690 GB of instance storage
64-bit platform
I/O Performance : Very High (10 Gigabit Ethernet)
API name : cg1.4xlargeWhat should I use ? Does x264/FFMPEG perform better with faster/more CPUs or does it really pound the GPU more ? In any case, it seems that the Cluster GPU seems to be the higher performance instance. What should I prefer ?
-
EC2 for video-encoding
24 septembre 2012, par TK KocheranI have a potential job which will require me to do some video encoding with FFMPEG and x264. I'll have a series of files which I'll need to encode once, then I'll be able to bring down the instances. Since I'm not really sure of the resource utilization of x264 and FFMPEG, what kind of instances should I get ? I'm thinking either a
High-CPU Extra Large Instance
7 GB of memory
20 EC2 Compute Units (8 virtual cores with 2.5 EC2 Compute Units each)
1690 GB of instance storage
64-bit platform
I/O Performance : High
API name : c1.xlargeor, alternatively a
Cluster GPU Quadruple Extra Large Instance
22 GB of memory
33.5 EC2 Compute Units (2 x Intel Xeon X5570, quad-core “Nehalem” architecture)
2 x NVIDIA Tesla “Fermi” M2050 GPUs
1690 GB of instance storage
64-bit platform
I/O Performance : Very High (10 Gigabit Ethernet)
API name : cg1.4xlargeWhat should I use ? Does x264/FFMPEG perform better with faster/more CPUs or does it really pound the GPU more ? In any case, it seems that the Cluster GPU seems to be the higher performance instance. What should I prefer ?
-
Resize video using FFmpeg C API
28 février 2012, par cr_azI am trying to resize video file on Android device using FFmpeg. Remark : I cant use FFmpeg as binary - in my case it should be used as shared library (only FFmpeg C API is accessible).
I did not find any documentation regarding video resizing, however it looks like algorithm is following :
10 OPEN video_stream FROM video.mp4
20 READ packet FROM video_stream INTO frame
30 IF frame NOT COMPLETE GOTO 20
40 RESIZE frame
50 WRITE frame TO converted_video.mp4
60 GOTO 20Should I use sws_scale function in order to resize frame ? Is there any other (easier ?) way to resize video file using FFmpeg C API ?