Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (6233)

• FFmpeg CRF control using x264 vs libvpx-vp9

  19 octobre 2016, par igon

  I have some experience using ffmpeg with x264 and I wanted to do a comparison with libvpx-vp9. I tested a simple single pass encoding of a raw video, varying the crf settings and presets both with x264 and libvpx-vp9. I am new to libvpx and I followed this and this carefully but I might have still specified wrong combination of parameters since the results I get do not make much sense to me.

  For x264 I did :

  ffmpeg -i test_video.y4m -c:v libx264 -threads 1 -crf <crf> -preset <preset> -y output.mkv 
  
  </preset></crf>

  and obtained the following results :

  codec  , settings                        , time        , PSNR      ,bitrate
  
  libx264,['-crf', '20', '-preset', 'fast'],13.1897280216, 42.938337 ,15728
  
  libx264,['-crf', '20', '-preset', 'medium'],16.80494689, 42.879753 ,15287
  
  libx264,['-crf', '20', '-preset', 'slow'],25.1142120361, 42.919206 ,15400
  
  libx264,['-crf', '30', '-preset', 'fast'],8.79047083855, 37.975141 ,4106
  
  libx264,['-crf', '30', '-preset', 'medium'],9.936599016, 37.713778 ,3749
  
  libx264,['-crf', '30', '-preset', 'slow'],13.0959510803, 37.569511 ,3555

  This makes sense to me, given a crf value you get a value of PSNR and changing the preset can decrease the bitrate but increase the time to encode.

  For libvpx-vp9 I did :

  ffmpeg -i test_video.y4m -c:v libvpx-vp9 -threads 1 -crf <crf> -cpu-used <effort> -y output.mkv 
  
  </effort></crf>

  First of all I thought from tutorials online that the -cpu-used option is equivalent to -preset in x264. Is that correct ? If so what is the difference with -quality ? Furthermore since the range goes from -8 to 8 I assumed that negative values where the fast options while positive values the slowest. Results I get are very confusing though :

  codec     , settings                      , time        , PSNR     ,bitrate
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-cpu-used', '-2'],19.6644911766,32.54317,571
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-cpu-used', '0'],176.670887947,32.69899,564
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-cpu-used', '2'],20.0206270218,32.54317,571
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-cpu-used', '-2'],19.7931578159,32.54317,571
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-cpu-used', '0'],176.587754965,32.69899,564
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-cpu-used', '2'],19.8394429684,32.54317,571

  Bitrate is very low and PSNR seems unaffected by the crf setting (and very low compared to x264). The -cpu-used setting has very minimal impact and also seems that -2 and 2 are the same option.. What am I missing ? I expected libvpx to take more time to encode (which is definitely true) but at the same time higher quality transcodes. What parameters should I use to
  have a fair comparison with x264 ?

  Edit : Thanks to @mulvya and this doc I figured that to work in crf mode with libvpx I have to add -b:v 0. I re-ran my tests and I get :

      codec     , settings                                 , time        , PSNR     ,bitrate
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '-2'],57.6835780144,45.111158,17908
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '0'] ,401.360313892,45.285367,17431
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '2'] ,57.4941239357,45.111158,17908
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '-2'],49.175855875,42.588178,11085
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '0'] ,347.158324957,42.782194,10935
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '2'] ,49.1892938614,42.588178,11085

  PSNR and bitrate went up significantly by adding -b:v 0

• FFmpeg CRF control using x264 vs libvpx-vp9

  19 octobre 2016, par igon

  I have some experience using ffmpeg with x264 and I wanted to do a comparison with libvpx-vp9. I tested a simple single pass encoding of a raw video, varying the crf settings and presets both with x264 and libvpx-vp9. I am new to libvpx and I followed this and this carefully but I might have still specified wrong combination of parameters since the results I get do not make much sense to me.

  For x264 I did :

  ffmpeg -i test_video.y4m -c:v libx264 -threads 1 -crf <crf> -preset <preset> -y output.mkv 
  
  </preset></crf>

  and obtained the following results :

  codec  , settings                        , time        , PSNR      ,bitrate
  
  libx264,['-crf', '20', '-preset', 'fast'],13.1897280216, 42.938337 ,15728
  
  libx264,['-crf', '20', '-preset', 'medium'],16.80494689, 42.879753 ,15287
  
  libx264,['-crf', '20', '-preset', 'slow'],25.1142120361, 42.919206 ,15400
  
  libx264,['-crf', '30', '-preset', 'fast'],8.79047083855, 37.975141 ,4106
  
  libx264,['-crf', '30', '-preset', 'medium'],9.936599016, 37.713778 ,3749
  
  libx264,['-crf', '30', '-preset', 'slow'],13.0959510803, 37.569511 ,3555

  This makes sense to me, given a crf value you get a value of PSNR and changing the preset can decrease the bitrate but increase the time to encode.

  For libvpx-vp9 I did :

  ffmpeg -i test_video.y4m -c:v libvpx-vp9 -threads 1 -crf <crf> -cpu-used <effort> -y output.mkv 
  
  </effort></crf>

  First of all I thought from tutorials online that the -cpu-used option is equivalent to -preset in x264. Is that correct ? If so what is the difference with -quality ? Furthermore since the range goes from -8 to 8 I assumed that negative values where the fast options while positive values the slowest. Results I get are very confusing though :

  codec     , settings                      , time        , PSNR     ,bitrate
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-cpu-used', '-2'],19.6644911766,32.54317,571
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-cpu-used', '0'],176.670887947,32.69899,564
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-cpu-used', '2'],20.0206270218,32.54317,571
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-cpu-used', '-2'],19.7931578159,32.54317,571
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-cpu-used', '0'],176.587754965,32.69899,564
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-cpu-used', '2'],19.8394429684,32.54317,571

  Bitrate is very low and PSNR seems unaffected by the crf setting (and very low compared to x264). The -cpu-used setting has very minimal impact and also seems that -2 and 2 are the same option.. What am I missing ? I expected libvpx to take more time to encode (which is definitely true) but at the same time higher quality transcodes. What parameters should I use to
  have a fair comparison with x264 ?

  Edit : Thanks to @mulvya and this doc I figured that to work in crf mode with libvpx I have to add -b:v 0. I re-ran my tests and I get :

      codec     , settings                                 , time        , PSNR     ,bitrate
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '-2'],57.6835780144,45.111158,17908
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '0'] ,401.360313892,45.285367,17431
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '20', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '2'] ,57.4941239357,45.111158,17908
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '-2'],49.175855875,42.588178,11085
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '0'] ,347.158324957,42.782194,10935
  
  libvpx-vp9,['-crf', '30', '-b:v', '0', '-cpu-used', '2'] ,49.1892938614,42.588178,11085

  PSNR and bitrate went up significantly by adding -b:v 0

• Adding FFMPEG Layer to HLS streaming causes video playback issues

  25 juin 2023, par Moe

  I have been searching a lot about HLS streaming and have succeeded to create a simple HLS streaming server with nodejs, the problem now is I need to add a layer of ffmpeg encoding to the .ts chunks before streaming to the user, without this layer everything works fine and on my server only 3 requests are seen :

  


  manifest.m3u8
output_000.ts
output_000.ts
output_001.ts
output_002.ts


  


  But then when I add a simple ffmpeg layer that literally copies everything from the ts file and output the stream (I will add of course dynamic filters to each request, thats why I need this ffmpeg layer), the player goes insane and request the whole video in just 5 seconds or something :

  


  manifest.m3u8
output_000.ts
output_000.ts
output_001.ts
output_002.ts
output_001.ts
output_003.ts
output_002.ts
...
output_095.ts


  


  I have also notices that the numbers aren't increasing uniformly and suspect this is part of the issue, I have tried adding more ffmpeg options to not do anything to the .ts files that are being fed to it as they are a part of a bigger video.

  


  Here's my NodeJS server (NextJS API route) :

  


  
const fs = require(`fs`);
const path = require(`path`);
const {exec, spawn} = require(`child_process`);
const pathToFfmpeg = require(`ffmpeg-static`);

export default function handler(req, res) {
  
    const { filename } = req.query;
    console.log(filename);
    const filePath = path.join(process.cwd(), 'public', 'stream', `${filename}`);
    const inputStream = fs.createReadStream(filePath);

    // first check if that is ts file..
    if(filename.indexOf(`.ts`) != -1){
  
      const ffmpegProcess = spawn(pathToFfmpeg, [
        '-f', `mpegts`,
        '-i', 'pipe:0', // specify input as pipe
        '-c', 'copy', 
        '-avoid_negative_ts', '0',
        `-map_metadata`, `0`,  // copy without re-encoding
        '-f', 'mpegts', // output format
        'pipe:1'        // specify output as pipe
      ], {
        stdio: ['pipe', 'pipe', 'pipe'] // enable logging by redirecting stderr to stdout
      });
      res.status(200);
      res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'application/vnd.apple.mpegurl');
      res.setHeader('Cache-Control', 'no-cache');
      res.setHeader('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*');
 

      // ffmpegProcess.stderr.pipe(process.stdout); // log stderr to stdout
  
      inputStream.pipe(ffmpegProcess.stdin);
      ffmpegProcess.stdout.pipe(res);
  
      ffmpegProcess.on('exit', (code) => {
        if (code !== 0) {
          console.error(`ffmpeg process exited with code ${code}`);
        }
      });
    }else{
      // if not then stream whatever file as it is
      res.status(200);
      res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'application/vnd.apple.mpegurl');
      inputStream.pipe(res);
    }
  }


  


  I have tried to feed the request's player appropriate headers but that didn't work, I have also tried to add the '-re' option to the ffmpeg encoder itself and hoped for minimal performance hits, but that also caused playback issue due to being too slow.