Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (8690)

• Matomo will now pay researchers 5,000 USD for a critical security vulnerability

  7 mai 2020, par Matomo Core Team
  Matomo Analytics is the leading open-source web analytics solution, designed to give you conclusive insights while respecting your user’s privacy, and keeping your data secure. We’re so proud Matomo is trusted with the analytics data of more than 1 million sites worldwide.

  Although we have had an excellent security track record so far, we recognise security is an ongoing challenge and requires constant vigilance. With this announcement we’re showing our commitment to reward those who help us maintain the highest security in Matomo.

  New bounty of 5,000 USD for a CRITICAL security issue responsibly disclosed to us

  We’re now paying 5,000 USD or 4,700 EUR for each critical vulnerability found, and responsibly disclosed to us. (Previously this bounty was less than 1,000USD.) 

  A Critical Issue in Matomo means an issue in our latest official release at : builds.matomo.org/latest.zip as installed on a typical server (and possibly using any of our official plugins by Matomo or InnoCraft from the Marketplace).

  If you can gain remote code execution on the server (i.e. RCE), or if you’re able to delete data with an HTTPS request (i.e. SQL Injection), this may qualify as a Critical Issue. Please report it on Hackerone.

  Matomo keeps your data secure

  The Matomo team has always been committed to achieving the highest standard of security. For example, Matomo was one of the first open-source projects in the world to launch a public bug bounty in January 2011. Every year many researchers, users and customers review the Matomo source code, and overall we’ve rewarded dozens of researchers over the years for their work in keeping Matomo data safe.

  How to make your Matomo server even more secure ?

  Check out our recommendations in How to configure Matomo for Security

   

• ffmpeg critical noise occured after silence remove filtering

  31 mars 2020, par SY KIM

  I’ve tried to remove silence duration in my audio file.
  and it seems like working well..
  but some problem rose up like the picutre i attached.

  ffmpeg -i "D://mono_test/silenceremove_test_raw.mp3" -filter:a silenceremove=1:0:-66dB -b:a 192k "D://mono_test/silenceremove_test.mp3"

  after silence remove filtering(in ffmpeg), some noise occured like picture(just left channel in the file). already control all parameters about silenceremove method, but the problem doesn’t disappear.

  any Ideas ?

  please help me..
  thnx.

  enter image description here

  add full ffmpeg log here

  ffmpeg version N-93986-gd3f236b300 Copyright (c) 2000-2019 the FFmpeg C:\Users\drunk>ffmpeg -i "D://mono_test/silenceremove_test_raw.mp3" -filter:a silenceremove=1:0:-66dB -b:a 192k "D://mono_test/silenceremove_test.mp3"
  
  ffmpeg version N-93986-gd3f236b300 Copyright (c) 2000-2019 the FFmpeg developers
  
    built with gcc 8.3.1 (GCC) 20190414
  
    configuration: --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --enable-sdl2 --enable-fontconfig --enable-gnutls --enable-iconv --enable-libass --enable-libdav1d --enable-libbluray --enable-libfreetype --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopus --enable-libshine --enable-libsnappy --enable-libsoxr --enable-libtheora --enable-libtwolame --enable-libvpx --enable-libwavpack --enable-libwebp --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 --enable-libxml2 --enable-libzimg --enable-lzma --enable-zlib --enable-gmp --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvo-amrwbenc --enable-libmysofa --enable-libspeex --enable-libxvid --enable-libaom --enable-libmfx --enable-amf --enable-ffnvcodec --enable-cuvid --enable-d3d11va --enable-nvenc --enable-nvdec --enable-dxva2 --enable-avisynth --enable-libopenmpt
  
    libavutil      56. 28.100 / 56. 28.100
  
    libavcodec     58. 52.102 / 58. 52.102
  
    libavformat    58. 27.103 / 58. 27.103
  
    libavdevice    58.  7.100 / 58.  7.100
  
    libavfilter     7. 55.100 /  7. 55.100
  
    libswscale      5.  4.101 /  5.  4.101
  
    libswresample   3.  4.100 /  3.  4.100
  
    libpostproc    55.  4.100 / 55.  4.100
  
  Input #0, mp3, from 'D://mono_test/silenceremove_test_raw.mp3':
  
    Metadata:
  
      title           : 190604_0026.mp3
  
      album           : TASCAM DR-07MK2
  
      genre           : Other
  
      encoder         : Lavf58.27.103
  
      id3v2_priv.XMP  : <?xpacket begin="\xef\xbb\xbf" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>\x0a\x0a \x0a  \x0a\x0a \x0a  /drive.google.com/open?id=1r-V-xesdO8pQ9_HGMweBUm6b0QRxwql2" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://drive.google.com/open?id=1r-V-xesdO8pQ9_HGMweBUm6b0QRxwql2
  
  
  
  <p>silenceremove_test_raw.mp3 &lt;- this file is original data before silenceremove process.</p>

• Which Platform/Language to choose for Video Management System [closed]

  5 décembre 2019, par Vivek Buddhadev

  We have started on a new project, Which enables for the multiple IP cameras(Around 1000 Cameras) to record as well as available for live streaming.

  Like https://www.security.honeywell.com/uk/product-repository/maxpro-vms

  Initially, we have tried using ffmpeg commands that saves data in chunks :

  ffmpeg -i {rtsp_url} -fflags flush_packets -max_delay 2 -flags -global_header \
  
      -hls_time 2 -hls_list_size 3 -vcodec copy -y /var/www/html/Cam01.m3u8

  Then we have started http server and using node.js we are displaying the stream.

  But as we are adding more cameras into it, the performance is going down.

  Kindly suggest if there is any other way to achieve this functionality which help us to fulfill the above requirement.