
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (61)
-
Des sites réalisés avec MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parCette page présente quelques-uns des sites fonctionnant sous MediaSPIP.
Vous pouvez bien entendu ajouter le votre grâce au formulaire en bas de page. -
La file d’attente de SPIPmotion
28 novembre 2010, parUne file d’attente stockée dans la base de donnée
Lors de son installation, SPIPmotion crée une nouvelle table dans la base de donnée intitulée spip_spipmotion_attentes.
Cette nouvelle table est constituée des champs suivants : id_spipmotion_attente, l’identifiant numérique unique de la tâche à traiter ; id_document, l’identifiant numérique du document original à encoder ; id_objet l’identifiant unique de l’objet auquel le document encodé devra être attaché automatiquement ; objet, le type d’objet auquel (...) -
MediaSPIP version 0.1 Beta
16 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta est la première version de MediaSPIP décrétée comme "utilisable".
Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
Pour avoir une installation fonctionnelle, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...)
Sur d’autres sites (13314)
-
FFmpeg av_read_frame not reading frames properly ?
16 juin 2019, par Sir DrinksCoffeeALotAlright, so I’ve downloaded some raw UHD sequences in .yuv format and encoded them with ffmpeg in .mp4 container (h264 4:4:4, 100% quality, 25fps). When i use ffprobe to find out how many frames are encoded i get 600, so that’s 24 secs of video.
BUT, when i run those encoded video sequences through
av_read_frame
i only get like 40-50% of frames processed beforeav_read_frame
returns error code-12
. So I’m wild guessing that there are some data packages in middle of the streams which get read byav_read_frame
and forces a function to return-12
.What my questions are, how should i deal with this problem so i can encode full number of frames (600) ? When
av_read_frame
returns value different from0
should iav_free_packet
and proceed to read next frame ? Sinceav_read_frame
returns values< 0
for error codes, which error code is used forEOF
so i can insulate end of file code ? -
FFmpeg av_read_frame not reading frames properly ?
2 août 2016, par Sir DrinksCoffeeALotAlright, so I’ve downloaded some raw UHD sequences in .yuv format and encoded them with ffmpeg in .mp4 container (h264 4:4:4, 100% quality, 25fps). When i use ffprobe to find out how many frames are encoded i get 600, so that’s 24 secs of video.
BUT, when i run those encoded video sequences through
av_read_frame
i only get like 40-50% of frames processed beforeav_read_frame
returns error code-12
. So I’m wild guessing that there are some data packages in middle of the streams which get read byav_read_frame
and forces a function to return-12
.What my questions are, how should i deal with this problem so i can encode full number of frames (600) ? When
av_read_frame
returns value different from0
should iav_free_packet
and proceed to read next frame ? Sinceav_read_frame
returns values< 0
for error codes, which error code is used forEOF
so i can insulate end of file code ? -
How to process video stream ?
27 avril 2016, par sharpenerI would like to ask some experienced multimedia professional how to proceed with following task :
Given URL provides video stream and we would like to get access to decoded frames (byte stream in memory) in managed
Win7+
application (C#
). We don’t want to render/present the frames the standard way. The video format is known but not fixed (might get changed between two successive sessions, but we will know the parameters).So far, I have found there are several methods and I have build following picture in my mind :
ffmpeg
wrapper- Pros
- Self contained (no dependency to windows technologies)
- Powerful
- Cons
- Little more complex to understand
- Lot of different wrapping variants (
FFmpeg.NET
,ffmpeg-sharp
,ffmpeg-shard
,FFmpeg.AutoGen
, ...)
- Pros
DirectShow
wrapper- Pros
- Widely used/supported technology (variaous filters freely available)
- Nice/detailed documentation on
MSDN
- Cons
- Quite old
- Considered obsolete from the point of author’s view (available only for
desktop
model on runtime >= Win8)
- Pros
MediaFoundation
wrapper- Pros
- Theoretical successor of
DirectShow
, so should be available in the future
- Theoretical successor of
- Cons
- Seems to be not as good as
DirectShow
- Not very popular, limited "community" support
- Seems to be not as good as
- Pros
FFmpegInterop
wrapper- Pros
- Microsoft’s open source wrapper alternative
- Cons
- Not available for runtime < Win8
- Pros