Recherche avancée

Médias (29)

Mot : - Tags -/Musique

Autres articles (106)

  • MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version

    25 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
    The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
    To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
    If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...)

  • Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond

    5 septembre 2013, par

    Certains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;

  • Use, discuss, criticize

    13 avril 2011, par

    Talk to people directly involved in MediaSPIP’s development, or to people around you who could use MediaSPIP to share, enhance or develop their creative projects.
    The bigger the community, the more MediaSPIP’s potential will be explored and the faster the software will evolve.
    A discussion list is available for all exchanges between users.

Sur d’autres sites (13039)

  • avcodec/vc1dec : Re-order init to avoid initting hwaccel too early

    8 août 2015, par Philip Langdale
    avcodec/vc1dec : Re-order init to avoid initting hwaccel too early
    

    At least for vdpau, the hwaccel init code tries to check the video
    profile and ensure that there is a matching vdpau profile available.

    If it can’t find a match, it will fail to initialise.

    In the case of wmv3/vc1, I observed initialisation to fail all the
    time. It turns out that this is due to the hwaccel being initialised
    very early in the codec init, before the profile has been extracted
    and set.

    Conceptually, it’s a simple fix to reorder the init code, but it gets
    messy really fast because ff_get_format(), which is what implicitly
    trigger hwaccel init, is called multiple times through various shared
    init calls from h263, etc. It’s incredibly hard to prove to my own
    satisfaction that it’s safe to move the vc1 specific init code
    ahead of this generic code, but all the vc1 fate tests pass, and I’ve
    visually inspected a couple of samples and things seem correct.

    Signed-off-by : Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org>

    • [DH] libavcodec/vc1dec.c
  • How can I learn the effective quality of the h264_nvenc encoder ?

    24 septembre 2020, par pfdint2

    I seek to ascertain the end-product quality of various cq ("constant quality") values for the h264_nvenc video encoder.

    &#xA;

    To use the h264_nvenc encoder through ffmpeg and with a target quality, I follow the instructions in Nvidia's documentation, last paragraph of the linked anchor.

    &#xA;

    I specify a Variable Bit Rate rate control mode (rc=vbr_hq) and a target quality (cq=). This should be enough to test various values of cq. The story should end there.

    &#xA;

    HOWEVER, that only outputs the same perfect quality video of extremely large size for any cq value. (Using cq=1, cq=20, and cq=51 all output a file with the same hash.)

    &#xA;

    Per documentation, I can also specify a maxBitRate (maxrate=). If I don't specify a maxrate, the documentation indicates :

    &#xA;

    &#xA;

    If maxBitRate is not specified, the encoder will use as many bits as needed to achieve the target quality.

    &#xA;

    &#xA;

    But that's not the behavior I'm observing. I'm seeing the encoder use as many bits as possible, not as many bits as needed. The resultant video has an overall bitrate of 100Mb/s. Double the source video.

    &#xA;

    If I do set a maxrate, it is observed by the encoder. But if I have to set the bitrate correctly for every cq value, what is the point of the cq value ? I would just set cq=1 and test various bitrates, which would then only be applicable to a specific video.

    &#xA;

    Is there some warning or output that notes that the bitrate was insufficient to reach the target quality that I'm not seeing ? That would at least allow me to brute force this.

    &#xA;

    Or am I misunderstanding the relationship between these settings ?

    &#xA;

  • How can I learn the effective quality of the h264_nvenc encoder ?

    24 septembre 2020, par pfdint2

    I seek to ascertain the end-product quality of various cq ("constant quality") values for the h264_nvenc video encoder.

    &#xA;

    To use the h264_nvenc encoder through ffmpeg and with a target quality, I follow the instructions in Nvidia's documentation, last paragraph of the linked anchor.

    &#xA;

    I specify a Variable Bit Rate rate control mode (rc=vbr_hq) and a target quality (cq=). This should be enough to test various values of cq. The story should end there.

    &#xA;

    HOWEVER, that only outputs the same perfect quality video of extremely large size for any cq value. (Using cq=1, cq=20, and cq=51 all output a file with the same hash.)

    &#xA;

    Per documentation, I can also specify a maxBitRate (maxrate=). If I don't specify a maxrate, the documentation indicates :

    &#xA;

    &#xA;

    If maxBitRate is not specified, the encoder will use as many bits as needed to achieve the target quality.

    &#xA;

    &#xA;

    But that's not the behavior I'm observing. I'm seeing the encoder use as many bits as possible, not as many bits as needed. The resultant video has an overall bitrate of 100Mb/s. Double the source video.

    &#xA;

    If I do set a maxrate, it is observed by the encoder. But if I have to set the bitrate correctly for every cq value, what is the point of the cq value ? I would just set cq=1 and test various bitrates, which would then only be applicable to a specific video.

    &#xA;

    Is there some warning or output that notes that the bitrate was insufficient to reach the target quality that I'm not seeing ? That would at least allow me to brute force this.

    &#xA;

    Or am I misunderstanding the relationship between these settings ?

    &#xA;