Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (9822)

• Origin Crusader Media

  14 février 2012, par Multimedia Mike — Game Hacking

  A gleaming copy of the old Origin game Crusader : No Remorse showed up today :

  
  
  

  Immediately, I delved in expecting to find Xan-encoded AVI files that would play perfectly using FFmpeg/Libav. Instead, I found a directory labeled flics/ that indeed has a lot of AVI files, but not in Xan. The programs attempt to interpret them as raw RGB. The strangest thing is the first frame often looks correct, if upside down :

  
  
  

  The first file I peered inside had the video FourCC ‘RRV1′. Searching for this led me to this discussion forum where people have already been hacking on this very format (Origin games invariably get a heap of lasting love). The forum participants have observed that 3 codecs are in play in this flics/ directory, including ‘RRV1′, ‘RRV2′, and ‘JYV1′, which apparently correspond to the initials of certain developers. The reason that the programs identify the files as raw RGB is because the FourCCs don’t appear everywhere that they’re supposed to. Additionally, there are several trailers for other Origin/EA games stored in Cinepak format elsewhere on the disc.

  It seems that I’m the person who added this title to the Xan wiki page, obviously with no first-hand evidence to back it up. Meanwhile, the forum participants speculate that the files are descended from the old Autodesk FLIC format (which would explain why they live in a directory called flics/). Corroborating strings extracted from the CRUSADER.EXE file include “FlicWait”, “FlicPlayer”, “Flic %s not found.”, “flicpath”, and “FLICPLAY.C”.

  The disc also features a sound/ directory which contains AMF files. Suxen Drol already documented these on the wiki as Asylum Media Format files. The disc contains an ASYLUM.DLL file as well as a utility called MOD2AMF.EXE. The latter works beautifully on a random MOD file I had laying around. The AMF file is a bit larger.

  Samples for all 3 FourCCs can be found here, while the AMF files and associated utilities are here.

• Managing Music Playback Channels

  30 juin 2013, par Multimedia Mike — General

  My Game Music Appreciation site allows users to interact with old video game music by toggling various channels, as long as the underlying synthesizer engine supports it.

  
  
  

  Users often find their way to the Nintendo DS section pretty quickly. This is when they notice an obnoxious quirk with the channel toggling feature : specifically, one channel doesn’t seem to map to a particular instrument or track.

  When it comes to computer music playback methodologies, I have long observed that there are 2 general strategies : Fixed channel and dynamic channel allocation.

  Fixed Channel Approach
  One of my primary sources of computer-based entertainment used to be watching music. Sure I listened to it as well. But for things like Amiga MOD files and related tracker formats, there was a rich ecosystem of fun music playback programs that visualized the music. There exist music visualization modes in various music players these days (such as iTunes and Windows Media Player), but those largely just show you a single wave form. These files were real time syntheses based on multiple audio channels and usually showed some form of analysis for each channel. My personal favorite was Cubic Player :

  
  
  

  Most of these players supported the concept of masking individual channels. In doing so, the user could isolate, study, and enjoy different components of the song. For many 4-channel Amiga MOD files, I observed that the common arrangement was to use the 4 channels for beat (percussion track), bass line, chords, and melody. Thus, it was easy to just listen to, e.g., the bass line in isolation.

  MODs and similar formats specified precisely which digital audio sample to play at what time and on which specific audio channel. To view the internals of one of these formats, one gets the impression that they contain an extremely computer-centric view of music.

  Dynamic Channel Allocation Algorithm
  MODs et al. enjoyed a lot of popularity, but the standard for computer music is MIDI. While MOD and friends took a computer-centric view of music, MIDI takes, well, a music-centric view of music.

  There are MIDI visualization programs as well. The one that came with my Gravis Ultrasound was called PLAYMIDI.EXE. It looked like this…

  
  
  

  … and it confused me. There are 16 distinct channels being visualized but some channels are shown playing multiple notes. When I dug into the technical details, I learned that MIDI just specifies what notes need to be played, at what times and frequencies and using which instrument samples, and it was the MIDI playback program’s job to make it happen.

  Thus, if a MIDI file specifies that track 1 should play a C major chord consisting of notes C, E, and G, it would transmit events “key-on C ; delta time 0 ; key-on E ; delta time 0 ; key-on G ; delta time … ; [other commands]“. If the playback program has access to multiple channels (say, up to 32, in the case of the GUS), the intuitive approach would be to maintain a pool of all available channels. Then, when it’s time to process the “key-on C” event, fetch the first available channel from the pool, mark it as in-use, play C on the channel, and return that channel to the pool when either the sample runs its course or the corresponding “key-off C” event is encountered in the MIDI command stream.

  About That Game Music
  Circling back around to my game music website, numerous supported systems use the fixed channel approach for playback while others use dynamic channel allocation approach, including evey Nintendo DS game I have so far analyzed.

  Which approach is better ? As in many technical matters, there are trade-offs either way. For many systems, the fixed channel approach is necessary because for many older audio synthesis systems, different channels had very specific purposes. The 8-bit NES had 5 channels : 2 square wave generators (used musically for melody/treble), 1 triangle wave generator (usually used for bass line), a noise generator (subverted for all manner of percussive sounds), and a limited digital channel (was sometimes assigned richer percussive sounds). Dynamic channel allocation wouldn’t work here.

  But the dynamic approach works great on hardware with 16 digital channels available like, for example, the Nintendo DS. Digital channels are very general-purpose. What about the SNES, with its 8 digital channels ? Either approach could work. In practice, most games used a fixed channel approach : Games might use 4-6 channels for music while reserving the remainder for various in-game sound effects. Some notable exceptions to this pattern were David Wise’s compositions for Rare’s SNES games (think Battletoads and the various Donkey Kong Country titles). These clearly use some dynamic channel approach since masking all but one channel will give you a variety of instrument sounds.

  Epilogue
  There ! That took a long time to explain but I find it fascinating for some reason. I need to distill it down to far fewer words because I want to make it a FAQ on my website for “Why can’t I isolate specific tracks for Nintendo DS games ?”

  Actually, perhaps I should remove the ability to toggle Nintendo DS channels in the first place. Here’s a funny tale of needless work : I found the Vio2sf engine for synthesizing Nintendo DS music and incorporated it into the program. It didn’t support toggling of individual channels so I figured out a way to add that feature to the engine. And then I noticed that most Nintendo DS games render that feature moot. After I released the webapp, I learned that I was out of date on the Vio2sf engine. The final insult was that the latest version already supports channel toggling. So I did the work for nothing. But then again, since I want to remove that feature from the UI, doubly so.

• node-fluent-ffmpeg doesn't resize videos correctly when given specific size

  8 décembre 2019, par Yagiz

  Version information

  • fluent-ffmpeg version : 2.1.2
  • ffmpeg version : ffmpeg version 4.1.3
  • OS : mac os x mojave 10.14.3

  Code to reproduce

  First cut the videos using this command :

  const cutVideo = async (currentWord) => {
  
      return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
  
          console.log('cutting video', currentWord.file)
  
          ffmpeg(currentWord.file)
  
              .videoCodec('libx264')
  
              // .addOptions('-vf "setdar=ratio=16/9:max=1000"')
  
              .on('start', command => console.log('command', command))
  
              .on('error', reject)
  
              .on('end', resolve)
  
              .withSize('640x360')
  
              .withAspect('16:9')
  
              .applyAutopadding(true, 'black')
  
              .saveToFile(currentWord.file.replace('-unfinished', ''), './')
  
      })
  
  }

  Later merge them together using .mergeToFile() command :

  const mergeFilesAsync = async function(files, folder, filename)
  
  {
  
      return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
  
          console.log('merging files', files)
  
          var cmd = ffmpeg({ logger: console })
  
              .videoCodec('libx264')
  
              .on('start', command => console.log('command', command))
  
              .on('error', reject)
  
              .on('end', resolve)
  
  
  
          for (var i = 0; i < files.length; i++)
  
          {
  
              const currentWord = files[i]
  
              cmd.input(currentWord.file.replace('-unfinished', ''))
  
          }
  
  
  
          cmd.mergeToFile(folder + "/" + filename, folder);
  
      });
  
  }

  Expected results

  The videos resized in cutVideo function should have 640x360 size with 16:9 aspect ratio.

  Observed results

  The first video processed had a dimension of : 850 × 480, the output after processing it is : 642 × 360 (It should be 640x360)

  The second video processed had a dimension of : 1152 × 480, the output after processing it is : 638 × 360

  The third video processed had a dimension of 853 × 480, the output after processing it is : 642 × 360

  FFmpeg command produced by fluent-ffmpeg :

  ffmpeg -i /Users/yagiz/Desktop/video-creator/what's-unfinished.mp4 -y -vcodec libx264 -filter:v scale=w='if(gt(a,1.7777777777777777),640,trunc(360*a/2)*2)':h='if(lt(a,1.7777777777777777),360,trunc(640/a/2)*2)',pad=w=640:h=360:x='if(gt(a,1.7777777777777777),0,(640-iw)/2)':y='if(lt(a,1.7777777777777777),0,(360-ih)/2)':color=black /Users/yagiz/Desktop/video-creator/what's.mp4
  
  cutting video /Users/yagiz/Desktop/video-creator/up?-unfinished.mp4

  and

  ffmpeg -i /Users/yagiz/Desktop/video-creator/up?-unfinished.mp4 -y -vcodec libx264 -filter:v scale=w='if(gt(a,1.7777777777777777),640,trunc(360*a/2)*2)':h='if(lt(a,1.7777777777777777),360,trunc(640/a/2)*2)',pad=w=640:h=360:x='if(gt(a,1.7777777777777777),0,(640-iw)/2)':y='if(lt(a,1.7777777777777777),0,(360-ih)/2)':color=black /Users/yagiz/Desktop/video-creator/up?.mp4

  I think that 1.77777 value in this command produces a lower bound or an upper bound of the actual item.

  Any idea where the issue lies ?

  Thanks !