Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/protocoles

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (53)

  • Gestion générale des documents

    13 mai 2011, par

    MédiaSPIP ne modifie jamais le document original mis en ligne.
    Pour chaque document mis en ligne il effectue deux opérations successives : la création d’une version supplémentaire qui peut être facilement consultée en ligne tout en laissant l’original téléchargeable dans le cas où le document original ne peut être lu dans un navigateur Internet ; la récupération des métadonnées du document original pour illustrer textuellement le fichier ;
    Les tableaux ci-dessous expliquent ce que peut faire MédiaSPIP (...)

  • List of compatible distributions

    26 avril 2011, par

    The table below is the list of Linux distributions compatible with the automated installation script of MediaSPIP. Distribution nameVersion nameVersion number Debian Squeeze 6.x.x Debian Weezy 7.x.x Debian Jessie 8.x.x Ubuntu The Precise Pangolin 12.04 LTS Ubuntu The Trusty Tahr 14.04
    If you want to help us improve this list, you can provide us access to a machine whose distribution is not mentioned above or send the necessary fixes to add (...)

  • Des sites réalisés avec MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    Cette page présente quelques-uns des sites fonctionnant sous MediaSPIP.
    Vous pouvez bien entendu ajouter le votre grâce au formulaire en bas de page.

Sur d’autres sites (6071)

  • Merge commit ’b141c7b37eb52aca41ac83738f159b63b9c09d5c’

    8 février 2014, par Michael Niedermayer
    Merge commit ’b141c7b37eb52aca41ac83738f159b63b9c09d5c’
    

    * commit ’b141c7b37eb52aca41ac83738f159b63b9c09d5c’ :
    h264 : give numbers to nalus

    Merged-by : Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>

    • [DH] libavcodec/h264.h
  • Problem with ffmpeg function avformat_seek_file()

    19 avril 2013, par Kael

    I am trying to seek the given frame in the video using ffmpeg library. I knew that there is av_seek_frame() function but it was recommended to use avformat_seek_file()instead. Something similar mentioned here. I know that avformat_seek_file() can't always take you to exact frame you want, but this is ok for me. I just want to jump to the nearest keyframe. So i open the video, find videostream and calling it like this :
    avformat_seek_file( formatContext, streamId, 0, frameNumber, frameNumber, AVSEEK_FLAG_FRAME ). It always returns 0, so i understand it as correct finish. However, it doesn't work as it should to. I check byte position like here before and after calling avformat_seek_file(). Actually it changes, but it changes always in the same way whenever i'm trying to put different target frame numbers ! I mean that byteposition after this call is always same even with different frameNumber values. Obviously, i'm doing something wrong but i don't know what exactly. I don't know if it does matter but i'm using .h264 files for that. I tried different flags, different files, using timestamps instead of frames, flushing buffers before and after and so on but it doesn't work for me. I will be very grateful if someone could show me what is wrong with it.

  • ffmpeg Decoding Progress during Frame Extarction

    4 avril 2013, par Isantipov

    I scan input video to extract certain frames using ffmpeg's select filter. The selection is based on a complex creteria and the number of extracted frames can't be predicted (I'm doing scene detection, but this can be something different - e.g. selecting all the I frames, etc).

    What I need is to display the percentage of scanned (decoded) video (e.g. 10% or 90%).


    I tried several ways to do this parsing console output as people usually do when dealing with encoding, but it doesn't help with the progress of scanning (e.g. Can ffmpeg show a progress bar ? or ffmpeg Progress Bar - Encoding Percentage in PHP)

    ffmpeg -progress sceneProgr.txt -i input.wmv -vsync passthrough -an -vf select=&#39;gt(scene\,0.2)&#39;,showinfo scene%%05d.png

    The output this produces is as follows :

    &lt;..>    
    frame=    0 fps=0.0 q=0.0 size=N/A time=00:00:00.00 bitrate=N/A    
    n:0 pts:16550 pts_time:16.55 pos:4205325 fmt:rgb24 sar:0/1 s:640x480 i:P iskey:1 type:I checksum:95895BC9 plane_checksum:[95895BC9]
    frame=    1 fps=0.7 q=0.0 size=N/A time=00:00:00.00 bitrate=N/A    
    n:1 pts:24591 pts_time:24.591 pos:6685325 fmt:rgb24 sar:0/1 s:640x480 i:P iskey:0 type:P checksum:FF4CC015 plane_checksum:[FF4CC015]
    &#39;frame=...&#39; and &#39;n:...&#39; lines are repeated for each of the extracted frames.

    Both frame=... and n:... lines refer to the numbers in the output and therefore can't be used to calculate progress the way people usually do this (as I can't predict how many frames will be found beforehead and besides, they are not uniformly spread across the input video).


    If I specify -progress progress.txt parameter, the progress.txt file is as follows :

    frame=5
    fps=1.2
    stream_0_0_q=0.0
    total_size=N/A
    out_time_ms=43209833
    out_time=00:00:43.209833
    dup_frames=0
    drop_frames=0
    progress=continue


    frame=6
    fps=1.3
    stream_0_0_q=0.0
    total_size=N/A
    out_time_ms=52252200
    out_time=00:00:52.252200
    dup_frames=0
    drop_frames=0
    progress=continue

    frame=6
    fps=1.2
    stream_0_0_q=0.0
    total_size=N/A
    out_time_ms=52252200
    out_time=00:00:52.252200
    dup_frames=0
    drop_frames=0
    progress=continue

    New portion is written approximately every second and refers to the last extracted frame.
    Which is somewhat helpful as out_time refers to the last extracted frames' position in the input video, so I can calculate the progress of the scan from it as

    progress = out_time_ms/total_input_time

    But this is not ideal as it will be updated only when the new frame which matches the select criteria is extracted. So, If I have a large portion of video with no matching frames, the progress won't change for a lot of time.


    Wrapping-up :

    I am looking for a way to calculate the progress of video scanning when using select filter.

    Any ideas are strongly appreciated.