
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (59)
-
Websites made with MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parThis page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.
-
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...) -
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir
Sur d’autres sites (9247)
-
Revision 8e9819230d : Merge "Remove obselete code" into experimental
10 avril 2013, par Yaowu XuMerge "Remove obselete code" into experimental
-
lavfi/curves : introduce "all" field in presets and use it.
11 avril 2013, par Clément Bœschlavfi/curves : introduce "all" field in presets and use it.
-
FFMPEG : extracting jpegs at 1 fps rate with "-r 1" or "vf fps=fps=1" causes first three frames to be wrong [closed]
11 avril 2013, par StefanI need to use ffmpeg to extract video stills from a video, one picture per second, starting with second 0. I created a 4min test video with a running timecode (25fps, starting with 00:00:00 running to 03:59:24) If I use either
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -f image2 -r 1 still-%d.jpeg
or
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -f image2 -vf fps="fps=1" still-%d.jpeg
I fail because the first three images do not display expected time codes 00:00:00, 00:01:00, 00:02:00, but 00:00:00, 00:00:01, 00:00:13, and all subsequent images show having frame 13 in their timecode (and not :00). This causes my video preview to be off by 1-2 seconds.
I had to resort to invoke ffmpeg for each frame, using -ss 0..240 and -vframes 1 to extract exactly one frame at the exact time. This works perfectly, all output files show the timecode of the first frame of that second.
This method is considerably slower, however, and I'd rather not use it.
Is there something I missed with the -r option or fps filter ? I tried specifying fps=fps=1:round=zero, but I got an error saying that the key "round" was not found.
Thank you in advance !