Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (6373)

• What is “interoperable TTML” ?

  1er janvier 2014, par silvia

  I’ve just tried to come to terms with the latest state of TTML, the Timed Text Markup Language.

  TTML has been specified by the W3C Timed Text Working Group and released as a RECommendation v1.0 in November 2010. Since then, several organisations have tried to adopt it as their caption file format. This includes the SMPTE, the EBU (European Broadcasting Union), and Microsoft.

  Both, Microsoft and the EBU actually looked at TTML in detail and decided that in order to make it usable for their use cases, a restriction of its functionalities is needed.

  EBU-TT

  The EBU released EBU-TT, which restricts the set of valid attributes and feature. “The EBU-TT format is intended to constrain the features provided by TTML, especially to make EBU-TT more suitable for the use with broadcast video and web video applications.” (see EBU-TT).

  In addition, EBU-specific namespaces were introduce to extend TTML with EBU-specific data types, e.g. ebuttdt:frameRateMultiplierType or ebuttdt:smpteTimingType. Similarly, a bunch of metadata elements were introduced, e.g. ebuttm:documentMetadata, ebuttm:documentEbuttVersion, or ebuttm:documentIdentifier.

  The use of namespaces as an extensibility mechanism will ascertain that EBU-TT files continue to be valid TTML files. However, any vanilla TTML parser will not know what to do with these custom extensions and will drop them on the floor.

  Simple Delivery Profile

  With the intention to make TTML ready for “internet delivery of Captions originated in the United States”, Microsoft proposed a “Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions (US)” (see Simple Profile). The Simple Profile is also a restriction of TTML.

  Unfortunately, the Microsoft profile is not the same as the EBU-TT profile : for example, it contains the “set” element, which is not conformant in EBU-TT. Similarly, the supported style features are different, e.g. Simple Profile supports “display-region”, while EBU-TT does not. On the other hand, EBU-TT supports monospace, sans-serif and serif fonts, while the Simple profile does not.

  Thus files created for the Simple Delivery Profile will not work on players that expect EBU-TT and the reverse.

  Fortunately, the Simple Delivery Profile does not introduce any new namespaces and new features, so at least it is an explicit subpart of TTML and not both a restriction and extension like EBU-TT.

  SMPTE-TT

  SMPTE also created a version of the TTML standard called SMPTE-TT. SMPTE did not decide on a subset of TTML for their purposes – it was simply adopted as a complete set. “This Standard provides a framework for timed text to be supported for content delivered via broadband means,…” (see SMPTE-TT).

  However, SMPTE extended TTML in SMPTE-TT with an ability to store a binary blob with captions in another format. This allows using SMPTE-TT as a transport format for any caption format and is deemed to help with “backwards compatibility”.

  Now, instead of specifying a profile, SMPTE decided to define how to convert CEA-608 captions to SMPTE-TT. Even if it’s not called a “profile”, that’s actually what it is. It even has its own namespace : “m608 :”.

  Conclusion

  With all these different versions of TTML, I ask myself what a video player that claims support for TTML will do to get something working. The only chance it has is to implement all the extensions defined in all the different profiles. I pity the player that has to deal with a SMPTE-TT file that has a binary blob in it and is expected to be able to decode this.

  Now, what is a caption author supposed to do when creating TTML ? They obviously cannot expect all players to be able to play back all TTML versions. Should they create different files depending on what platform they are targeting, i.e. a EBU-TT version, a SMPTE-TT version, a vanilla TTML version, and a Simple Delivery Profile version ? Should they by throwing all the features of all the versions into one TTML file and hope that the players will pick out the right things that they require and drop the rest on the floor ?

  Maybe the best way to progress would be to make a list of the “safe” features : those features that every TTML profile supports. That may be the best way to get an “interoperable TTML” file. Here’s me hoping that this minimal set of features doesn’t just end up being the usual (starttime, endtime, text) triple.

  UPDATE :

  I just found out that UltraViolet have their own profile of SMPTE-TT called CFF-TT (see UltraViolet FAQ and spec). They are making some SMPTE-TT fields optional, but introduce a new @forcedDisplayMode attribute under their own namespace “cff :”.

• What is “interoperable TTML” ?

  19 septembre 2012, par silvia

  I’ve just tried to come to terms with the latest state of TTML, the Timed Text Markup Language.

  TTML has been specified by the W3C Timed Text Working Group and released as a RECommendation v1.0 in November 2010. Since then, several organisations have tried to adopt it as their caption file format. This includes the SMPTE, the EBU (European Broadcasting Union), and Microsoft.

  Both, Microsoft and the EBU actually looked at TTML in detail and decided that in order to make it usable for their use cases, a restriction of its functionalities is needed.

  EBU-TT

  The EBU released EBU-TT, which restricts the set of valid attributes and feature. “The EBU-TT format is intended to constrain the features provided by TTML, especially to make EBU-TT more suitable for the use with broadcast video and web video applications.” (see EBU-TT).

  In addition, EBU-specific namespaces were introduce to extend TTML with EBU-specific data types, e.g. ebuttdt:frameRateMultiplierType or ebuttdt:smpteTimingType. Similarly, a bunch of metadata elements were introduced, e.g. ebuttm:documentMetadata, ebuttm:documentEbuttVersion, or ebuttm:documentIdentifier.

  The use of namespaces as an extensibility mechanism will ascertain that EBU-TT files continue to be valid TTML files. However, any vanilla TTML parser will not know what to do with these custom extensions and will drop them on the floor.

  Simple Delivery Profile

  With the intention to make TTML ready for “internet delivery of Captions originated in the United States”, Microsoft proposed a “Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions (US)” (see Simple Profile). The Simple Profile is also a restriction of TTML.

  Unfortunately, the Microsoft profile is not the same as the EBU-TT profile : for example, it contains the “set” element, which is not conformant in EBU-TT. Similarly, the supported style features are different, e.g. Simple Profile supports “display-region”, while EBU-TT does not. On the other hand, EBU-TT supports monospace, sans-serif and serif fonts, while the Simple profile does not.

  Thus files created for the Simple Delivery Profile will not work on players that expect EBU-TT and the reverse.

  Fortunately, the Simple Delivery Profile does not introduce any new namespaces and new features, so at least it is an explicit subpart of TTML and not both a restriction and extension like EBU-TT.

  SMPTE-TT

  SMPTE also created a version of the TTML standard called SMPTE-TT. SMPTE did not decide on a subset of TTML for their purposes – it was simply adopted as a complete set. “This Standard provides a framework for timed text to be supported for content delivered via broadband means,…” (see SMPTE-TT).

  However, SMPTE extended TTML in SMPTE-TT with an ability to store a binary blob with captions in another format. This allows using SMPTE-TT as a transport format for any caption format and is deemed to help with “backwards compatibility”.

  Now, instead of specifying a profile, SMPTE decided to define how to convert CEA-608 captions to SMPTE-TT. Even if it’s not called a “profile”, that’s actually what it is. It even has its own namespace : “m608 :”.

  Conclusion

  With all these different versions of TTML, I ask myself what a video player that claims support for TTML will do to get something working. The only chance it has is to implement all the extensions defined in all the different profiles. I pity the player that has to deal with a SMPTE-TT file that has a binary blob in it and is expected to be able to decode this.

  Now, what is a caption author supposed to do when creating TTML ? They obviously cannot expect all players to be able to play back all TTML versions. Should they create different files depending on what platform they are targeting, i.e. a EBU-TT version, a SMPTE-TT version, a vanilla TTML version, and a Simple Delivery Profile version ? Should they by throwing all the features of all the versions into one TTML file and hope that the players will pick out the right things that they require and drop the rest on the floor ?

  Maybe the best way to progress would be to make a list of the “safe” features : those features that every TTML profile supports. That may be the best way to get an “interoperable TTML” file. Here’s me hoping that this minimal set of features doesn’t just end up being the usual (starttime, endtime, text) triple.

  UPDATE :

  I just found out that UltraViolet have their own profile of SMPTE-TT called CFF-TT (see UltraViolet FAQ and spec). They are making some SMPTE-TT fields optional, but introduce a new @forcedDisplayMode attribute under their own namespace “cff :”.

• ffmpeg rtsp stream to YouTube livestream not doing anything

  29 mai 2018, par felixosth

  I’m using C# to initiate ffmpeg. I’ve a onvif bridge server for a CCTV VMS and I’m building a application to enable the user to livestream any CCTV camera to YouTube.

  The rtsp stream to the camera looks like this :

  rtsp ://onvif:bridge@localhost:554/live/xxxxx-xxxguidtocameraxxx-xxxxx

  I’m new to ffmpeg and I’m using this arg :

  -f lavfi -i anullsrc -rtsp_transport udp -i camerastreamurl -tune zerolatency -vcodec libx264 -pix_fmt + -c:v copy -c:a aac -strict experimental -f flv rtmp ://x.rtmp.youtube.com/live2/streamkey -loglevel debug

  It seems like ffmpeg isn’t finding the camera stream, only the fake audio one. It just freezes.

  This is the result of the debug log :

  ffmpeg version N-91172-gebf85d3190 Copyright (c) 2000-2018 the FFmpeg developers
  
    built with gcc 7.3.0 (GCC)
  
    configuration: --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --enable-sdl2 --enable-bzlib --enable-fontconfig --enable-gnutls --enable-iconv --enable-libass --enable-libbluray --enable-libfreetype --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopus --enable-libshine --enable-libsnappy --enable-libsoxr --enable-libtheora --enable-libtwolame --enable-libvpx --enable-libwavpack --enable-libwebp --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 --enable-libxml2 --enable-libzimg --enable-lzma --enable-zlib --enable-gmp --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvo-amrwbenc --enable-libmysofa --enable-libspeex --enable-libxvid --enable-libaom --enable-libmfx --enable-amf --enable-ffnvcodec --enable-cuvid --enable-d3d11va --enable-nvenc --enable-nvdec --enable-dxva2 --enable-avisynth
  
    libavutil      56. 18.102 / 56. 18.102
  
    libavcodec     58. 19.104 / 58. 19.104
  
    libavformat    58. 17.100 / 58. 17.100
  
    libavdevice    58.  4.100 / 58.  4.100
  
    libavfilter     7. 24.100 /  7. 24.100
  
    libswscale      5.  2.100 /  5.  2.100
  
    libswresample   3.  2.100 /  3.  2.100
  
    libpostproc    55.  2.100 / 55.  2.100
  
  Splitting the commandline.
  
  Reading option '-f' ... matched as option 'f' (force format) with argument 'lavfi'.
  
  Reading option '-i' ... matched as input url with argument 'anullsrc'.
  
  Reading option '-rtsp_transport' ... matched as AVOption 'rtsp_transport' with argument 'udp'.
  
  Reading option '-i' ... matched as input url with argument 'rtsp://onvif:bridge@localhost:554/live/41cf4f34-e137-4559-8278-47d912c64c5b'.
  
  Reading option '-tune' ... matched as AVOption 'tune' with argument 'zerolatency'.
  
  Reading option '-vcodec' ... matched as option 'vcodec' (force video codec ('copy' to copy stream)) with argument 'libx264'.
  
  Reading option '-pix_fmt' ... matched as option 'pix_fmt' (set pixel format) with argument '+'.
  
  Reading option '-c:v' ... matched as option 'c' (codec name) with argument 'copy'.
  
  Reading option '-c:a' ... matched as option 'c' (codec name) with argument 'aac'.
  
  Reading option '-strict' ...Routing option strict to both codec and muxer layer
  
   matched as AVOption 'strict' with argument 'experimental'.
  
  Reading option '-f' ... matched as option 'f' (force format) with argument 'flv'.
  
  Reading option 'rtmp://x.rtmp.youtube.com/live2/xxxxxxxx' ... matched as output url.
  
  Reading option '-loglevel' ... matched as option 'loglevel' (set logging level) with argument 'debug'.
  
  Finished splitting the commandline.
  
  Parsing a group of options: global .
  
  Applying option loglevel (set logging level) with argument debug.
  
  Successfully parsed a group of options.
  
  Parsing a group of options: input url anullsrc.
  
  Applying option f (force format) with argument lavfi.
  
  Successfully parsed a group of options.
  
  Opening an input file: anullsrc.
  
  detected 8 logical cores
  
  [AVFilterGraph @ 0000027a34bad7c0] query_formats: 2 queried, 3 merged, 0 already done, 0 delayed
  
  [Parsed_anullsrc_0 @ 0000027a34badb80] sample_rate:44100 channel_layout:'stereo' nb_samples:1024
  
  [lavfi @ 0000027a34babc80] All info found
  
  Input #0, lavfi, from 'anullsrc':
  
    Duration: N/A, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 705 kb/s
  
      Stream #0:0, 1, 1/44100: Audio: pcm_u8, 44100 Hz, stereo, u8, 705 kb/s
  
  Successfully opened the file.
  
  Parsing a group of options: input url rtsp://onvif:bridge@localhost:554/live/41cf4f34-e137-4559-8278-47d912c64c5b.
  
  Successfully parsed a group of options.
  
  Opening an input file: rtsp://onvif:bridge@localhost:554/live/41cf4f34-e137-4559-8278-47d912c64c5b.
  
  [tcp @ 0000027a34bb5980] No default whitelist set

  Edit :
  I’m getting this result with minimal args :