Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (9250)

• How to write UI tests for your plugin – Introducing the Piwik Platform

  18 février 2015, par Thomas Steur — Development

  This is the next post of our blog series where we introduce the capabilities of the Piwik platform (our previous post was How to write unit tests for your plugin). This time you’ll learn how to write UI tests in Piwik. For this tutorial you will need to have basic knowledge of JavaScript and the Piwik platform.

  What is a UI test ?

  Some might know a UI test under the term ‘CSS test’ or ‘screenshot test’. When we speak of UI tests we mean automated tests that capture a screenshot of a URL and then compare the result with an expected image. If the images are not exactly the same the test will fail. For more information read our blog post about UI Testing.

  What is a UI test good for ?

  We use them to test our PHP Controllers, Twig templates, CSS, and indirectly test our JavaScript. We do usually not write Unit or Integration tests for our controllers. For example we use UI tests to ensure that the installation, the login and the update process works as expected. We also have tests for most pages, reports, settings, etc. This increases the quality of our product and saves us a lot of time as it is easy to write and maintain such tests. All UI tests are executed on Travis after each commit and compared with our expected screenshots.

  Getting started

  In this post, we assume that you have already installed Piwik 2.11.0 or later via git, set up your development environment and created a plugin. If not, visit the Piwik Developer Zone where you’ll find the tutorial Setting up Piwik and other Guides that help you to develop a plugin.

  Next you need to install the needed packages to execute UI tests.

  Let’s create a UI test

  We start by using the Piwik Console to create a new UI test :

  ./console generate:test --testtype ui

  The command will ask you to enter the name of the plugin the created test should belong to. I will use the plugin name “Widgetize”. Next it will ask you for the name of the test. Here you usually enter the name of the page or report you want to test. I will use the name “WidgetizePage” in this example. There should now be a file plugins/Widgetize/tests/UI/WidgetizePage_spec.js which contains already an example to get you started easily :

  describe("WidgetizePage", function () {
  
      var generalParams = 'idSite=1&period=day&date=2010-01-03';
  
  
  
      it('should load a simple page by its module and action', function (done) {
  
          var screenshotName = 'simplePage';
  
          // will save image in "processed-ui-screenshots/WidgetizePageTest_simplePage.png"
  
  
  
          expect.screenshot(screenshotName).to.be.capture(function (page) {
  
              var urlToTest = "?" + generalParams + "&module=Widgetize&action=index";
  
              page.load(urlToTest);
  
          }, done);
  
      });
  
  });

  What is happening here ?

  This example declares a new set of specs by calling the method describe(name, callback) and within that a new spec by calling the method it(description, func). Within the spec we load a URL and once loaded capture a screenshot of the whole page. The captured screenshot will be saved under the defined screenshotName. You might have noticed we write our UI tests in BDD style.

  Capturing only a part of the page

  It is good practice to not always capture the full page. For example many pages contain a menu and if you change that menu, all your screenshot tests would fail. To avoid this you would instead have a separate test for your menu. To capture only a part of the page simply specify a jQuery selector and call the method captureSelector instead of capture :

  var contentSelector = '#selector1, .selector2 .selector3';
  
  // Only the content of both selectors will be in visible in the captured screenshot
  
  expect.screenshot('page_partial').to.be.captureSelector(contentSelector, function (page) {
  
      page.load(urlToTest);
  
  }, done);

  Hiding content

  There is a known issue with sparklines that can fail tests randomly. Also version numbers or a date that changes from time to time can fail tests without actually having an error. To avoid this you can prevent elements from being visible in the captured screenshot via CSS as we add a CSS class called uiTest to the HTML element while tests are running.

  .uiTest .version { visibility:hidden }

  Running a test

  To run the previously generated tests we will use the command tests:run-ui :

  ./console tests:run-ui WidgetizePage

  After running the tests for the first time you will notice a new folder plugins/PLUGINNAME/tests/UI/processed-ui-screenshots in your plugin. If everything worked, there will be an image for every captured screenshot. If you’re happy with the result it is time to copy the file over to the expected-ui-screenshots folder, otherwise you have to adjust your test until you get the result you want. From now on, the newly captured screenshots will be compared with the expected images whenever you execute the tests.

  Fixing a test

  At some point your UI test will fail, for example due to expected CSS changes. To fix a test all you have to do is to copy the captured screenshot from the folder processed-ui-screenshots to the folder expected-ui-screenshots.

  Executing the UI tests on Travis

  In case you have not generated a .travis.yml file for your plugin yet you can do this by executing the following command :

  ./console generate:travis-yml --plugin PLUGINNAME

  Next you have to activate Travis for your repository.

  Advanced features

  Isn’t it easy to create a UI test ? We never even created a file ! Of course you can accomplish even more if you want. For example you can specify a fixture to be inserted before running the tests which is useful when your plugin requires custom data. You can also control the browser as it was a human by clicking, moving the mouse, typing text, etc. If you want to discover more features have a look at our existing test cases.

  If you have any feedback regarding our APIs or our guides in the Developer Zone feel free to send it to us.

• How to write UI tests for your plugin – Introducing the Piwik Platform

  18 février 2015, par Thomas Steur — Development

  This is the next post of our blog series where we introduce the capabilities of the Piwik platform (our previous post was How to write unit tests for your plugin). This time you’ll learn how to write UI tests in Piwik. For this tutorial you will need to have basic knowledge of JavaScript and the Piwik platform.

  What is a UI test ?

  Some might know a UI test under the term ‘CSS test’ or ‘screenshot test’. When we speak of UI tests we mean automated tests that capture a screenshot of a URL and then compare the result with an expected image. If the images are not exactly the same the test will fail. For more information read our blog post about UI Testing.

  What is a UI test good for ?

  We use them to test our PHP Controllers, Twig templates, CSS, and indirectly test our JavaScript. We do usually not write Unit or Integration tests for our controllers. For example we use UI tests to ensure that the installation, the login and the update process works as expected. We also have tests for most pages, reports, settings, etc. This increases the quality of our product and saves us a lot of time as it is easy to write and maintain such tests. All UI tests are executed on Travis after each commit and compared with our expected screenshots.

  Getting started

  In this post, we assume that you have already installed Piwik 2.11.0 or later via git, set up your development environment and created a plugin. If not, visit the Piwik Developer Zone where you’ll find the tutorial Setting up Piwik and other Guides that help you to develop a plugin.

  Next you need to install the needed packages to execute UI tests.

  Let’s create a UI test

  We start by using the Piwik Console to create a new UI test :

  ./console generate:test --testtype ui

  The command will ask you to enter the name of the plugin the created test should belong to. I will use the plugin name “Widgetize”. Next it will ask you for the name of the test. Here you usually enter the name of the page or report you want to test. I will use the name “WidgetizePage” in this example. There should now be a file plugins/Widgetize/tests/UI/WidgetizePage_spec.js which contains already an example to get you started easily :

  describe("WidgetizePage", function () {
  
      var generalParams = 'idSite=1&period=day&date=2010-01-03';
  
  
  
      it('should load a simple page by its module and action', function (done) {
  
          var screenshotName = 'simplePage';
  
          // will save image in "processed-ui-screenshots/WidgetizePageTest_simplePage.png"
  
  
  
          expect.screenshot(screenshotName).to.be.capture(function (page) {
  
              var urlToTest = "?" + generalParams + "&module=Widgetize&action=index";
  
              page.load(urlToTest);
  
          }, done);
  
      });
  
  });

  What is happening here ?

  This example declares a new set of specs by calling the method describe(name, callback) and within that a new spec by calling the method it(description, func). Within the spec we load a URL and once loaded capture a screenshot of the whole page. The captured screenshot will be saved under the defined screenshotName. You might have noticed we write our UI tests in BDD style.

  Capturing only a part of the page

  It is good practice to not always capture the full page. For example many pages contain a menu and if you change that menu, all your screenshot tests would fail. To avoid this you would instead have a separate test for your menu. To capture only a part of the page simply specify a jQuery selector and call the method captureSelector instead of capture :

  var contentSelector = '#selector1, .selector2 .selector3';
  
  // Only the content of both selectors will be in visible in the captured screenshot
  
  expect.screenshot('page_partial').to.be.captureSelector(contentSelector, function (page) {
  
      page.load(urlToTest);
  
  }, done);

  Hiding content

  There is a known issue with sparklines that can fail tests randomly. Also version numbers or a date that changes from time to time can fail tests without actually having an error. To avoid this you can prevent elements from being visible in the captured screenshot via CSS as we add a CSS class called uiTest to the HTML element while tests are running.

  .uiTest .version { visibility:hidden }

  Running a test

  To run the previously generated tests we will use the command tests:run-ui :

  ./console tests:run-ui WidgetizePage

  After running the tests for the first time you will notice a new folder plugins/PLUGINNAME/tests/UI/processed-ui-screenshots in your plugin. If everything worked, there will be an image for every captured screenshot. If you’re happy with the result it is time to copy the file over to the expected-ui-screenshots folder, otherwise you have to adjust your test until you get the result you want. From now on, the newly captured screenshots will be compared with the expected images whenever you execute the tests.

  Fixing a test

  At some point your UI test will fail, for example due to expected CSS changes. To fix a test all you have to do is to copy the captured screenshot from the folder processed-ui-screenshots to the folder expected-ui-screenshots.

  Executing the UI tests on Travis

  In case you have not generated a .travis.yml file for your plugin yet you can do this by executing the following command :

  ./console generate:travis-yml --plugin PLUGINNAME

  Next you have to activate Travis for your repository.

  Advanced features

  Isn’t it easy to create a UI test ? We never even created a file ! Of course you can accomplish even more if you want. For example you can specify a fixture to be inserted before running the tests which is useful when your plugin requires custom data. You can also control the browser as it was a human by clicking, moving the mouse, typing text, etc. If you want to discover more features have a look at our existing test cases.

  If you have any feedback regarding our APIs or our guides in the Developer Zone feel free to send it to us.

• Death of A Micro Center

  21 septembre 2012, par Multimedia Mike — History

  The Micro Center computer store located in Santa Clara, CA, USA closed recently :

  
  
  

  I liked Micro Center. I have liked Micro Center ever since I first visited their Denver, CO location 10 years ago. I would sometimes drive an hour in each direction just to visit that shop. I was excited to see that they had a location in the Bay Area when I moved here a few years ago (despite the preponderance of Fry’s stores).

  Now this location is gone. I wonder how much of the “we couldn’t come to favorable terms on a lease” was true (vs. an excuse to close a retail store at a time when more business is moving online, particularly in the heart of Silicon Valley). But that’s not what I wanted to discuss. I came here to discuss…

  The Micro Center Window Logos

  The craziest part about shopping the Santa Clara Micro Center location was the logos they displayed on the window outside. Every time I saw it, it made me sentimental for a time when some of these logos were current, or when some of these companies were still in business. Some of the logos on their front window were for companies I’ve never heard of. It reminds me of the nearby 7-11 convenience stores when I was growing up– their walls were decorated with people sporting embarrassingly 1970s styles long after the 1970s had transpired.

  I thought I would record what those front window logos were and try to pinpoint when the store launched exactly (assuming the logos have been their since the initial opening and never changed).

  
  
  Click for larger image
  

  Here we have Lotus, Hewlett Packard/HP, Corel, Fuji, Power Macintosh, NEC, and Fujitsu. Lotus was purchased by IBM in 1995 and still seems to be maintained as a separate brand. The Power Macintosh was introduced as a brand in 1994. Corel’s logo has seen a few mutations over the years but I don’t know when this one fell out of favor.

  Fuji (vs. Fujitsu) appears to refer to Fujifilm, though this logo is also obsolete.

  
  
  Click for larger image
  

  Hayes– I specifically remember reading the Slashdot post accouncing that Hayes is dead (followed by many comments reminiscing about the Hayes command set). Here is the post, from early 1999.

  From Googling, it doesn’t appear IBM still has a presence in the consumer computing space (though they do have something pertaining to software for consumer products). Then there’s the good old rainbow Apple logo, something that went away in 1997. I suspect 1997 was also the last hurrah of the name ‘Macintosh’ (though I remember mistakenly referring to Apple computer products as Macintoshes well into the mid-2000s and inadvertently angering some Apple enthusiasts).

  
  
  Click for larger image
  

  As for the next segment, obviously, both Sony and Toshiba are still very much alive. Iomega was acquired by EMC in 2008 but is still maintained as a separate brand. USRobotics is still around and making — what else ? — 56K modems (and their current logo is slightly different than the one seen here).

  Targus seems to be a case maker (“Leading Provider of Cases, Bags and Accessories for Laptops and Tablets”). I wonder if that’s just their current business or if they had more areas long ago ? It seems strange that they would get brand billing like this.

  Finally, searching for information about Practical Peripherals only produces sites about how they’re long dead (like this history lesson). It’s unclear when they died.

  The interior of this store was also decorated with more technology company logos near the ceiling (I didn’t really register that fact until I had visited many times). Regrettably, I now won’t be able to see how up to date those logos were.

  Based on the data points above, it’s safe to conclude that the store opened between 1995 or 1996 (again, assuming the logos were placed at opening and never changed).

  Epilogue

  Here’s one more curious item still visible from the outside :

  
  
  

  “See the world’s fastest PC !” Featuring an Intel Core 2 Extreme ? That CPU dates back to 2007 and was succeeded by Nehalem in late 2008. So even that sign, which is presumably easier and cleaner to replace than the window logos, was absurdly out of date.