
Recherche avancée
Médias (91)
-
Spitfire Parade - Crisis
15 mai 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Wired NextMusic
14 mai 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2012
Langue : English
Type : Video
-
Video d’abeille en portrait
14 mai 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2012
Langue : français
Type : Video
-
Sintel MP4 Surround 5.1 Full
13 mai 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2012
Langue : English
Type : Video
-
Carte de Schillerkiez
13 mai 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Texte
-
Publier une image simplement
13 avril 2011, par ,
Mis à jour : Février 2012
Langue : français
Type : Video
Autres articles (97)
-
MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version
25 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...) -
HTML5 audio and video support
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...) -
ANNEXE : Les plugins utilisés spécifiquement pour la ferme
5 mars 2010, parLe site central/maître de la ferme a besoin d’utiliser plusieurs plugins supplémentaires vis à vis des canaux pour son bon fonctionnement. le plugin Gestion de la mutualisation ; le plugin inscription3 pour gérer les inscriptions et les demandes de création d’instance de mutualisation dès l’inscription des utilisateurs ; le plugin verifier qui fournit une API de vérification des champs (utilisé par inscription3) ; le plugin champs extras v2 nécessité par inscription3 (...)
Sur d’autres sites (8824)
-
Extracting subclip from a .webm file with ffmpeg [migrated]
19 juin 2013, par user815423426I am trying to extract a subclip from a
webm
file and write to anmp4
fil. I have the following command line :ffmpeg -ss 560 -i input.webm -ss 20 -t 46 -acodec copy -vcodec copy output.mp4
but I get the following error :
ffmpeg version 1.2 Copyright (c) 2000-2013 the FFmpeg developers
built on Mar 22 2013 10:42:11 with gcc 4.7.2 (GCC)
configuration: --prefix=/path/to/installations --enable-shared --enable-gpl --en
able-nonfree --enable-version3 --enable-libx264
libavutil 52. 18.100 / 52. 18.100
libavcodec 54. 92.100 / 54. 92.100
libavformat 54. 63.104 / 54. 63.104
libavdevice 54. 3.103 / 54. 3.103
libavfilter 3. 42.103 / 3. 42.103
libswscale 2. 2.100 / 2. 2.100
libswresample 0. 17.102 / 0. 17.102
libpostproc 52. 2.100 / 52. 2.100
Input #0, matroska,webm, from '/path/to/input.webm':
Duration: 01:13:20.32, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 2006 kb/s
Stream #0:0(eng): Video: vp8, yuv420p, 640x480, SAR 1:1 DAR 4:3, 30 fp,
30 tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbc (default)
Stream #0:1(eng): Audio: vorbis, 44100 Hz, stereo, fltp (default)
[mp4 @ 0x1493c340] track 0: could not find tag, codec not currently support
ed in container
Output #0, mp4, to '/path/to/output.mp4':
Metadata:
encoder : Lavf54.63.104
Stream #0:0(eng): Video: vp8, yuv420p, 640x480 [SAR 1:1 DAR 4:3], q=2-3
1, 30 fps, 90k tbn, 1k tbc (default)
Stream #0:1(eng): Audio: vorbis ([221][0][0][0] / 0x00DD), 44100 Hz, st
ereo (default)
Stream mapping:
Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (copy)
Stream #0:1 -> #0:1 (copy)
Could not write header for output file #0 (incorrect codec parameters ?): O
peration not permittedThe strange thing is that the following works well for extracting files from
mp4
tomp4
ffmpeg -ss 560 -i input.mp4 -ss 20 -t 46 -acodec copy -vcodec copy output.mp4
-
Making Sure The PNG Gets There
14 juin 2013, par Multimedia Mike — GeneralRewind to 1999. I was developing an HTTP-based remote management interface for an embedded device. The device sat on an ethernet LAN and you could point a web browser at it. The pitch was to transmit an image of the device’s touch screen and the user could click on the picture to interact with the device. So we needed an image format. If you were computing at the time, you know that the web was insufferably limited back then. Our choice basically came down to GIF and JPEG. Being the office’s annoying free software zealot, I was championing a little known up and coming format named PNG.
So the challenge was to create our own PNG encoder (incorporating a library like libpng wasn’t an option for this platform). I seem to remember being annoyed at having to implement an integrity check (CRC) for the PNG encoder. It’s part of the PNG spec, after all. It just seemed so redundant. At the time, I reasoned that there were 5 layers of integrity validation in play.
I don’t know why, but I was reflecting on this episode recently and decided to revisit it. Here are all the encapsulation layers of a PNG file when flung over an ethernet network :
So there are up to 5 encapsulations for the data in this situation. At the innermost level is the image data which is compressed with the zlib DEFLATE method. At first, I thought that this also had a CRC or checksum. However, in researching this post, I couldn’t find any evidence of such an integrity check. Further, I don’t think we bothered to compress the PNG data in this project long ago. It was a small image, monochrome, and transferring via LAN, so the encoder could get away with signaling uncompressed data.
The graphical data gets wrapped up in a PNG chunk and all PNG chunks have a CRC. To transmit via the network, it goes into a TCP frame, which also has a checksum. That goes into an IP packet. I previously believed that this represented another integrity check. While an IP frame does have a checksum, the checksum only covers the IP header and not the payload. So that doesn’t really count towards this goal.
Finally, the data gets encapsulated into an ethernet frame which has — you guessed it — a CRC.
I see that other link layer protocols like PPP and wireless ethernet (802.11) also feature frame CRCs. So I guess what I’m saying is that, if you transfer a PNG file over the network, you can be confident that the data will be free of any errors.
-
Concat two mp4 files with ffmpeg without losing quality [migrated]
13 juin 2013, par jeniai have now a problem with concatenating of 2 videos using ffmpeg.
So, i am encoding the source mp4 files to ts withffmpeg -i output1.mp4 -scodec copy -vbsf h264_mp4toannexb i0.ts
but the file i get looks much worse, then the source file.
here is the information about both the files
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'output1.mp4':
Metadata:
major_brand : isom
minor_version : 1
compatible_brands: isom
creation_time : 2013-06-13 15:40:36
Duration: 00:00:15.72, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 2053 kb/s
Stream #0.0(und): Video: h264 (High), yuv420p, 1280x720, 1931 kb/s, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 12800 tbn, 50 tbc
Stream #0.1(und): Audio: aac, 44100 Hz, stereo, s16, 128 kb/s
Input #0, mpegts, from 'i0.ts':
Duration: 00:00:15.64, start: 1.400000, bitrate: 1382 kb/s
Program 1
Metadata:
service_name : Service01
service_provider: Libav
Stream #0.0[0x100]: Video: mpeg2video (Main), yuv420p, 1280x720 [PAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 104857 kb/s, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 90k tbn, 50 tbc
Stream #0.1[0x101](und): Audio: mp2, 44100 Hz, stereo, s16, 128 kb/sSo, how can i solve this problem ?
Thanks in advance !