
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Publier une image simplement
13 avril 2011, par ,
Mis à jour : Février 2012
Langue : français
Type : Video
Autres articles (46)
-
Installation en mode ferme
4 février 2011, parLe mode ferme permet d’héberger plusieurs sites de type MediaSPIP en n’installant qu’une seule fois son noyau fonctionnel.
C’est la méthode que nous utilisons sur cette même plateforme.
L’utilisation en mode ferme nécessite de connaïtre un peu le mécanisme de SPIP contrairement à la version standalone qui ne nécessite pas réellement de connaissances spécifique puisque l’espace privé habituel de SPIP n’est plus utilisé.
Dans un premier temps, vous devez avoir installé les mêmes fichiers que l’installation (...) -
Multilang : améliorer l’interface pour les blocs multilingues
18 février 2011, parMultilang est un plugin supplémentaire qui n’est pas activé par défaut lors de l’initialisation de MediaSPIP.
Après son activation, une préconfiguration est mise en place automatiquement par MediaSPIP init permettant à la nouvelle fonctionnalité d’être automatiquement opérationnelle. Il n’est donc pas obligatoire de passer par une étape de configuration pour cela. -
Configuration spécifique d’Apache
4 février 2011, parModules spécifiques
Pour la configuration d’Apache, il est conseillé d’activer certains modules non spécifiques à MediaSPIP, mais permettant d’améliorer les performances : mod_deflate et mod_headers pour compresser automatiquement via Apache les pages. Cf ce tutoriel ; mode_expires pour gérer correctement l’expiration des hits. Cf ce tutoriel ;
Il est également conseillé d’ajouter la prise en charge par apache du mime-type pour les fichiers WebM comme indiqué dans ce tutoriel.
Création d’un (...)
Sur d’autres sites (6783)
-
Adding Documentation of a library to manual pages
30 juin 2017, par jsp99I am working with Ubuntu 12.04.1 . I am learning to make a basic video player using FFmpeg library in C . My manual pages don’t show any entries for the headers/functions of the library . Can someone please show me a way to add the documentation to my manual pages .
It is much easy to search that way than searching on a web page everytime .PS : I have tried to add documentation to man pages using Synaptic package manager . I installed a ffmpeg-doc package . But it doesn’t seem to work .
Thanks .
-
ffmpeg capture output from child window
3 janvier 2013, par glitchymeusing
xwininfo -all
I'm able to see the stats of any window, along with its child windowsxwininfo: Window id: 0x3c000ba "Electro - The Slag & Prototype Raptor - Crescendo - YouTube - Mozilla Firefox"
Root window id: 0xa8 (the root window) (has no name)
Parent window id: 0xc001b8 (has no name)
2 children:
0x3c00175 (has no name): () 1388x876+0+0 +52+24
5 children:
0x3d210ab (has no name): () 854x510+225+197 +277+221
1 child:
0x3d210ac (has no name): () 854x510+0+0 +277+221
1 child:
0x40404de "plugin-container": ("plugin-container" "Plugin-container") 854x510+0+0 +277+221
2 children:
0x40404e1 (has no name): () 854x510+0+0 +277+221
0x40404df (has no name): () 1x1+-1+-1 +276+220
0x3ddbcf2 (has no name): () 640x390+225+162 +277+186
1 child:
0x3ddbcf3 (has no name): () 640x390+0+0 +277+186
1 child:
0x403d545 "plugin-container": ("plugin-container" "Plugin-container") 640x390+0+0 +277+186
2 children:
0x403d548 (has no name): () 640x390+0+0 +277+186
0x403d546 (has no name): () 1x1+-1+-1 +276+185
0x3dac7f9 (has no name): () 640x390+225+162 +277+186
1 child:
0x3dac7fa (has no name): () 640x390+0+0 +277+186
1 child:
0x4039d8b "plugin-container": ("plugin-container" "Plugin-container") 640x390+0+0 +277+186
2 children:
0x4039d8e (has no name): () 640x390+0+0 +277+186
0x4039d8c (has no name): () 1x1+-1+-1 +276+185
0x3c3f939 (has no name): () 640x390+225+197 +277+221
1 child:
0x3c3f93a (has no name): () 640x390+0+0 +277+221
1 child:
0x4011918 "plugin-container": ("plugin-container" "Plugin-container") 640x390+0+0 +277+221
2 children:
0x401191b (has no name): () 640x390+0+0 +277+221
0x4011919 (has no name): () 1x1+-1+-1 +276+220
0x3c0d1dc (has no name): () 1x1+0+97 +52+121
1 child:
0x3c0d1dd (has no name): () 1x1+0+0 +52+121
1 child:
0x4002c1e "plugin-container": ("plugin-container" "Plugin-container") 1x1+0+0 +52+121
2 children:
0x4002c40 (has no name): () 1x1+0+0 +52+121
0x4002c1f (has no name): () 1x1+-1+-1 +51+120
0x3c000bb (has no name): () 1x1+-1+-1 +51+23
Absolute upper-left X: 52
Absolute upper-left Y: 24
Relative upper-left X: 0
Relative upper-left Y: 0
Width: 1388
Height: 876
Depth: 24
Visual: 0x23
Visual Class: TrueColor
Border width: 0
Class: InputOutput
Colormap: 0x20 (installed)
Bit Gravity State: NorthWestGravity
Window Gravity State: NorthWestGravity
Backing Store State: NotUseful
Save Under State: no
Map State: IsViewable
Override Redirect State: no
Corners: +52+24 -0+24 -0-0 ç0
-geometry 1388x876-0-0
Bit gravity: NorthWestGravity
Window gravity: NorthWestGravity
Backing-store hint: NotUseful
Backing-planes to be preserved: 0xffffffff
Backing pixel: 0
Save-unders: No
Someone wants these events:
KeyPress
KeyRelease
ButtonPress
ButtonRelease
EnterWindow
LeaveWindow
PointerMotion
Exposure
VisibilityChange
StructureNotify
FocusChange
PropertyChange
Do not propagate these events:
Override redirection?: No
Window manager hints:
Client accepts input or input focus: Yes
Initial state is Normal State
Displayed on desktop 0
Window type:
Normal
Window state:
Maximized Vert
Maximized Horz
Process id: 4087 on host jb
Frame extents: 0, 0, 0, 0
Normal window size hints:
Program supplied minimum size: 18 by 97
Program supplied maximum size: 1073741824 by 1073741824
Program supplied window gravity: NorthWestGravity
No zoom window size hints defined
No window shape defined
No border shape definedHowever, if I try capturing from the screen given the size and offset of the child window, then I risk losing data when another window floats ontop of it, I switch to another tab while recording, I resize the child window, or move the child window. Instead, I'd like to use ffmpeg to capture from specifically that child window.
Ideas ? Tips ? Maybe some other hacks to accomplish this ? Thanks :)
-
Making Sure The PNG Gets There
14 juin 2013, par Multimedia Mike — GeneralRewind to 1999. I was developing an HTTP-based remote management interface for an embedded device. The device sat on an ethernet LAN and you could point a web browser at it. The pitch was to transmit an image of the device’s touch screen and the user could click on the picture to interact with the device. So we needed an image format. If you were computing at the time, you know that the web was insufferably limited back then. Our choice basically came down to GIF and JPEG. Being the office’s annoying free software zealot, I was championing a little known up and coming format named PNG.
So the challenge was to create our own PNG encoder (incorporating a library like libpng wasn’t an option for this platform). I seem to remember being annoyed at having to implement an integrity check (CRC) for the PNG encoder. It’s part of the PNG spec, after all. It just seemed so redundant. At the time, I reasoned that there were 5 layers of integrity validation in play.
I don’t know why, but I was reflecting on this episode recently and decided to revisit it. Here are all the encapsulation layers of a PNG file when flung over an ethernet network :
So there are up to 5 encapsulations for the data in this situation. At the innermost level is the image data which is compressed with the zlib DEFLATE method. At first, I thought that this also had a CRC or checksum. However, in researching this post, I couldn’t find any evidence of such an integrity check. Further, I don’t think we bothered to compress the PNG data in this project long ago. It was a small image, monochrome, and transferring via LAN, so the encoder could get away with signaling uncompressed data.
The graphical data gets wrapped up in a PNG chunk and all PNG chunks have a CRC. To transmit via the network, it goes into a TCP frame, which also has a checksum. That goes into an IP packet. I previously believed that this represented another integrity check. While an IP frame does have a checksum, the checksum only covers the IP header and not the payload. So that doesn’t really count towards this goal.
Finally, the data gets encapsulated into an ethernet frame which has — you guessed it — a CRC.
I see that other link layer protocols like PPP and wireless ethernet (802.11) also feature frame CRCs. So I guess what I’m saying is that, if you transfer a PNG file over the network, you can be confident that the data will be free of any errors.