Recherche avancée
Autres articles (60)
-
La file d’attente de SPIPmotion
28 novembre 2010, parUne file d’attente stockée dans la base de donnée
Lors de son installation, SPIPmotion crée une nouvelle table dans la base de donnée intitulée spip_spipmotion_attentes.
Cette nouvelle table est constituée des champs suivants : id_spipmotion_attente, l’identifiant numérique unique de la tâche à traiter ; id_document, l’identifiant numérique du document original à encoder ; id_objet l’identifiant unique de l’objet auquel le document encodé devra être attaché automatiquement ; objet, le type d’objet auquel (...) -
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...) -
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir
Sur d’autres sites (11168)
-
Merging .flv chunks from stream site
4 décembre 2016, par IztooiI’m trying to download a video from an alternative version of the Ustream site. This site is apparently used for a DRM protection, in fact you can’t watch this video without having access to it through a login from this site.
The video system should be the same used by ustream (same links), that is calling different flv chunks every x seconds and merging them into the stream (similar to an rtmp service, but it doesn’t use this protocol).I managed to download every .flv chunks composing this video, but i had issues on merging them into a single file. First of all these flvs files have some audio/video lags/problems, but since there is no other way to download this video i’m not complaining about lags.
The real issue is that every flv file has an additive increase on the duration, despite having a normal size. Video duration is about 6 seconds, so the first chunk is 6 seconds long, the second chunk is 12 seconds long, although only the first 6 are visible (the remaining 6 are "corrupted"). If i try to merge (with ffmpeg or any video-joining software) all these files (about 600-700, for a total duration of 1 hour and 15 minutes) only the first two sections are visible, then I cannot see anything. (Being more clear, if i try to merge the first 2 chunks, file is 18 seconds long and i can see the first 12 ; if i try to merge the first 3 chunks, file is 36 seconds long and i can still only see the first 12 seconds.)
Anyone has any idea ?
-
videostreaming in java with bytedeco maven dependencies
22 octobre 2020, par faenschiwe try to setup a videostreamig service in java. our applications runs in a docker container on openshift. therefore we install ffmpeg in the dockerfile.


in java we use the bytedeco maven dependencies. but i'm really not sure which dependency version runs with which ffmpeg version installed in the container. is there somewhere a overview ? does anybody have a similar setup ?


at the moment we use the 1.5.4 maven dependencies and ffmpgen v4.3.1 in the container :


<dependency>
 <groupid>org.bytedeco</groupid>
 <artifactid>javacv-platform</artifactid>
 <version>1.5.4</version>
 </dependency>

 <dependency>
 <groupid>org.bytedeco</groupid>
 <artifactid>javacpp-platform</artifactid>
 <version>1.5.4</version>
 </dependency>

 
 <dependency>
 <groupid>org.bytedeco</groupid>
 <artifactid>ffmpeg-platform</artifactid>
 <version>4.3.1-1.5.4</version>
 </dependency>


this does not work. the pod crashes as soon as i start the streaming. if i use ffmpeg v 3.x with a older centos base image and the dependency above the pod does not crash..but the streaming does not work either.


any help appreciated
angela


-
Is there an effective and cheap/free way to host video for a mobile app that must be approved by an admin before going live ? [on hold]
9 août 2013, par user2658775We are building a mobile app for the iOS and Android operating systems. The app is to be a communication platform for members within an organization. Content is generated by users and submitted to the admin. Once approved by the admin the content is pushed to the app. One feature of the app is the ability to upload video.
We are having a tough time attempting to figure out the best way to do this. Because the app will be representing the organization, the organization must have control over the approval process.
So far we have come up with the following options :
Option 1 : purchase a dedicated server from hosting service provider. The basic package with Blue host is $150/month which is fairly expensive.
Option 2 : have the users post to YouTube using their personal accounts. Upon posting to YouTube (via the app) the app would send a notification to the admin that a new video has been posted. Admin would review the video and if acceptable admin would user url link to post video to app. This option, while free, requires many steps that will bog down the submittal process.
Does anyone know of an effective way to post video to an app that requires approval by an admin ?
Syndiquer tout le site
