Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/utilisateurs

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (92)

  • L’utiliser, en parler, le critiquer

    10 avril 2011

    La première attitude à adopter est d’en parler, soit directement avec les personnes impliquées dans son développement, soit autour de vous pour convaincre de nouvelles personnes à l’utiliser.
    Plus la communauté sera nombreuse et plus les évolutions seront rapides ...
    Une liste de discussion est disponible pour tout échange entre utilisateurs.

  • Websites made ​​with MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    This page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.

  • Use, discuss, criticize

    13 avril 2011, par

    Talk to people directly involved in MediaSPIP’s development, or to people around you who could use MediaSPIP to share, enhance or develop their creative projects.
    The bigger the community, the more MediaSPIP’s potential will be explored and the faster the software will evolve.
    A discussion list is available for all exchanges between users.

Sur d’autres sites (10870)

  • What's the difference with crf and qp in ffmpeg ?

    18 novembre 2016, par Nova

    After browsing around Google, I’ve came across this page about h264 encoding and discovered about qp. https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.264

    My questions are : What are the differences with crf and qp ? Is it better to use qp over crf overall, or is it only if for using qp 0 for best lossless ? Does qp have a known sensible setting if it’s preferred ? So far, I know crf has the default value of 23 while 18 is a sensible preferred increase in quality, although I don’t understand why 18 wouldn’t be default if better sensible lossless. Lastly, would changing either of them cause incompatibility with non-ffmpeg players or just qp ?

    I’m converting from webm to mp4 by the way.

    I was going to test crf 23 and 18 and pick which is best but I can’t seem to find any concrete information on this comparison or about qp.

  • avformat/movenc : Check first DTS similar to dts difference

    9 septembre 2016, par Michael Niedermayer
    avformat/movenc : Check first DTS similar to dts difference
    

    Fixes assertion failure
    Fixes : b84b53855a0b74560e64c6f45f505a13/signal_sigabrt_7ffff6ae7c37_3837_ef4e243ea5b4fa8d0becf4afe9166604.avi

    Found-by : Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind
    Signed-off-by : Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>

    • [DH] libavformat/movenc.c
  • Difference between ffmpeg and avconv for rawvideo image2pipe

    15 août 2016, par NHDaly

    I’m not sure why, but avconv does not seem to be piping raw video like I would expect.

    I’m trying pipe a video from ffmpeg into python (eventually I want to read from x11grab, not a video file). It works just fine on my Macbook using ffmpeg, but when I use avconv on Debian Jessie, the stream cuts off early !

    Here’s my basic python, which is following this guide :

    input_resolution_shape = (1280,800,3)
    input_bytes = reduce(mul, input_resolution_shape, 1)
    print input_bytes

    # Prints 3072000

    import subprocess as sp
    command = [ FFMPEG_BIN,   # This is either "avconv" or "ffmpeg".
               '-i', 'test_video.mp4',
               '-f', 'image2pipe',
               '-pix_fmt', 'rgb24',
               '-vcodec', 'rawvideo', '-']
    pipe = sp.Popen(command, stdout = sp.PIPE, bufsize=10**8)

    import numpy
    for _ in range(100):  # read 100 frames
       # read 1280*800*3 bytes (= 1 frame)
       raw_image = pipe.stdout.read(input_bytes)
       # transform the byte read into a numpy array
       image = numpy.fromstring(raw_image, dtype='uint8')
       if image.size != 0:
           print image.size

           # Prints 1015808

    On the mac, the image.size printed is the same as the input_bytes, 3072000. But on debian, it’s 1015808. Any ideas why that could be happening ?

    Interestingly, 3072000/1015808 is just about 3 :

    In [1]:    3072000./1015808.
    Out[1]:    3.024193548387097