
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (64)
-
Demande de création d’un canal
12 mars 2010, parEn fonction de la configuration de la plateforme, l’utilisateur peu avoir à sa disposition deux méthodes différentes de demande de création de canal. La première est au moment de son inscription, la seconde, après son inscription en remplissant un formulaire de demande.
Les deux manières demandent les mêmes choses fonctionnent à peu près de la même manière, le futur utilisateur doit remplir une série de champ de formulaire permettant tout d’abord aux administrateurs d’avoir des informations quant à (...) -
MediaSPIP v0.2
21 juin 2013, parMediaSPIP 0.2 est la première version de MediaSPIP stable.
Sa date de sortie officielle est le 21 juin 2013 et est annoncée ici.
Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
Comme pour la version précédente, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...) -
MediaSPIP version 0.1 Beta
16 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta est la première version de MediaSPIP décrétée comme "utilisable".
Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
Pour avoir une installation fonctionnelle, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...)
Sur d’autres sites (15424)
-
Video Conferencing in HTML5 : WebRTC via Web Sockets
1er janvier 2014, par silviaA bit over a week ago I gave a presentation at Web Directions Code 2012 in Melbourne. Maxine and John asked me to speak about something related to HTML5 video, so I went for the new shiny : WebRTC – real-time communication in the browser.
I only had 20 min, so I had to make it tight. I wanted to show off video conferencing without special plugins in Google Chrome in just a few lines of code, as is the promise of WebRTC. To a large extent, I achieved this. But I made some interesting discoveries along the way. Demos are in the slide deck.
UPDATE : Opera 12 has been released with WebRTC support.
Housekeeping : if you want to replicate what I have done, you need to install a Google Chrome Web Browser 19+. Then make sure you go to chrome ://flags and activate the MediaStream and PeerConnection experiment(s). Restart your browser and now you can experiment with this feature. Big warning up-front : it’s not production-ready, since there are still changes happening to the spec and there is no compatible implementation by another browser yet.
Here is a brief summary of the steps involved to set up video conferencing in your browser :
- Set up a video element each for the local and the remote video stream.
- Grab the local camera and stream it to the first video element.
- (*) Establish a connection to another person running the same Web page.
- Send the local camera stream on that peer connection.
- Accept the remote camera stream into the second video element.
Now, the most difficult part of all of this – believe it or not – is the signalling part that is required to build the peer connection (marked with (*)). Initially I wanted to run completely without a server and just enter the remote’s IP address to establish the connection. This is, however, not a functionality that the PeerConnection object provides [might this be something to add to the spec ?].
So, you need a server known to both parties that can provide for the handshake to set up the connection. All the examples that I have seen, such as https://apprtc.appspot.com/, use a channel management server on Google’s appengine. I wanted it all working with HTML5 technology, so I decided to use a Web Socket server instead.
I implemented my Web Socket server using node.js (code of websocket server). The video conferencing demo is in the slide deck in an iframe – you can also use the stand-alone html page. Works like a treat.
While it is still using Google’s STUN server to get through NAT, the messaging for setting up the connection is running completely through the Web Socket server. The messages that get exchanged are plain SDP message packets with a session ID. There are OFFER, ANSWER, and OK packets exchanged for each streaming direction. You can see some of it in the below image :
I’m not running a public WebSocket server, so you won’t be able to see this part of the presentation working. But the local loopback video should work.
At the conference, it all went without a hitch (while the wireless played along). I believe you have to host the WebSocket server on the same machine as the Web page, otherwise it won’t work for security reasons.
A whole new world of opportunities lies out there when we get the ability to set up video conferencing on every Web page – scary and exciting at the same time !
-
Video Conferencing in HTML5 : WebRTC via Web Sockets
14 juin 2012, par silviaA bit over a week ago I gave a presentation at Web Directions Code 2012 in Melbourne. Maxine and John asked me to speak about something related to HTML5 video, so I went for the new shiny : WebRTC – real-time communication in the browser.
I only had 20 min, so I had to make it tight. I wanted to show off video conferencing without special plugins in Google Chrome in just a few lines of code, as is the promise of WebRTC. To a large extent, I achieved this. But I made some interesting discoveries along the way. Demos are in the slide deck.
UPDATE : Opera 12 has been released with WebRTC support.
Housekeeping : if you want to replicate what I have done, you need to install a Google Chrome Web Browser 19+. Then make sure you go to chrome ://flags and activate the MediaStream and PeerConnection experiment(s). Restart your browser and now you can experiment with this feature. Big warning up-front : it’s not production-ready, since there are still changes happening to the spec and there is no compatible implementation by another browser yet.
Here is a brief summary of the steps involved to set up video conferencing in your browser :
- Set up a video element each for the local and the remote video stream.
- Grab the local camera and stream it to the first video element.
- (*) Establish a connection to another person running the same Web page.
- Send the local camera stream on that peer connection.
- Accept the remote camera stream into the second video element.
Now, the most difficult part of all of this – believe it or not – is the signalling part that is required to build the peer connection (marked with (*)). Initially I wanted to run completely without a server and just enter the remote’s IP address to establish the connection. This is, however, not a functionality that the PeerConnection object provides [might this be something to add to the spec ?].
So, you need a server known to both parties that can provide for the handshake to set up the connection. All the examples that I have seen, such as https://apprtc.appspot.com/, use a channel management server on Google’s appengine. I wanted it all working with HTML5 technology, so I decided to use a Web Socket server instead.
I implemented my Web Socket server using node.js (code of websocket server). The video conferencing demo is in the slide deck in an iframe – you can also use the stand-alone html page. Works like a treat.
While it is still using Google’s STUN server to get through NAT, the messaging for setting up the connection is running completely through the Web Socket server. The messages that get exchanged are plain SDP message packets with a session ID. There are OFFER, ANSWER, and OK packets exchanged for each streaming direction. You can see some of it in the below image :
I’m not running a public WebSocket server, so you won’t be able to see this part of the presentation working. But the local loopback video should work.
At the conference, it all went without a hitch (while the wireless played along). I believe you have to host the WebSocket server on the same machine as the Web page, otherwise it won’t work for security reasons.
A whole new world of opportunities lies out there when we get the ability to set up video conferencing on every Web page – scary and exciting at the same time !
-
How to get stream info from opened file in ffmpeg ?
31 mai 2013, par Srv19I am trying to read video file using ffmpeg. I had working code that corresponded to somewhat old version of it, and started to try and upgrade to latest build version, exchanging all those deprecated functions for their actual analogues.
However i have run into a problem. No streams seem to be retrieved and the load of video stops dead in tracks.
here is the code i am using :
// Open video file
if(avformat_open_input(&pFormatCtx, filename.toStdString().c_str(), NULL, NULL)!=0)
return FILE_NOT_OPENED; // Couldn't open file
// Retrieve stream information
if(avformat_find_stream_info(pFormatCtx,NULL)<0)
return NO_STREAM_INFO; // Couldn't find stream information
// Dump information about file onto standard error
av_dump_format(pFormatCtx, 0, filename.toStdString().c_str(), false);
// Find the first video stream
videoStream=-1;
for(unsigned i=0; inb_streams; i++)
if(pFormatCtx->streams[i]->codec->codec_type==ffmpeg::AVMEDIA_TYPE_VIDEO)
{
videoStream=i;
break;
}
if(videoStream==-1)
return OTHER; // Didn't find a video stream
// Get a pointer to the codec context for the video stream
pCodecCtx=pFormatCtx->streams[videoStream]->codec;
// Find the decoder for the video stream
pCodec=avcodec_find_decoder(pCodecCtx->codec_id);
if(pCodec==NULL)
return CODEC_NOT_FOUND; // Codec not found
// Open codec
if(avcodec_open2(pCodecCtx, pCodec,NULL)<0)
return CODEC_NOT_OPENED; // Could not open codecThe problem arises in the cycle through video streams in
ffmpeg::AVFormatContext *pFormatCtx
. nb_streams field is 0, and i never actually enter the cycle, and codec is not loaded etc. Strange thing is, av_dump_format gives following output :License: GPL version 3 or later
AVCodec version 3606372
AVFormat configuration: --disable-static --enable-shared --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --disable-w32threads --enable-avisynth --enable-bzlib --enable-fontconfig --enable-frei0r --enable-gnutls --enable-iconv --enable-libass --enable-libbluray --enable-libcaca --enable-libfreetype --enable-libgsm --enable-libilbc --enable-libmodplug --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopus --enable-librtmp --enable-libschroedinger --enable-libsoxr --enable-libspeex --enable-libtheora --enable-libtwolame --enable-libvo-aacenc --enable-libvo-amrwbenc --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-libx264 --enable-libxavs --enable-libxvid --enable-zlib
[asf @ 004e9540] Stream #0: not enough frames to estimate rate; consider increasing probesize
Input #0, asf, from 'C:/Users/Public/Videos/Sample Videos/Wildlife.wmv':
Metadata:
SfOriginalFPS : 299700
WMFSDKVersion : 11.0.6001.7000
WMFSDKNeeded : 0.0.0.0000
comment : Footage: Small World Productions, Inc; Tourism New Zealand | Producer: Gary F. Spradling | Music: Steve Ball
title : Wildlife in HD
copyright : В© 2008 Microsoft Corporation
IsVBR : 0
DeviceConformanceTemplate: AP@L3
Duration: 00:00:30.09, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 6977 kb/s
Stream #0:0(eng): Audio: wmav2 (a[1][0][0] / 0x0161), 44100 Hz, 2 channels, fltp, 192 kb/s
Stream #0:1(eng): Video: vc1 (Advanced) (WVC1 / 0x31435657), yuv420p, 1280x720, 5942 kb/s, 29.97 tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbcand there are 2 streams, clear as day.
I am utterly baffled. Please help.