Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (8083)

• fftools/ffmpeg : add thread-aware transcode scheduling infrastructure

  18 mai 2023, par Anton Khirnov

  fftools/ffmpeg : add thread-aware transcode scheduling infrastructure
  See the comment block at the top of fftools/ffmpeg_sched.h for more
  
  details on what this scheduler is for.
  This commit adds the scheduling code itself, along with minimal
  
  integration with the rest of the program :
  
  * allocating and freeing the scheduler
  
  * passing it throughout the call stack in order to register the
  
    individual components (demuxers/decoders/filtergraphs/encoders/muxers)
  
    with the scheduler
  The scheduler is not actually used as of this commit, so it should not
  
  result in any change in behavior. That will change in future commits.
  

  • [DH] fftools/Makefile
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg.c
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg.h
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_dec.c
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_demux.c
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_enc.c
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_filter.c
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_mux.c
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_mux.h
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_mux_init.c
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_opt.c
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_sched.c
  • [DH] fftools/ffmpeg_sched.h

• fate : Avoid unnecessary pixel format conversions

  30 juin 2015, par Martin Storsjö

  fate : Avoid unnecessary pixel format conversions
  Most of the fate-dds-* and fate-txd-* tests already
  
  output into the same pixel format regardless of
  
  platform endianness, so there’s no need to force
  
  conversion to another format.
  This fixes the tests fate-txd-16bpp, fate-txd-odd,
  
  fate-dds-rgb16, fate-dds-rgb24 and fate-dds-xrgb on
  
  big endian, where the tests seem to fail due to issues
  
  with certain conversion codepaths in swscale.
  Those conversion codepaths should of course be fixed, but
  
  the individual decoder tests should use as little extra
  
  conversion steps as possible.
  Signed-off-by : Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
  

  • [DH] tests/fate/image.mak
  • [DH] tests/fate/video.mak
  • [DH] tests/ref/fate/dds-rgb16
  • [DH] tests/ref/fate/dds-rgb24
  • [DH] tests/ref/fate/dds-uyvy
  • [DH] tests/ref/fate/dds-xbgr
  • [DH] tests/ref/fate/dds-y
  • [DH] tests/ref/fate/dds-ya
  • [DH] tests/ref/fate/dds-yuyv
  • [DH] tests/ref/fate/txd-16bpp
  • [DH] tests/ref/fate/txd-odd

• aarch64 : vp9 : Implement NEON loop filters

  14 novembre 2016, par Martin Storsjö

  aarch64 : vp9 : Implement NEON loop filters
  This work is sponsored by, and copyright, Google.
  These are ported from the ARM version ; thanks to the larger
  
  amount of registers available, we can do the loop filters with
  
  16 pixels at a time. The implementation is fully templated, with
  
  a single macro which can generate versions for both 8 and
  
  16 pixels wide, for both 4, 8 and 16 pixels loop filters
  
  (and the 4/8 mixed versions as well).
  For the 8 pixel wide versions, it is pretty close in speed (the
  
  v_4_8 and v_8_8 filters are the best examples of this ; the h_4_8
  
  and h_8_8 filters seem to get some gain in the load/transpose/store
  
  part). For the 16 pixels wide ones, we get a speedup of around
  
  1.2-1.4x compared to the 32 bit version.
  Examples of runtimes vs the 32 bit version, on a Cortex A53 :
  
                                         ARM AArch64
  
  vp9_loop_filter_h_4_8_neon :          144.0   127.2
  
  vp9_loop_filter_h_8_8_neon :          207.0   182.5
  
  vp9_loop_filter_h_16_8_neon :         415.0   328.7
  
  vp9_loop_filter_h_16_16_neon :        672.0   558.6
  
  vp9_loop_filter_mix2_h_44_16_neon :   302.0   203.5
  
  vp9_loop_filter_mix2_h_48_16_neon :   365.0   305.2
  
  vp9_loop_filter_mix2_h_84_16_neon :   365.0   305.2
  
  vp9_loop_filter_mix2_h_88_16_neon :   376.0   305.2
  
  vp9_loop_filter_mix2_v_44_16_neon :   193.2   128.2
  
  vp9_loop_filter_mix2_v_48_16_neon :   246.7   218.4
  
  vp9_loop_filter_mix2_v_84_16_neon :   248.0   218.5
  
  vp9_loop_filter_mix2_v_88_16_neon :   302.0   218.2
  
  vp9_loop_filter_v_4_8_neon :           89.0    88.7
  
  vp9_loop_filter_v_8_8_neon :          141.0   137.7
  
  vp9_loop_filter_v_16_8_neon :         295.0   272.7
  
  vp9_loop_filter_v_16_16_neon :        546.0   453.7
  The speedup vs C code in checkasm tests is around 2-7x, which is
  
  pretty much the same as for the 32 bit version. Even if these functions
  
  are faster than their 32 bit equivalent, the C version that we compare
  
  to also became around 1.3-1.7x faster than the C version in 32 bit.
  Based on START_TIMER/STOP_TIMER wrapping around a few individual
  
  functions, the speedup vs C code is around 4-5x.
  Examples of runtimes vs C on a Cortex A57 (for a slightly older version
  
  of the patch) :
  
                           A57 gcc-5.3  neon
  
  loop_filter_h_4_8_neon :        256.6  93.4
  
  loop_filter_h_8_8_neon :        307.3 139.1
  
  loop_filter_h_16_8_neon :       340.1 254.1
  
  loop_filter_h_16_16_neon :      827.0 407.9
  
  loop_filter_mix2_h_44_16_neon : 524.5 155.4
  
  loop_filter_mix2_h_48_16_neon : 644.5 173.3
  
  loop_filter_mix2_h_84_16_neon : 630.5 222.0
  
  loop_filter_mix2_h_88_16_neon : 697.3 222.0
  
  loop_filter_mix2_v_44_16_neon : 598.5 100.6
  
  loop_filter_mix2_v_48_16_neon : 651.5 127.0
  
  loop_filter_mix2_v_84_16_neon : 591.5 167.1
  
  loop_filter_mix2_v_88_16_neon : 855.1 166.7
  
  loop_filter_v_4_8_neon :        271.7  65.3
  
  loop_filter_v_8_8_neon :        312.5 106.9
  
  loop_filter_v_16_8_neon :       473.3 206.5
  
  loop_filter_v_16_16_neon :      976.1 327.8
  The speed-up compared to the C functions is 2.5 to 6 and the cortex-a57
  
  is again 30-50% faster than the cortex-a53.
  This is an adapted cherry-pick from libav commits
  
  9d2afd1eb8c5cc0633062430e66326dbf98c99e0 and
  
  31756abe29eb039a11c59a42cb12e0cc2aef3b97.
  Signed-off-by : Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje@gmail.com>
  

  • [DH] libavcodec/aarch64/Makefile
  • [DH] libavcodec/aarch64/vp9dsp_init_aarch64.c
  • [DH] libavcodec/aarch64/vp9lpf_neon.S